Sunday, August 11, 2013

Dr. Thistle and family have returned home... To Karanda Mission Hospital

KARANDA MISSION HOSPITAL

The FSAOF will conclude our series on the HH/Thistle tragedy in 3 days. Dr. Paul Thistle and his family have returned to Zimbabwe and the Karanda Mission Hospital where he’s already donned his surgical gown, mask and gloves.

The below are but a portion of the comments posted on the SA Canada’s site almost a year ago. Sadly, there has been no update by the SA at any level. Consequently, there is reason for encouragement, joy or immediate hope.
We'll be creating a Prayer Wall of support on FaceBook today.

We report - you decide
_____________________________ 


Our International Headquarters confirms that Howard Hospital is operating with two doctors plus other medical staff. A plan is in place for the future of the hospital and while this facility is International in nature, we remain committed to supporting its work. In fact, a container with medical supplies valued at more than $300,000 is already en route to Zimbabwe.

Some responses to the article: ‘SA in Canada remains committed to Howard Hospital’
Posted on August 23, 2012 in Newswire

Having trained in Zimbabwe with Dr. Thistle as my preceptor I can assure you that nobody is nearly as competent or hard working as he is. He is a man with an undeniable passion for medicine and cares for people like no other. Taking him away from Howard is a crime. I think we can all agree that there is corruption within the ranks of SA Zim. I think we can go further to say that this corruption influenced IHQ. And finally, I think we can all agree that SA Canada is aware of what is going on but too afraid to admit it and bring this SA scandal into the spotlight.…
              
Tina and David Ivany
  
This is an absolute disgrace. Paul and Pedrinah, our cousins, have done all the work to keep this hospital running under the direst circumstances. Only now, after their “re-assignment” – a lovely sanitized word-play to disguise the real situation, does the Army IHQ suggest investigating the corruption on site. Only now, after years of underfunding, does it talk about “enhanced future investment in the hospital” – words that Dr. Thistle and his team have waited years to hear. Paul does not need to be re-acclimatized to Canada. Unfortunately, there is only one Dr. Paul Thistle and his heart is with his patients in Zimbabwe. Let him go, and you will never see the likes of him again.
              
Elizabeth Argent
Once again, shame on the Army! This morning in our church bulletin is yet another piece of propaganda under the guise of a press release ensuring members of the SA that all is well and good and going according to plan with HH and Dr. Thistle. This could not be farther from the truth. They continue to assert that it’s business as usual at HH. This is nothing short off a lie. The $300 thousand shipment is no longer going over as they claim. Which, by the way is not a SA donation of medicines and supplies but a donation made by doctors from the Trillium hospital-the SA is only responsible for the $15 thousand shipping costs- that shipment has now understandably been pulled.               

Gay Pratt
 This is too little to late. Where was the IHQ and THQ when all this was happening. How could the IHQ allow HQ in Zimbabwe to put Capt(Dr.) P Thistle through what they have. IHQ must have known about the corruption and money missing or arriving too late. As for the Howard Hospital functioning without Dr. Thistle, Do you not listen to the news??? I have been to Howard Hospital, because of the SA lack of backbone, people are dying, and suffering, Nurses have been arrested, hospital equipment stolen. All because of certain Zim SA personnel who have a personal vendetta against Paul. Even the Government of Zimbabwe has wanted Paul to remain at Howard. Amazing that our own SA took so long to get involved. Here is a man who has given the SA the best PR they could have, He has been honored by his peers he is a humble and dedicated physician and officer and where is the SA support for him when he needed it. It is outside the SA that Paul received help I am embarrassed to be SA…                  

Jennifer Reid
When I first went to Howard Hospital in 2001 I was struck by how old and dilapidated its buildings are, windows with no screens let alone glass, peeling paint, out-dated equipment, empty supply shelves. People line up for care, and then again for medication (which often runs out), and family members sleep on the floors beside patients’’ beds. And yet, those ramshackle buildings were filled with life and hope and service. On day two of my visit, I was shown “the new Howard Hospital”, a fine expansive building, with fresh walls and wiring and plumbing for updated medical facility. I was told that a Salvation Army donor had left millions of dollars to build this new hospital that the people so desperately need. So what happened to this new Howard Hospital?

Somehow, those millions of dollars given to the SA “ran out.” The buildings are there, but are as empty as a ghost town, right beside the old hospital which pulses with life. They’re now becoming dilapidated from non-use and neglect, and the Zimbabwean authorities declared it unfit for use in 2006, but you’ll not find a single word about this in any SA press statement. Such massive waste and mismanagement of donor dollars.

