![]() |
KARANDA MISSION HOSPITAL |
The FSAOF will conclude our series on the HH/Thistle tragedy
in 3 days. Dr. Paul Thistle and his family have returned to Zimbabwe and the
Karanda Mission Hospital where he’s already donned his surgical gown, mask and
gloves.
The below are but a portion of the comments posted on the SA
Canada’s site almost a year ago. Sadly, there has been no update by the SA at
any level. Consequently, there is reason for encouragement, joy or immediate
hope.
We'll be creating a Prayer Wall of support on FaceBook today.
We report - you decide
_____________________________
Our
International Headquarters confirms that Howard Hospital is operating with two
doctors plus other medical staff. A plan is in place for the future of the
hospital and while this facility is International in nature, we remain
committed to supporting its work. In fact, a container with medical supplies
valued at more than $300,000 is already en route to Zimbabwe.
Some responses
to the article: ‘SA in Canada remains committed to Howard Hospital’
Posted on August
23, 2012 in Newswire
Having trained
in Zimbabwe with Dr. Thistle as my preceptor I can assure you that nobody is nearly
as competent or hard working as he is. He is a man with an undeniable passion
for medicine and cares for people like no other. Taking him away from Howard is
a crime. I think we can all agree that there is corruption within the ranks of
SA Zim. I think we can go further to say that this corruption influenced IHQ.
And finally, I think we can all agree that SA Canada is aware of what is going
on but too afraid to admit it and bring this SA scandal into the spotlight.…
Tina and David
Ivany
This is an
absolute disgrace. Paul and Pedrinah, our cousins, have done all the work to
keep this hospital running under the direst circumstances. Only now, after
their “re-assignment” – a lovely sanitized word-play to disguise the real
situation, does the Army IHQ suggest investigating the corruption on site. Only
now, after years of underfunding, does it talk about “enhanced future
investment in the hospital” – words that Dr. Thistle and his team have waited
years to hear. Paul does not need to be re-acclimatized to Canada.
Unfortunately, there is only one Dr. Paul Thistle and his heart is with his
patients in Zimbabwe. Let him go, and you will never see the likes of him
again.
Elizabeth Argent
Once again,
shame on the Army! This morning in our church bulletin is yet another piece of
propaganda under the guise of a press release ensuring members of the SA that
all is well and good and going according to plan with HH and Dr. Thistle. This
could not be farther from the truth. They continue to assert that it’s business
as usual at HH. This is nothing short off a lie. The $300 thousand shipment is
no longer going over as they claim. Which, by the way is not a SA donation of
medicines and supplies but a donation made by doctors from the Trillium
hospital-the SA is only responsible for the $15 thousand shipping costs- that
shipment has now understandably been pulled.
Gay Pratt
This is
too little to late. Where was the IHQ and THQ when all this was happening. How
could the IHQ allow HQ in Zimbabwe to put Capt(Dr.) P Thistle through what they
have. IHQ must have known about the corruption and money missing or arriving
too late. As for the Howard Hospital functioning without Dr. Thistle, Do you
not listen to the news??? I have been to Howard Hospital, because of the SA
lack of backbone, people are dying, and suffering, Nurses have been arrested,
hospital equipment stolen. All because of certain Zim SA personnel who have a
personal vendetta against Paul. Even the Government of Zimbabwe has wanted Paul
to remain at Howard. Amazing that our own SA took so long to get involved. Here
is a man who has given the SA the best PR they could have, He has been honored
by his peers he is a humble and dedicated physician and officer and where is the
SA support for him when he needed it. It is outside the SA that Paul received help
I am embarrassed to be SA…
Jennifer Reid
When I first
went to Howard Hospital in 2001 I was struck by how old and dilapidated its
buildings are, windows with no screens let alone glass, peeling paint,
out-dated equipment, empty supply shelves. People line up for care, and then
again for medication (which often runs out), and family members sleep on the
floors beside patients’’ beds. And yet, those ramshackle buildings were filled
with life and hope and service. On day two of my visit, I was shown “the new
Howard Hospital”, a fine expansive building, with fresh walls and wiring and
plumbing for updated medical facility. I was told that a Salvation Army donor
had left millions of dollars to build this new hospital that the people so
desperately need. So what happened to this new Howard Hospital?
