Stop mistreating your
officers (ministers). They all deserve a pension, not just those who remain as
officers until retirement.
THE PETITION
This petition asks the trustees of The Salvation Army Officers Pension Fund, a UK registered charity operating a non-contributory pension scheme, to provide all former Salvation Army officers (full-time ministers of religion) with a pension, not just those who remain as officers until retirement. The Minister for Civil Society, Rob Wilson MP, has advised that the trustees can do this by presenting a petition to Parliament to amend The Salvation Army Act 1963.
The
Salvation Army is one of the UK’s largest and most respected charities, a
Christian movement which seeks the relief of poverty, offering its services
without discrimination. But is the Salvation Army really being true to itself?
As
well as providing spiritual care, Salvation Army officers are ordained and
commissioned to undertake important leadership and management responsibilities
which underpin the movement’s work among the poor and marginalised. They are
also people who feel compelled to roll up their sleeves and offer practical
help when it is most needed. As ministers of religion, officers are paid a
small monthly allowance, but they are not regarded as employees in any legal
sense and therefore do not enjoy the protection of employment law. This leaves
them in a highly vulnerable position when things go wrong or trust is broken.
Many officers have a spouse who is also an officer, which can make the
situation doubly difficult if things go wrong. Sadly, there is a high dropout
rate among officers, a very high proportion of whom resign before reaching
retirement age. There are a variety of reasons for this, including ill health,
family circumstances, disillusionment, mistreatment or even a crisis of faith.
In
my own case, I resigned in 2011 as Director for Personnel in the north of
England due to a breakdown of trust which followed on from my whistle-blowing
on an important matter of principle. (My wife, also an officer, resigned at the
same time for similar reasons). We continue to serve as Salvation Army
volunteers in the city where we live but do not envisage becoming officers
again.
All
serving officers live in rent-free furnished accommodation provided by the
Salvation Army. In 2011 I was given a small resignation grant of £1378.00 to
help secure accommodation, furniture etc and to help with living expenses until
I gained employment, but was denied a pension when I reach pensionable age. My
wife was also denied a pension.
The
1963 Act states that: "The pension fund shall be non-contributory and
nothing in this Act shall confer any right on any officer or other person to
receive or continue to receive a pension or a pension of any particular
amount." Therefore the Fund is a Pension Fund in name only, since it has
no members and the payments are according to rules which may be redefined at
any point at the discretion of the Board. As a serving officer I had to ensure
that sufficient funds were raised to make a substantial monthly payment into
the fund, but these contributions were not linked to me as an individual. As
this is the only pension scheme available to officers, it is entirely unfit for
purpose in 2014 and has been for a long time. Effectively the Salvation Army
has no true pension scheme for its officers only a charity that may or may not
offer retirement allowances.
Having
gladly given 23 years of my life to serve full-time with the Salvation Army in
the UK and at a mission hospital in Zimbabwe (for 3 years) at the height of the
HIV/AIDS crisis, I feel badly let down by the Salvation Army. My wife gave 32
years of full-time service, including 9 years as sister-in-charge of a leprosy
hospital in India. Between us that amounts to 55 years of full-time service
without a penny of pension to show for it. We have received much kind
assistance from friends and family, but we know there are other former officers
in a much worse situation.
In
a half hearted attempt to address the problem, in 2013 the trustees agreed to
provide some former officers with a retirement allowance, where resignation had
been on or after 01 January 2007 and where at least 10 years service had been
completed. This offer was later withdrawn on the grounds that the Charity
Commission could not authorise a policy of making ex-gratia payments. The
Commission did say, however, that allowances could be made to former officers
within the Salvation Army’s charitable objects, i.e the relief of poverty. The
Salvation Army has decided therefore to means test former officers when they
reach pensionable age and only those who qualify for the government Pension
Credit scheme will be entitled to a Salvation Army pension. The Commission’s
suggestion that former officers can be treated as poverty-cases is entirely
inappropriate, since the poverty will have been largely caused by the charity
itself! This does not even begin to address the underlying moral question of
why the dedicated service of a former officer should be looked upon differently
to that of an officer who continues to serve until retirement. The latter will
certainly not be means tested before receiving a pension! Currently there is an
anomaly which means it is possible for someone to become an officer later in
life, serve 10 years and retire with a pension and access to subsidised
retirement accommodation. There are former officers who served as many as 35
years or more, but because they resigned before reaching statutory retirement
age, they receive neither pension nor subsidised accommodation - this is
discriminatory and ethically unacceptable.