I was teaching clinical midwifery at Howard in 2001 and we were asking Canadians to donate $4 so that we could administer AIDS drugs to women in labour to prevent spread of HIV to their babies. We knew the women were going to die because there were no AIDS medications available then, but the babies were more likely to be adopted by other families if they were HIV-negative. The people see the new hospital, empty, and reports from people in Zimbabwe are saying that service provision in the old hospital is a shell of its former self since the Thistles left. And people there seem to be talking about corruption in the handling of funds, and how unfair it is to them that the Thistles have been forced out. Lives are at stake. Is it really okay with all of us that the same people who allowed the “slippage” of the new hospital funds to do this investigation? Doesn’t SA need outside assistance to get to the bottom of it? And if it’s not a personal vendetta against the Thistles, why do they have to leave while the investigation is occurring? Lives are at stake and the right actions need to be taken.

Brian Nichols
The word I have had today from inside Howard Hospital is that only one doctor remains, there are only 2 patients in the hospital and no medicine in the pharmacy. This is a hospital that normally averages more than 300 patients per day. Where is the truth? I have been told that $18,000. worth of building supplies that were purchased with money raised in our Peterborough community have been looted. We know by whom. People are dying unnecessarily. Wake up to what is happening here and stop sending out false information.

John Sullivan
My parents were missionary-officers in Africa. I was born there, am a former officer, and for the past fifty years have been a minister in the United Church of Canada. I have been the senior minister of some of the largest congregations in the denomination, and at eighty, I am still active, serving a rural charge. I have become aware that a large contribution to Howard has been made by one of our United Churches and handed directly to the administrator at Howard. The church is requesting that the money be returned until the issue of Dr. Thistle is resolved. The officer-administrator is named in the report, and the church has tried to contact him without success. All someone would need to do from that particular congregation is to report it to the United Church Observer and suggest they write an article about it. United Church people are encouraged to divide their tithe money in half, with half going to the local and national church, and the other half to charities of their choice. In the past when the national church hears of mismanagement of funds by non-government organizations they inform our members and adherents not to support the charity. Because UCC members are undoubtedly the largest contributors to TSA, and the readership of the Observer is largely made up of those in their later years, a directive from the national church would be all they would need to remove the Army from their wills, and to refrain from donating annually as they have in the past. The Canadian territory therefore needs to be more transparent to the public and more supportive of Dr. Thistle, who is considered by many to be a Salvation Army Mother Teresa.

Alison Tennent August 25, 2012 at 11:10 am          It is an absolute disgrace what has happened to Dr. Thistle at Howard Hospital recently. I am not a member of the Salvation Army, but I am a physician (obstetrician/gynecologist) who has volunteered at Howard on 4 separate occasions. I just got back from Howard Hospital in July after working there for 3 months. I know the situation on the ground there very well. Your press release that says that the hospital is functioning well is completely inaccurate. When I was there, the hospital was busting at the seams, stretched beyond capacity with sick patients. The only reason it was staying afloat was because of the extraordinary efforts of one man, Dr. Paul Thistle. He was working ridiculous hours, seeing over a hundred patients a day and doing complex surgeries. On top of that he was doing the duties that the hospital administration should have been taking care of. It was quite obvious when I was there that the hospital administrator was completely incompetent and downright obstructive. How can you say that the hospital is running well with 2 doctors? What nonsense is that? I know these 2 doctors. They are not obstetricians or surgeons. They are general doctors. Dr Thistle is formally trained as an obstetrician and gynecologist, who has done extra training in general surgery, oncology surgery, urology surgery, complex wound management. How many of these types of doctors (with the surgical skills of Paul Thistle) do you have waiting in your ranks to replace him?

The decision to transfer him back to Canada with one month notice (and then later at 48 hours notice) is an irresponsible and downright dangerous decision. You cannot replace a doctor like that without at least a 6 months transition period with him and the new doctor both in place. I know for a fact that many women in that region will die of complications of pregnancy because he is not there. And where are all the sick and dying patients right now that I saw in the other wards? They are not at Howard; that has been confirmed. There are hardly any patients in the hospital right now. I can tell you they are not in Harare; they cannot afford the transport or the hospital fees. I urge you to wake up. Stop trying to protect your organization and focus your investigations on where the real problem lies, the leadership at the SA Territorial headquarters in Harare, specifically Commissioner Chigariro. Get Dr. Thistle back to Howard as soon as possible so more people in the Chiweshe region don’t die and suffer unnecessarily.

Elizabeth Argent
This whole situation is tragic and what is even more disturbing to me is the stand that the Army has taken with respect to Dr. Thistle, a well respected, hard working, honest, man. Today I am sad to be a Salvationist. The Army leadership who steadfastly sticks to its pat politically correct press releases and slick responses needs to stand up against the systemic corruption that thrives at Howard and within the Leadership in Zimbabwe….