Somehow, those
millions of dollars given to the SA “ran out.” The buildings are there, but are
as empty as a ghost town, right beside the old hospital which pulses with life.
They’re now becoming dilapidated from non-use and neglect, and the Zimbabwean
authorities declared it unfit for use in 2006, but you’ll not find a single
word about this in any SA press statement. Such massive waste and mismanagement
of donor dollars.
I was teaching
clinical midwifery at Howard in 2001 and we were asking Canadians to donate $4
so that we could administer AIDS drugs to women in labour to prevent spread of
HIV to their babies. We knew the women were going to die because there were no
AIDS medications available then, but the babies were more likely to be adopted
by other families if they were HIV-negative. The people see the new hospital,
empty, and reports from people in Zimbabwe are saying that service provision in
the old hospital is a shell of its former self since the Thistles left. And
people there seem to be talking about corruption in the handling of funds, and
how unfair it is to them that the Thistles have been forced out. Lives are at
stake. Is it really okay with all of us that the same people who allowed the
“slippage” of the new hospital funds to do this investigation? Doesn’t SA need
outside assistance to get to the bottom of it? And if it’s not a personal
vendetta against the Thistles, why do they have to leave while the
investigation is occurring? Lives are at stake and the right actions need to be
taken.
Brian Nichols
The word I have
had today from inside Howard Hospital is that only one doctor remains, there are
only 2 patients in the hospital and no medicine in the pharmacy. This is a
hospital that normally averages more than 300 patients per day. Where is the
truth? I have been told that $18,000. worth of building supplies that were
purchased with money raised in our Peterborough community have been looted. We
know by whom. People are dying unnecessarily. Wake up to what is happening here
and stop sending out false information.
John Sullivan
My parents were
missionary-officers in Africa. I was born there, am a former officer, and for
the past fifty years have been a minister in the United Church of Canada. I
have been the senior minister of some of the largest congregations in the
denomination, and at eighty, I am still active, serving a rural charge. I have
become aware that a large contribution to Howard has been made by one of our
United Churches and handed directly to the administrator at Howard. The church
is requesting that the money be returned until the issue of Dr. Thistle is
resolved. The officer-administrator is named in the report, and the church has
tried to contact him without success. All someone would need to do from that
particular congregation is to report it to the United Church Observer and
suggest they write an article about it. United Church people are encouraged to
divide their tithe money in half, with half going to the local and national
church, and the other half to charities of their choice. In the past when the
national church hears of mismanagement of funds by non-government organizations
they inform our members and adherents not to support the charity. Because UCC
members are undoubtedly the largest contributors to TSA, and the readership of
the Observer is largely made up of those in their later years, a directive from
the national church would be all they would need to remove the Army from their
wills, and to refrain from donating annually as they have in the past. The
Canadian territory therefore needs to be more transparent to the public and
more supportive of Dr. Thistle, who is considered by many to be a Salvation
Army Mother Teresa.
Alison Tennent August 25,
2012 at 11:10 am It is an absolute
disgrace what has happened to Dr. Thistle at Howard Hospital recently. I am not
a member of the Salvation Army, but I am a physician
(obstetrician/gynecologist) who has volunteered at Howard on 4 separate
occasions. I just got back from Howard Hospital in July after working there for
3 months. I know the situation on the ground there very well. Your press
release that says that the hospital is functioning well is completely
inaccurate. When I was there, the hospital was busting at the seams, stretched
beyond capacity with sick patients. The only reason it was staying afloat was
because of the extraordinary efforts of one man, Dr. Paul Thistle. He was
working ridiculous hours, seeing over a hundred patients a day and doing complex
surgeries. On top of that he was doing the duties that the hospital
administration should have been taking care of. It was quite obvious when I was
there that the hospital administrator was completely incompetent and downright
obstructive. How can you say that the hospital is running well with 2 doctors?