The
Salvation Army is a very wealthy organisation. (In 2012/13 its income in the UK
was more than £181m - as recorded on its annual return for the Charity Commission).
It also has large investments and a vast property portfolio. It can afford to
do the right thing!
Please
sign this petition to support the cause of former Salvation Army officers. It
is only the pressure of public opinion which will bring about a change for the
better for this vulnerable group. The Minister for Civil Society, Rob Wilson,
has offered his sympathy to the position which former officers find themselves
in following many years of service for the charity but has confirmed that the Charity
Commission has no power to intervene as long as the charity is acting within
its governing document (in this case the Salvation Army Act 1963). In the past
the Salvation Army has successfully sought amendments to the Act for other
reasons, but not it seems in relation to pensions for former officers. This
could be due in to a conflict of interest on the part of trustees, all of whom
are senior Salvation Army officers who will become beneficiaries of the pension
fund in due course. The Charity Commission are aware of this conflict of
interest but have stated they are unable to challenge it as the conflict of
interest has been authorised by the governing document.
The
Salvation Army claims to be committed to supporting victims of modern slavery.
Indeed it is responsible for delivering the UK government's contract to manage
support services for adult victims of Human Trafficking. Imagine how it feels
to be a Salvation Army officer who needs to withdraw from that role, for
whatever reason, but knowing that doing so will cost you your security in old
age. Whilst it cannot be equated to the suffering of a trafficked victim, it
effectively amounts to entrapment. To me it feels like slavery.
In
2015 the Salvation Army celebrates its 150th birthday, but clearly there is
still great need for cultural change, including a move away from cult-like
behaviour and a dependency culture. Help make it a birthday to remember by
encouraging this cherished organisation to really grow up, retain its
integrity, and take its responsibilities seriously by living out its espoused
mission to relieve poverty and stop discriminating against its former officers.
This is morally and ethically wrong and needs to stop! If it doesn’t then
donors may think twice before supporting an organisation that does a lot of
great work but treats some of its former ‘workers’ with contempt in a manner
which is both unkind and morally reprehensible.
LETTER
TO
Salvation
Army
Stop
mistreating your officers (ministers). They all deserve a pension, not just
those who remain as officers until retirement.
RECENT
UPDATES
25
SUPPORTERS
16
Dec 2014
Petition
started on 14 Dec 2014
Philip
Mountain
8 comments:
Hi Sven
I've just seen your post about pensions. Surely the pension is frozen at time of leaving TSA as an officer and then paid out when that person retires from whatever job they may have at that time ?
Retired Officer UK & I
Thx
Anonymous retired SA officer UK
Although the article was posted by me, it's penned by a former UK officer. I never had the privilege to serve in the UK&I Territory but stand in awe of all the wonderful work the SA undertakes here, and offered up to God by such a qualified, gifted and dedicated group of officers- we're in good hands!
Unfortunately the freezing of pensions does not happen. If you leave you lose everything. Terrible situation to be in.
The phrase in the article 'the salvation army should ..... retain its integrity' would have been better stated as 'regain' its integrity. TSA has no regard for its officers or soldiers who find themselves at odds with its peculiarities, and recent well-publicised 'falls from grace' have shown that it has little integrity where it counts.
Where is the link to sign the petition?
Anonymous - the link is there - plain as day - It's in large YELLOW LETTERS: "THE PETITION" Ask a friend to help you find it...
sorry but there's something I don't understand. I remember in the 1970s and early 1980s that some of my "allowance" was withheld to pay for an SA pension - but about a year before I left I think this stopped and we were all told to make our own arrangements. I don't receive SA pension but I do get almost £2 a month from Wesleyan for what I paid in that year. (I do try not to spend it all at once!!!!!!
UK Former
Almost 300 people have signed the petition so far. the 115 comments speak powerfully of the need for cultural change and justice. (The comments are listed beneath the petition. Keep clicking on "More Reasons" in the bottom right hand corner). Please share this petition as widely as you can. Thank you.
Philip Mountain, UK 'Former'
Post a Comment