Shirley Watkinson
I have read these comments, and am so sad that the SA is so ‘cold’ and seemingly indifferent to the people that come to HH for assistance. So much for ‘we care’, since ‘we’ don’t…. I have also been to HH and know about the long hours and devotion that Paul has for these people. He is a true Christian man….so where are all the others who are supposed to support him? Where are his superior (in name only, please) officers that have made this decision to simply pull him out and leave about 250,000 people without medical care? and hope? SW
       
Lorna Rogers Simard
You are telling people above, “If you have questions, we would suggest contacting The Salvation Army in Zimbabwe, or contacting our International Headquarters.” I contacted the Zim territory last week and have had no response. Now their THQ website has been removed from the web. When you type into your browser http://www.SalvationArmyZim.org. Up comes a box saying Bad Request – Invalid Host Name – so how are people to contact them now. as for IHQ, many people have emailed them with questions and comments and they just refer emails to the Canadian THQ and replies are received from THQ here – IHQ remains silent.

This seems like an internal SA 3 ring circus – IHQ deflecting emails to THQ Canada, and Canada telling people to contact IHQ and the Zim territory which has their website removed from the web. Ultimately the buck starts and stops with IHQ but we are all praying that SA leadership does the right thing in this situation and put the Thistle’s ASAP back at the Howard.
         

John Sullivan
It saddens me to know that United Church people, who have made large contributions to the work of the Howard Hospital, have had to ask that the money be returned, until the issue with Captain Dr. Thistle has been resolved. Instead of their concern being treated with sensitivity, the only response to their request, and the heartfelt pleas of others who have written to this site, is for the tambourine to be held out asking for more money! Why would anyone in their right mind make a contribution to THQ, knowing that it would be sent on to IHQ, which would send it on to THQ Zim, with the knowledge that some of it would disappear before it reached the hospital?

Kim MacDonad
I too worked as a physician at Howard Hospital for three months this past year. You won’t find a more dedicated, kinder or skilled physician in Zimbabwe, or pretty much anywhere. You don’t replace Paul Thistle, or go on at Howard Hospital without him, you can’t. This statement from the Salvation Army is marketing smooth talk and diversion, nothing more.

They either have no idea at the incompetence and corruption that is occurring at the administrative level at Howard Hospital, or don’t care.

I encourage Canadians, and caring citizens everywhere, to speak in number with your donations. Send them to reputable, professional and sincere international organizations. There are many to choose from, but the Salvation Army has shown from its handling of this matter, that they are not one of them. Demand answers as to where your money has gone. Ask why it has been stolen by members of the Salvation Army. There are hundreds of us that have volunteered money and time to the people of Zimbabwe. We know the community and hospital well. There is nothing humanitarian, Christian or right about this entire matter.
           
Marit Kalvo and Annlaug Teigene
We are shocked and do not understand that the Salvation Army has removed Dr. Thistle from Howard Hospital. A man that has dedicated his whole life to helping and treating sick and poor people. A man that worked hard in the hospital from early morning to late evening every day and spent most of his spare time getting sponsors and donations to Howard Hospital. Without him the hospital would not have had medicines and medical equipment for treating patients during the eighteen years he worked there. Since 2002 we have been at Howard Hospital every year for short and long periods, working as voluntary anesthetists. We know well both the hospital, workers and the community. In addition to working at the hospital we organize a Norwegian aid program, helping more than 100 children and young people by paying their school fees. During one of our stays at Howard Hospital we were surprised to learn that the Salvation Army does not contribute economically to Howard Hospital. Rather, the local Salvation Army drains money from the hospital. We have witnessed the administrators and other SA officers stealing from the hospital. We wrote a letter to International SA in London about this affair. Nothing was done. And now they have removed he who contributed and sacrificed. It is good to hear that SA Canada is sending medical supplies. We hope they are necessary medicines and medical supplies, as a lot of not usable supplies are sent. We know that medical supplies are constantly in demand at Howard Hospital. But who shall do the surgery when Dr. Thistle is no longer at the hospital? The two Zim doctors are not surgeons. They work at Out Patient and with medical treatment. Our last stay at Howard Hospital was in April/May this year. At the time there were between 10 and 15 operations a day, many complicated cases that only Dr. Thistle can operate. To carry out advanced surgery at a hospital like Howard, with so little medical equipment, requires a very experienced and skilled surgeon, like Paul Thistle.

Susan Heder
All my life, I have respected the Salvation Army, and though I am United Church, have supported the very necessary and practical work of the Salvation Army with personal donations, and persuading other organizations to donate. My husband and I were at Howard Hospital in 1998, and even then, a much younger Dr. Thistle was highly respected. So ours has been a very long supportive relationship with Howard Hospital, largely due to the confidence we had in the integrity of Dr. Thistle and the Salvation Army. My faith in the Salvation Army has been deeply shaken by their actions with respect to the Thistles and Howard Hospital. I will continue to follow this situation with great interest, particularly watching for how the Salvation Army in Zimbabwe, International, and in Canada, will redeem their reputation with the public. I wonder what God thinks of all this. May God watch out for the people of Chiweshe, the greatest losers in all this controversy. Wonderful as they are, the Thistles will continue to live. But some people in Chiweshe will die. Shame on some of the people (not all) in the Salvation Army.