What nonsense is that? I know these 2 doctors. They are not obstetricians or
surgeons. They are general doctors. Dr Thistle is formally trained as an
obstetrician and gynecologist, who has done extra training in general surgery,
oncology surgery, urology surgery, complex wound management. How many of these
types of doctors (with the surgical skills of Paul Thistle) do you have waiting
in your ranks to replace him?
The decision to
transfer him back to Canada with one month notice (and then later at 48 hours
notice) is an irresponsible and downright dangerous decision. You cannot
replace a doctor like that without at least a 6 months transition period with
him and the new doctor both in place. I know for a fact that many women in that
region will die of complications of pregnancy because he is not there. And
where are all the sick and dying patients right now that I saw in the other
wards? They are not at Howard; that has been confirmed. There are hardly any
patients in the hospital right now. I can tell you they are not in Harare; they
cannot afford the transport or the hospital fees. I urge you to wake up. Stop
trying to protect your organization and focus your investigations on where the
real problem lies, the leadership at the SA Territorial headquarters in Harare,
specifically Commissioner Chigariro. Get Dr. Thistle back to Howard as soon as
possible so more people in the Chiweshe region don’t die and suffer
unnecessarily.
Elizabeth Argent
This whole situation
is tragic and what is even more disturbing to me is the stand that the Army has
taken with respect to Dr. Thistle, a well respected, hard working, honest, man.
Today I am sad to be a Salvationist. The Army leadership who steadfastly sticks
to its pat politically correct press releases and slick responses needs to
stand up against the systemic corruption that thrives at Howard and within the
Leadership in Zimbabwe….
Shirley Watkinson
I have read
these comments, and am so sad that the SA is so ‘cold’ and seemingly
indifferent to the people that come to HH for assistance. So much for ‘we
care’, since ‘we’ don’t…. I have also been to HH and know about the long hours
and devotion that Paul has for these people. He is a true Christian man….so
where are all the others who are supposed to support him? Where are his
superior (in name only, please) officers that have made this decision to simply
pull him out and leave about 250,000 people without medical care? and hope? SW
Lorna Rogers
Simard
You are telling
people above, “If you have questions, we would suggest contacting The Salvation
Army in Zimbabwe, or contacting our International Headquarters.” I contacted
the Zim territory last week and have had no response. Now their THQ website has
been removed from the web. When you type into your browser http://www.SalvationArmyZim.org.
Up comes a box saying Bad Request – Invalid Host Name – so how are people to
contact them now. as for IHQ, many people have emailed them with questions and
comments and they just refer emails to the Canadian THQ and replies are
received from THQ here – IHQ remains silent.
This seems like
an internal SA 3 ring circus – IHQ deflecting emails to THQ Canada, and Canada
telling people to contact IHQ and the Zim territory which has their website
removed from the web. Ultimately the buck starts and stops with IHQ but we are
all praying that SA leadership does the right thing in this situation and put
the Thistle’s ASAP back at the Howard.
John Sullivan
It saddens me to
know that United Church people, who have made large contributions to the work
of the Howard Hospital, have had to ask that the money be returned, until the
issue with Captain Dr. Thistle has been resolved. Instead of their concern
being treated with sensitivity, the only response to their request, and the
heartfelt pleas of others who have written to this site, is for the tambourine
to be held out asking for more money! Why would anyone in their right mind make
a contribution to THQ, knowing that it would be sent on to IHQ, which would
send it on to THQ Zim, with the knowledge that some of it would disappear
before it reached the hospital?
Kim MacDonad
I too worked as
a physician at Howard Hospital for three months this past year. You won’t find
a more dedicated, kinder or skilled physician in Zimbabwe, or pretty much
anywhere. You don’t replace Paul Thistle, or go on at Howard Hospital without
him, you can’t. This statement from the Salvation Army is marketing smooth talk
and diversion, nothing more.