Jennifer Reid
A friend from Zimbabwe and I just started a group called Zimbabweans and Canadians for Howard Hospital” on Facebook. Here’s the description; “This group is for Zimbabweans, Canadians, and others who believe that Howard Hospital is a very special place where the community and the hospital staff have worked together as a team over many hardship years, to provide successful health programs that work for the Zimbabwean people. The mountains were tough to climb, but the Howard staff and lots of community volunteers set up great services for very difficult challenges, like HIV and TB, maternal and child mortality, malnutrition, and AIDS orphans. They found ways to provide peer-based counselling, youth leadership, and volunteer homecare workers for dying patients. Sadly, last month the team was broken apart…. key staff were suddenly removed. So lets share strategies to bring back the right staff for the job!” Let me know if you want to join…. we would really like our Salvationist friends to help us know what to do! http://www.facebook.com/#!/jennifer.reid.1217

 Derere
Last Sunday, the local citadel, Nyachuru, had less than 20 of the more than 800 soldiers attending the services. probably a boycott…

jenn reid
I just heard that people have lost trust in TSA’s commitment to the region, and some are turning to traditional healers for treatment. If patients receiving AIDS & / or TB meds go off their medications, they run the risk of developing disease-resistant strains which can rapidly spread.
_______________________
Do you have any current information on the programmes that Dr Thistle initiated - the ARVs in particular? Or the schools initiative? Or the effects that his leaving has had on the community?

Also, there's the IHQ statement of October last - Major Pallant gave some assurances, but there's been no subsequent verification or otherwise whether the assurances have been carried out.

Here then, the commitments made!

TSA issued a statement on 26th October 2012, where it stated that:

Howard Hospital is highly valued by the Salvation Army which remains committed to the continuing development of health services in that community.

Question: how has that commitment translated into progress since Dr Thistle left?

Question: What is the current position on a successor to Dr Thistle?

The statement said that the dismissal of Dr Thistle was seen to be ‘an opportunity for Howard Hospital to receive some new leadership’.
Question: why was his replacement not in place when at least two years’ planning had gone into the move?

The statement said ‘we will be improving our services at Howard Hospital. So we can give these assurances to the community at Chiweshe’.
Question: What improvements have been made to date?

The statement said that TSA would ‘work on the completion of the new Howard Hospital and we are strongly hoping that the new hospital will be finished by the end of 2013’.
Question: Are these plans progressing? Reports on the Internet refute this fact.

The statement said that  ‘the commitment to the Tauriro Clinic and the ARV programme is absolutely there. We can report that the clinical review showed that we have all the drugs for ARV; that patients can receive those and there will be a continuity of care.
Question: IS that continuity of care taking place currently?

The statement said ‘we have had funding from USAID for children at school and every indication is that this is continuing’.
Question: Can you confirm that this is continuing?

The statement said ‘I was discussing just yesterday with some donors about bringing new equipment for HH’.
Question: Has that come to fruition? If so, what was the equipment that was provided?

The statement said ‘we assure the people of the Chiweshe community that The Salvation Army is committed to working with them to improve their quality of life and health’.
Question: How is this being enacted today?

NO RESPONSE WHATSOEVER FROM ANY SA SOURCE

41 comments:

Anonymous said...

Are all these postings not 12 months old now? Is there nothing new to report?

Anonymous said...

I think the last sentence says it: No response from the Salvation Army at all. They are the only ones who can update this at the moment - at least the Roman Catholics and the Anglicans have the honour and humility to apologise for errors made. Have you seen anything inside TSA organisation that tells of problems, or mistakes, or struggles? I haven't. It's all self congratulatory stuff - odd or what, as we are supposed to be engaging in the war against sin and wickedness. TSA has lost its pioneering spirit. I fear we are 'too long at ease in Zion' these days.
But - the very fact that there are so many people visiting this site shows that the troops are at least becoming alive and alert to what the leaders are doing in their name.

FORMER SALVATION ARMY OFFICERS FELLOWSHIP said...

Most of the comments range in age from 11 to 9 months. No, nothing new to report except that the Thistle family is now back 'home' in Zimbabwe, and that we've created a Prayer Wall...

Anonymous said...

There is a value in showing these reports from last year - it shows to the whole SA world that people for a year have been speaking out against what TSA has done to no avail and that IHQ has remained silent, other than the occasional report from their two spin doctors Majors Dean Pallant and John Murray.

Anonymous said...

Well said.

Anonymous said...

Learned that this series is coming to a close? Your choice or pressure from your fellowship Sven?

SA UK

Anonymous said...

'Learned'? - it says so at the top of the article

Anonymous said...

A classical example of what happens when vital life giving oxygen is not being applied or cut off - the breath of life slips away and the story/ issue eventually becomes lifeless and limp.

What has happened here is the flogging of a dead horse - or the flogging of a horse to death - total overkill, trying to whip up interest where there was none in the first place inside the English speaking immediate spheres of potential 'interest'.

The repetitive nature of tens of thousands of words is boring and people soon lose interest when there is nothing fresh to report. The number of comments to any article rarely goes above 40 - often far less - and then by a rather limited group of posters who are not really representative of total FSAOF membership, I include myself in this.

In a sense it is all good entertainment to see how people inter-relate and how gullible some are and react emotionally without having a balanced, overall perspective.

In an other sense, there has been a not so clever game played here by some to achieve their own ends through others - the proverbial passing of bullets for others to load and fire. That is not pretty stuff!

The story of HH and Dr Thistle was, is and remains a sad saga and as various parties have worked towards a satisfactory conclusion over the past 12 months, may all move on from strength to strength.

The art is not to take any private blog too seriously. Usually there is a hidden agenda somewhere. If you do then you could easily become manipulated and eventually the manipulator of others.

Have a nice day, the sun is shining on all!;);)

Anonymous said...

'In a sense it is all good entertainment ' - not for the people of Chiweshe, it isn't. Shameful comment.

Anonymous said...

"various parties have worked towards a satisfactory conclusion over the past 12 months'. Haven't read anything about this, except spin and smoke and mirrors from TSA. I would think that if it HAD been resolved satisfactorily, there wouldn't be this eerie silence from IHQ - they'd be shouting it from the rooftops. TSA is a VERY boastful organisation. You won't read anything other than positives in their publications.
If there IS news about Howard hospital, it would be very good to hear about it. I won't hold my breath.

Anonymous said...

"Good Entertainment"refers to comments made from certain people not the overall issue!
Read the whole comment before offering a knee jerk reaction.

Anonymous said...

Sorry - I saw nothing in the 'whole comment' that was sympathetic to the HH cause. 'Flogging a dead horse', 'boring', 'manipulative' - it wasn't a knee jerk reaction. I am one of the many people who have only recently heard about this event, and I am appalled at the salvation army leadership. I don't belong to the FSAOF, I am not an officer, but I do care for people and their welfare, and I'm glad that this series has been posted - it gives the rank and file an insight into the chasm that exists between the leaders and the rest of us.
I have since learned that it isn't the only case of its kind where the SA is concerned, and it is good that a series like this can open our eyes as members. I'm sure we all think that the global SA is a fantastic organisation that is, in the main, 'doing the most good', but we do need to be told about the shortcomings as well. It's not healthy for the membership of any organisation to be kept in the dark about their failings.
Companies have shareholders - they are told about anything in the company that is causing concern, and they are given the opportunity to air their views at shareholders meetings. SA membership are not given either of those privileges - we're not told about the concerns, and neither are we given any opportunity for saying what we think about them. We exist in a bubble of 'Army' perfection.
At least this website is prepared to 'do the unthinkable' and air the sordid facts of this appalling case, and to give us, the people, an awareness of what is being done on our behalf by leaders who should have handled this with far more spiritual finesse, and with far more consideration for the tragic effects of their decision.
If you are not, as you say, sympathetic to this 'rather limited group of posters who are not really representative of total FSAOF membership', then that is up to your conscience. But events like this cannot go unchallenged, and we must all stand up for people who have no voice.

Anonymous said...

Is that because you did not, want not or could not see beyond the 'flogging,boring, manipulative'? Read the whole entry again in context. Good reading is an art! Selective reading is not.

Jolinda Cooper said...

I find the last anonymous poster to be arrogant. I don't know on what grounds you feel the right to pass judgement on the "art of reading".

Personally, I wonder why you, Critical Anonymous, continue to come to the blog. You find nothing here that is pleasing to you, and you are on your platform, decrying the content, the style, the methods. You, Critical Anonymous, may be one person or many. But, if all content on here is as fruitless, worthless, repetative, manipulative and soon to die from lack of interest as you keep claiming, I can't help but wonder why you DO keep coming back. To what end? For what purpose?

Unless, of course, you are someone(s) who have something to lose as more and more people hear about this. Perhaps you are witnessing the beginning of a season of accountability which you dread.

But for whatever reason, more people are hearing. More people are reading. More people are sharing with others in the corps, in their divisions, in their territories.

I personally share a link to each blog entry on my Facebook page. I know that at least the topic is seen by current, former and retired SA officers, fellow Salvationists, and non-Salvationist friends. And for every person that links the blog post on their Facebook page, the circle of exposure grows larger.

So, continue to come back, oh critical anonymous one(s). I would hate for you to miss what comes next.

Anonymous said...

To what end and purpose? It is informative, entertaining and above all fun to see how people react to any subject and then inter-act with eachother. Lighten up, smile, be happy in Jesus and keep integrity intact.

Anonymous said...

As one with a clear conscience before God, no condemnation now I dread ofcourse from any source.

Btw.... I am so pleased that you still want me to keep actively visiting this blog....I might just do that from time to time but now I have got a calling and ministry to fulfill with holidays. ('Vacation' for those in the colonies) over.

Remember, the rain soaks the just and not so just in equal measure;);)

Anonymous said...