They either have
no idea at the incompetence and corruption that is occurring at the
administrative level at Howard Hospital, or don’t care.
I encourage
Canadians, and caring citizens everywhere, to speak in number with your
donations. Send them to reputable, professional and sincere international
organizations. There are many to choose from, but the Salvation Army has shown
from its handling of this matter, that they are not one of them. Demand answers
as to where your money has gone. Ask why it has been stolen by members of the
Salvation Army. There are hundreds of us that have volunteered money and time
to the people of Zimbabwe. We know the community and hospital well. There is
nothing humanitarian, Christian or right about this entire matter.
Marit Kalvo and
Annlaug Teigene
We are shocked
and do not understand that the Salvation Army has removed Dr. Thistle from
Howard Hospital. A man that has dedicated his whole life to helping and
treating sick and poor people. A man that worked hard in the hospital from
early morning to late evening every day and spent most of his spare time
getting sponsors and donations to Howard Hospital. Without him the hospital
would not have had medicines and medical equipment for treating patients during
the eighteen years he worked there. Since 2002 we have been at Howard Hospital
every year for short and long periods, working as voluntary anesthetists. We
know well both the hospital, workers and the community. In addition to working
at the hospital we organize a Norwegian aid program, helping more than 100
children and young people by paying their school fees. During one of our stays
at Howard Hospital we were surprised to learn that the Salvation Army does not
contribute economically to Howard Hospital. Rather, the local Salvation Army
drains money from the hospital. We have witnessed the administrators and other
SA officers stealing from the hospital. We wrote a letter to International SA
in London about this affair. Nothing was done. And now they have removed he who
contributed and sacrificed. It is good to hear that SA Canada is sending
medical supplies. We hope they are necessary medicines and medical supplies, as
a lot of not usable supplies are sent. We know that medical supplies are
constantly in demand at Howard Hospital. But who shall do the surgery when Dr.
Thistle is no longer at the hospital? The two Zim doctors are not surgeons.
They work at Out Patient and with medical treatment. Our last stay at Howard
Hospital was in April/May this year. At the time there were between 10 and 15
operations a day, many complicated cases that only Dr. Thistle can operate. To
carry out advanced surgery at a hospital like Howard, with so little medical
equipment, requires a very experienced and skilled surgeon, like Paul Thistle.
Susan Heder
All my life, I
have respected the Salvation Army, and though I am United Church, have
supported the very necessary and practical work of the Salvation Army with
personal donations, and persuading other organizations to donate. My husband
and I were at Howard Hospital in 1998, and even then, a much younger Dr.
Thistle was highly respected. So ours has been a very long supportive
relationship with Howard Hospital, largely due to the confidence we had in the
integrity of Dr. Thistle and the Salvation Army. My faith in the Salvation Army
has been deeply shaken by their actions with respect to the Thistles and Howard
Hospital. I will continue to follow this situation with great interest,
particularly watching for how the Salvation Army in Zimbabwe, International,
and in Canada, will redeem their reputation with the public. I wonder what God
thinks of all this. May God watch out for the people of Chiweshe, the greatest
losers in all this controversy. Wonderful as they are, the Thistles will
continue to live. But some people in Chiweshe will die. Shame on some of the
people (not all) in the Salvation Army.
A friend from
Zimbabwe and I just started a group called Zimbabweans and Canadians for Howard
Hospital” on Facebook. Here’s the description; “This group is for Zimbabweans,
Canadians, and others who believe that Howard Hospital is a very special place
where the community and the hospital staff have worked together as a team over
many hardship years, to provide successful health programs that work for the
Zimbabwean people. The mountains were tough to climb, but the Howard staff and
lots of community volunteers set up great services for very difficult
challenges, like HIV and TB, maternal and child mortality, malnutrition, and
AIDS orphans. They found ways to provide peer-based counselling, youth
leadership, and volunteer homecare workers for dying patients. Sadly, last
month the team was broken apart…. key staff were suddenly removed. So lets
share strategies to bring back the right staff for the job!” Let me know if you
want to join…. we would really like our Salvationist friends to help us know
what to do! http://www.facebook.com/#!/jennifer.reid.1217
Derere
Last Sunday, the
local citadel, Nyachuru, had less than 20 of the more than 800 soldiers
attending the services. probably a boycott…
jenn reid
I just heard
that people have lost trust in TSA’s commitment to the region, and some are
turning to traditional healers for treatment. If patients receiving AIDS &
/ or TB meds go off their medications, they run the risk of developing
disease-resistant strains which can rapidly spread.