'As one with a clear conscience before God' - really? My conscience is never clear - how fortunate you are.
One's 'conscience' can't exist as complete or in a state of perfection - it reacts to events as they happen - either your 'conscience' is pricked by them, or it is not. For you to state that yours is clear would mean that you aren't moved by any of what is contained in these articles and blogs.
I do hope your holiday clears your head and moves you to compassion for those less fortunate - those who just exist from day to day, like the people of Chiweshe - for whom a holiday is just a distant dream. As Christians, that is what we are about - caring, not making glib comments that are devoid of feeling.

Anonymous said...

'As one with a clear conscience before God' - really? My conscience is never clear - how fortunate you are.'

Yes....'my soul has found a resting place, and I am now, through heavenly grace, at peace with God....how rich am I such wealth possessing' - SASB 536

A clear conscience before God = being at peace with God!

Anonymous said...

Ah, yes - Richard Slater, the father of Salvation Army music. Wasn't he cloistered in the SA musical department for over 60 years writing his many songs? I doubt if he had the euphoric clarity of conscience spoken of above - most of his more contemplative songs had the same theme, which shows that he wasn't content with a level of service once attained - he always wanted to confess more, to give more, to be sanctified, to strive to be better for his Lord. Not for him the 'clear conscience' - he realised the importance of the 9th doctrine - that continuance in a state of salvation depended on continued obedient faith in Christ. 'Continued' being the operative word. He also wrote song 225.
Afar from God thy feet have wandered
Afar from God thy soul has strayed:
His gifts in sin thy hand has squandered
And yet in love He calls thee home.
God is near thee, tell thy story:
He will hear thy tale of sorrow:
God is near thee, and in mercy
He will welcome thy return.
I could go on - the thorny way of sin, the vain pleasures of the heart, weary and entombed in the gloom of despair, a broken heart, a heart of deep grief - doesn't sound like a man at peace with God to me. Which goes to show - a spiritual state and one's conscience are not static - they change with our experiences. If we had all attained clarity of conscience, what's the point in striving?
Conscience - the moral sense of right and wrong - should always move us to question what is done in our name.
The Howard Hospital sits uneasily with my conscience - I cannot reconcile the SA leadership's course of action with those of a loving God who cares for the welfare of all His children.

Anonymous said...

Thank you for your interesting take on Richard Slater...who served for 30 years in the musical department....remember that song 225 was not meant to be introspective but for the one who still had to find peace with God - that is why it is in the 'invitation' section and song 536 in the 'praise and thanksgiving' holiness enjoyed arena.

For me, the euphoric clarity about him being at peace with God lie in the penned words of the chorus of 536. Otherwise, why pen them in the first place?;);)

Anonymous said...

Not really bothered about Richard Slater and his sheltered spiritual life - his was a different era in any case - but like I said, the songs were written at different times in his life and hints of inner turmoil are there, otherwise he wouldn't have penned those words either - he would have stuck to the many happy-clappy ones that we are blessed/cursed with, depending on your musical preference. Hymn/songwriters rarely pen words of 'advice' - they are usually written because of some experiential events in their own lives. After all, if they are words of 'advice' - that could be construed as being judgmental on people who are perceived by the writer as living lives that fall short of God's requirements.
Meanwhile, while we engage in this amusing 'spat', the people of Chiweshe are still worse off than they were a year ago, babies are allegedly being born to face a life with HIV which could have been avoided, they have no surgeon to heal them, Dr Thistle remains sacked for acting in a biblical way and going to his spiritual leaders with an issue that he felt needed addressing, the good ol' SA has broken links to significant websites and hidden the history of the Howard Hospital from prying eyes, IHQ is asking itself 'which way are we going' (Youth Songs - blue book - advice to children) on their now infamous conflicting press releases, and sections of the soldiery are asking questions of them regarding integrity that they appear unwilling to answer.
You enjoy your soul's peace - me, I'll go on striving. Be blessed.

Anonymous said...

And you, stay blessed ;);)

This blog is fun, lightens my day no end....

Anonymous said...

"This blog is fun" - previous poster.
FUN????
A few years ago I had a "feminine cancer" and, even with the most excellent medical care, it was FAR from FUN!
And these people, many also in extremity, have been left without a surgeon for over a year! FUN?
I can't imagine how they must feel.
I haven't the words to describe what I think of you or your warped sense of humour. Hope you are never in the same situation as these poor African folk!

Anonymous said...

Hear, hear! Well said. The poster must keep the same indifferent company as the silent circle at IHQ.

Anonymous said...

Of course its fun, this blog is certainly amusing, especially some of the responses! Get a sense of perspective, be discerning and don't treat this or yourselves too seriously..... for your own good and health. After all, it is easy to get manipulated on the internet, including (especially?) religious sites.

Jolinda Cooper said...

To Anonymous who posted: "After all, it is easy to get manipulated on the internet, including (especially?) religious sites."

I guess this statement would apply to all the press statements and other information posted on the internet by The Salvation Army.

After all, their press statements about Howard Hospital were meant to manipulate, were they not?

Anonymous said...

"I guess this statement would apply to all the press statements and other information posted on the internet by The Salvation Army."

Absolutely true yet in the case of HH there has been next to nothing posted by the SA....remember: 'dead silence!'

This is probably the biggest bug bear for those outside the 'need to know' loop on SAFOF site to contend with. The unwillingness by the SA to interact on not their own terms is to ensure that nothing can be taken out of context - as it sure has the habit of doing.

Silence is golden

The least publicly said, the soonest things will be allowed to get dealt with and moved on

Anonymous said...

I don't believe people are calling for any heart-wrenching confessions - all I see on here is people's concern for the welfare of helpless people who are being condemned to a life hardly worth living because of TSA's intransigence and the fact that it ISN'T moving on to try to help and improve the quality of life for these poor people. Stubbornness and pride are a big barrier to moving forward. Sometimes the way of humility is best. it was good enough for Jesus - not for TSA, apparently.
This must be a first for any Christian setup - the troops calling for more practical Christianity from the leaders.

Anonymous said...

To the person who said 'silence is golden' - I read this on the internet, from Counterthought.org, written by Don Enevoldsen, writing in his series in which he is questioning church authority:


***Silence is a primary tool of concealment, and is usually implemented by whatever means are available, no matter how unethical they might be.

The most immediate lesson is that the phrase, “Silence is golden,” is most often spoken by people who have ugly things to hide, attitudes and behaviors that they want neither exposed or changed. …..The reason is simple. They don’t like having their corruption brought to any kind of accountability.

'Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God. (John 3:20-21)

Any time a leader preaches that silence is golden, there is likely something sinister to hide. ***

If TSA really has nothing to hide in this matter, then let them say so. Silence is not always golden.

Anonymous said...

"Any time a leader preaches that silence is golden, there is likely something sinister to hide."

That is a terrible negative!

Now a positive:

Silence is golden

Meaning

A proverbial saying, often used in circumstances where it is thought that saying nothing is preferable to speaking.

Keeping one's mouth shut is a great virtue, as in Don't tell anyone else about it silence is golden . Although this precise phrase was first recorded only in 1848, it is part of a much older proverb, "Speech is silver and silence is golden."

I know what I prefer to preach!

Anonymous said...

Perhaps you'd like to read the series 'Counterthought.org'
It's a revelation.

Anonymous said...

I had never heard of this guy before. It seems that he got badly burned in prosperity gospel teaching environments over a prolonged period of active involvement at top level.

Silence is more often that not golden in conjunction with an engaged brain and having the ability to find the correct moment and place, rather than shooting wildly from the hip. I call it 'actively waiting' with ears and eyes wide open and mouth firmly shut. This usually provides that extra bit of rope with which people hang themselves well and truly. This is far preferable and profitable over any other method in my humble opinion;);)

Anonymous said...

I don't think anyone is 'shooting wildly from the hip'. The HH issue is a 'specific' and there are 'specific' issues that TSA needs to address if it is going to regain the trust of the soldiery. None of this is wild speculation. It is all verified in fact. TSA has shown a dire dereliction of duty towards the Thistles, the Chiweshe people and the members who make up TSA.
At the moment this is being talked about at corps level, albeit quietly among people who have read this blog, and you can guarantee that once one person has read it he or she will tell someone else etc. At my corps the number of people 'in the know' is increasing - the corps officers apparently 'do not know anything' - I suppose the leadership structure and their 'challenge us and you're out' policy will understandably deter officers who rely on TSA for their livelihood - so it is only a matter of time before we will get together and raise the matter at a higher level.
I suppose that is what we are doing - 'actively waiting'. But that can only be temporary in a humanitarian issue such as this, where the suffering is ongoing.
I'm glad you qualified your 'silence is golden' mantra with 'silence is more often than not golden', because clearly silence has a time limit in this case. I'm not really sure from reading the above whose 'side' you are on, or to whom you refer when you speak about the extra bit of rope with which people hang themselves, but from the reactions to this sad saga it's clear to me that TSA are not doing themselves any favours by their restorative procrastination and their continued refusal to address the issue with truth, integrity and practical support for these people, whose 'suffering humanity' are exactly those we are supposed to serve. Leaders talk about serving suffering humanity all the time. Why is it making an exception for these people?

Anonymous said...

My reading is that the contributor was talking generally rather than specifically about a single issue such as HH.

People usually have the habit of self destructing - hanging themselves - by saying far too much and not being discerning enough when to keep mouth firmly shut. Try getting toothpaste back into a tube after squirting it out first!

Whether a time limit should be applied, i do not know but patience certainly is a great virtue. God often has appeared to be stone deaf to many people in desperate survival mode. What is time anyway? The still small voice is usually the most potent one that people will listen to, not the spouting mouth one.

Anonymous said...

'Challenge us and you will be out policy?'

I do not think it works so simply that way when constructive criticism is given . Whether people will listen and take heed is another matter. Where there is pure negative bloodymindedness being displayed, including defamatation of character and undermining of stated positions and authority it is usually the protractor who makes his or her position untenable themselves.