_______________________
Do you have any
current information on the programmes that Dr Thistle initiated - the ARVs in
particular? Or the schools initiative? Or the effects that his leaving has had
on the community?
Also, there's
the IHQ statement of October last - Major Pallant gave some assurances, but
there's been no subsequent verification or otherwise whether the assurances
have been carried out.
Here then, the
commitments made!
TSA issued a
statement on 26th October 2012, where it stated that:
Howard Hospital
is highly valued by the Salvation Army which remains committed to the
continuing development of health services in that community.
Question: how
has that commitment translated into progress since Dr Thistle left?
Question: What
is the current position on a successor to Dr Thistle?
The statement
said that the dismissal of Dr Thistle was seen to be ‘an opportunity for Howard
Hospital to receive some new leadership’.
Question: why
was his replacement not in place when at least two years’ planning had gone
into the move?
The statement
said ‘we will be improving our services at Howard Hospital. So we can give
these assurances to the community at Chiweshe’.
Question: What
improvements have been made to date?
The statement
said that TSA would ‘work on the completion of the new Howard Hospital and we
are strongly hoping that the new hospital will be finished by the end of 2013’.
Question: Are
these plans progressing? Reports on the Internet refute this fact.
The statement
said that ‘the commitment to the Tauriro Clinic and the ARV programme is
absolutely there. We can report that the clinical review showed that we have
all the drugs for ARV; that patients can receive those and there will be a
continuity of care.
Question: IS
that continuity of care taking place currently?
The statement
said ‘we have had funding from USAID for children at school and every
indication is that this is continuing’.
Question: Can
you confirm that this is continuing?
The statement
said ‘I was discussing just yesterday with some donors about bringing new
equipment for HH’.
Question: Has
that come to fruition? If so, what was the equipment that was provided?
The statement
said ‘we assure the people of the Chiweshe community that The Salvation Army is
committed to working with them to improve their quality of life and health’.
Question: How
is this being enacted today?
NO RESPONSE WHATSOEVER FROM ANY SA SOURCE
41 comments:
Are all these postings not 12 months old now? Is there nothing new to report?
I think the last sentence says it: No response from the Salvation Army at all. They are the only ones who can update this at the moment - at least the Roman Catholics and the Anglicans have the honour and humility to apologise for errors made. Have you seen anything inside TSA organisation that tells of problems, or mistakes, or struggles? I haven't. It's all self congratulatory stuff - odd or what, as we are supposed to be engaging in the war against sin and wickedness. TSA has lost its pioneering spirit. I fear we are 'too long at ease in Zion' these days.
But - the very fact that there are so many people visiting this site shows that the troops are at least becoming alive and alert to what the leaders are doing in their name.
Most of the comments range in age from 11 to 9 months. No, nothing new to report except that the Thistle family is now back 'home' in Zimbabwe, and that we've created a Prayer Wall...
There is a value in showing these reports from last year - it shows to the whole SA world that people for a year have been speaking out against what TSA has done to no avail and that IHQ has remained silent, other than the occasional report from their two spin doctors Majors Dean Pallant and John Murray.
Well said.
Learned that this series is coming to a close? Your choice or pressure from your fellowship Sven?
SA UK
'Learned'? - it says so at the top of the article
A classical example of what happens when vital life giving oxygen is not being applied or cut off - the breath of life slips away and the story/ issue eventually becomes lifeless and limp.