It is when matters get out of hand and become personal and no longer focussed on the issue itself, that is when prudent people will distance themselves - just as whst has happened recently on this blog when certain key members withdrew. The owner of this blog called them 'flip floppers' in one of his posts.

Anonymous said...

'It is when matters get out of hand and become personal and no longer focussed on the issue itself' - I'm not sure what is meant here.
I guess some people on this site probably know each other- it is, after all, a private blog, and the means of fellowship for former officers - but this series of blogs concerning the Howard hospital, the Thistles and IHQ etc has attracted a much wider audience - mainly made up of SA members who are horrified at the details and, in the absence of any other neutral medium, have wished to make their views known. Now these views may not be complimentary to TSA and its leaders, and they may not always be phrased sensitively, but I wouldn't think for one moment they were meant to be personal attacks. As one of the (effectively) disenfranchised rank and file members of TSA, I have never met any of the Army hierarchy, except for a brief impersonal handshake with General Linda Bond at a rally once which doesn't really count - but I have been shocked at what has happened in this case, and it is indisputable that individuals in IHQ made the decisions that have cause this furore. Individual IHQ Officers have issued defensive statements that have been conflicting, but just because they are named doesn't make any comments personal - it's like the Bible says 'Hate the sin but love the sinner'. It is the deed that we abhor - I doubt if many of us have any feelings personally for the officer staff at IHQ, purely because we don't know them.
And, an important point to note is that if TSA had quickly put into place some measures to compensate for their errors of judgment regarding HH, no-one would have known any of these facts – it could so easily have been different. I believe it’s called ‘damage limitation’. This hasn’t happened, to my knowledge.
So - to say that people are being personally attacked is, I think, a clever way of deflecting the focus away from the heart of the matter. Dr Paul Thistle is fortunate in that he is now free to practice medicine without the internal politics of TSA to contend with as well. But for the poor people at HH the misery goes on. And that is why members are frustrated – because, to us, the Army is seen as being hypocritical by not practising in this case what it preaches to the world.

Anonymous said...

The blogger who talked about ‘undermining stated positions and authority’.
Authority is power, which can be used either to dictate and segregate, or to arbitrate and empower. Authority is necessary, of course, especially in an organisation such as ours, but no authority should be without accountability, because without accountability, authority is authoritarian, and in a church environment this can't be healthy.
I don't think TSA has arbitrated or empowered in this instance.
There has to be a better way.

Anonymous said...

With 2020 hindsight there is always a better way!

Anonymous said...

And regrets, no doubt.

Anonymous said...

often, but not always of course

Anonymous said...

We do have issues within TSA about the role of our leaders, which have been highlighted by the Zimbabwe events - we are not set up in accordance with the New Testament church structure. Take the following statements. For 'elders' substitute 'SA leaders':

The goal of the elders and congregation should always be to speak and act as a united community. Both the leaders and the led should take time and effort to work & pray together to achieve this unity. Elders must inoculate themselves against aloofness, secrecy, or independently seeking their own direction. Godly elders want to involve every member of the body in the joy of living together as God's family. This requires free and open communication between elders and congregation.

The first Christian congregation shows us examples of a leadership council and congregation working together in decision-making and problem solving. In Acts 6, when conflicts broke out between the Hebrew and Hellenistic widows in the congregation over the fair distribution of funds, the leadership council immediately devised a plan of resolution. They called the congregation together and presented their plan. The congregation approved it, which called for them to choose seven men to take responsibility for the care of all the church widows. After the men were chosen, the apostles officially placed them in charge of the poor by the laying on of hands and prayer.

In Acts 15, the congregation in Jerusalem was confronted with serious doctrinal controversy. The whole Church was involved in resolving it, but the apostles and elders took the lead in all the proceedings (Acts 15:4,6) They allowed public debate, including the presentation of the opposing view (Acts 15:5,7). The chief leaders within the leadership council brought the matters to a conclusion so that all the leaders could “become of one mind” (15:25). The final decision was the decision of the apostles, the elders, the whole church, and the Holy Spirit: “Then it seemed good to the apostles and the elders, with the whole church, to choose men from among them to send to Antioch….’For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay upon you no greater burden than these essentials’”(15:22,28).
From theses two examples, it is clear that the leadership body takes the lead from the congregation, and that the congregation participates. Depending on the circumstances, the leaders wisely use different procedures and strategies to help the congregation solve problems and make decisions.

I can’t see this ever happening in TSA - it is too big an organisation and its interests diversify far beyond the church environment. How, then, could TSA avoid such tragic errors of judgment in the future, given that the setup appears to be unbiblical, in that there is no direct contact between IHQ leaders at one end and the people at corps level at the other end, an no avenue to bridge that gap? I realise that this question may not be appropriate for this blog, but the Howard hospital subject troubles me greatly, and I believe there is a relevance in inquiring about the leadership’s autocratic role in it.