What has happened here is the flogging of a dead horse - or the flogging of a horse to death - total overkill, trying to whip up interest where there was none in the first place inside the English speaking immediate spheres of potential 'interest'.
The repetitive nature of tens of thousands of words is boring and people soon lose interest when there is nothing fresh to report. The number of comments to any article rarely goes above 40 - often far less - and then by a rather limited group of posters who are not really representative of total FSAOF membership, I include myself in this.
In a sense it is all good entertainment to see how people inter-relate and how gullible some are and react emotionally without having a balanced, overall perspective.
In an other sense, there has been a not so clever game played here by some to achieve their own ends through others - the proverbial passing of bullets for others to load and fire. That is not pretty stuff!
The story of HH and Dr Thistle was, is and remains a sad saga and as various parties have worked towards a satisfactory conclusion over the past 12 months, may all move on from strength to strength.
The art is not to take any private blog too seriously. Usually there is a hidden agenda somewhere. If you do then you could easily become manipulated and eventually the manipulator of others.
Have a nice day, the sun is shining on all!;);)
'In a sense it is all good entertainment ' - not for the people of Chiweshe, it isn't. Shameful comment.
"various parties have worked towards a satisfactory conclusion over the past 12 months'. Haven't read anything about this, except spin and smoke and mirrors from TSA. I would think that if it HAD been resolved satisfactorily, there wouldn't be this eerie silence from IHQ - they'd be shouting it from the rooftops. TSA is a VERY boastful organisation. You won't read anything other than positives in their publications.
If there IS news about Howard hospital, it would be very good to hear about it. I won't hold my breath.
"Good Entertainment"refers to comments made from certain people not the overall issue!
Read the whole comment before offering a knee jerk reaction.
Sorry - I saw nothing in the 'whole comment' that was sympathetic to the HH cause. 'Flogging a dead horse', 'boring', 'manipulative' - it wasn't a knee jerk reaction. I am one of the many people who have only recently heard about this event, and I am appalled at the salvation army leadership. I don't belong to the FSAOF, I am not an officer, but I do care for people and their welfare, and I'm glad that this series has been posted - it gives the rank and file an insight into the chasm that exists between the leaders and the rest of us.
I have since learned that it isn't the only case of its kind where the SA is concerned, and it is good that a series like this can open our eyes as members. I'm sure we all think that the global SA is a fantastic organisation that is, in the main, 'doing the most good', but we do need to be told about the shortcomings as well. It's not healthy for the membership of any organisation to be kept in the dark about their failings.
Companies have shareholders - they are told about anything in the company that is causing concern, and they are given the opportunity to air their views at shareholders meetings. SA membership are not given either of those privileges - we're not told about the concerns, and neither are we given any opportunity for saying what we think about them. We exist in a bubble of 'Army' perfection.
At least this website is prepared to 'do the unthinkable' and air the sordid facts of this appalling case, and to give us, the people, an awareness of what is being done on our behalf by leaders who should have handled this with far more spiritual finesse, and with far more consideration for the tragic effects of their decision.
If you are not, as you say, sympathetic to this 'rather limited group of posters who are not really representative of total FSAOF membership', then that is up to your conscience. But events like this cannot go unchallenged, and we must all stand up for people who have no voice.
Is that because you did not, want not or could not see beyond the 'flogging,boring, manipulative'? Read the whole entry again in context. Good reading is an art! Selective reading is not.
I find the last anonymous poster to be arrogant. I don't know on what grounds you feel the right to pass judgement on the "art of reading".
Personally, I wonder why you, Critical Anonymous, continue to come to the blog. You find nothing here that is pleasing to you, and you are on your platform, decrying the content, the style, the methods. You, Critical Anonymous, may be one person or many. But, if all content on here is as fruitless, worthless, repetative, manipulative and soon to die from lack of interest as you keep claiming, I can't help but wonder why you DO keep coming back. To what end? For what purpose?
Unless, of course, you are someone(s) who have something to lose as more and more people hear about this. Perhaps you are witnessing the beginning of a season of accountability which you dread.
But for whatever reason, more people are hearing. More people are reading. More people are sharing with others in the corps, in their divisions, in their territories.
I personally share a link to each blog entry on my Facebook page. I know that at least the topic is seen by current, former and retired SA officers, fellow Salvationists, and non-Salvationist friends. And for every person that links the blog post on their Facebook page, the circle of exposure grows larger.
So, continue to come back, oh critical anonymous one(s). I would hate for you to miss what comes next.
To what end and purpose? It is informative, entertaining and above all fun to see how people react to any subject and then inter-act with eachother. Lighten up, smile, be happy in Jesus and keep integrity intact.
As one with a clear conscience before God, no condemnation now I dread ofcourse from any source.
Btw.... I am so pleased that you still want me to keep actively visiting this blog....I might just do that from time to time but now I have got a calling and ministry to fulfill with holidays. ('Vacation' for those in the colonies) over.
Remember, the rain soaks the just and not so just in equal measure;);)
'As one with a clear conscience before God' - really? My conscience is never clear - how fortunate you are.
One's 'conscience' can't exist as complete or in a state of perfection - it reacts to events as they happen - either your 'conscience' is pricked by them, or it is not. For you to state that yours is clear would mean that you aren't moved by any of what is contained in these articles and blogs.
I do hope your holiday clears your head and moves you to compassion for those less fortunate - those who just exist from day to day, like the people of Chiweshe - for whom a holiday is just a distant dream. As Christians, that is what we are about - caring, not making glib comments that are devoid of feeling.
'As one with a clear conscience before God' - really? My conscience is never clear - how fortunate you are.'
Yes....'my soul has found a resting place, and I am now, through heavenly grace, at peace with God....how rich am I such wealth possessing' - SASB 536
A clear conscience before God = being at peace with God!
Ah, yes - Richard Slater, the father of Salvation Army music. Wasn't he cloistered in the SA musical department for over 60 years writing his many songs? I doubt if he had the euphoric clarity of conscience spoken of above - most of his more contemplative songs had the same theme, which shows that he wasn't content with a level of service once attained - he always wanted to confess more, to give more, to be sanctified, to strive to be better for his Lord. Not for him the 'clear conscience' - he realised the importance of the 9th doctrine - that continuance in a state of salvation depended on continued obedient faith in Christ. 'Continued' being the operative word. He also wrote song 225.
Afar from God thy feet have wandered
Afar from God thy soul has strayed:
His gifts in sin thy hand has squandered
And yet in love He calls thee home.
God is near thee, tell thy story:
He will hear thy tale of sorrow:
God is near thee, and in mercy
He will welcome thy return.
I could go on - the thorny way of sin, the vain pleasures of the heart, weary and entombed in the gloom of despair, a broken heart, a heart of deep grief - doesn't sound like a man at peace with God to me. Which goes to show - a spiritual state and one's conscience are not static - they change with our experiences. If we had all attained clarity of conscience, what's the point in striving?
Conscience - the moral sense of right and wrong - should always move us to question what is done in our name.
The Howard Hospital sits uneasily with my conscience - I cannot reconcile the SA leadership's course of action with those of a loving God who cares for the welfare of all His children.
Thank you for your interesting take on Richard Slater...who served for 30 years in the musical department....remember that song 225 was not meant to be introspective but for the one who still had to find peace with God - that is why it is in the 'invitation' section and song 536 in the 'praise and thanksgiving' holiness enjoyed arena.
For me, the euphoric clarity about him being at peace with God lie in the penned words of the chorus of 536. Otherwise, why pen them in the first place?;);)
Not really bothered about Richard Slater and his sheltered spiritual life - his was a different era in any case - but like I said, the songs were written at different times in his life and hints of inner turmoil are there, otherwise he wouldn't have penned those words either - he would have stuck to the many happy-clappy ones that we are blessed/cursed with, depending on your musical preference. Hymn/songwriters rarely pen words of 'advice' - they are usually written because of some experiential events in their own lives. After all, if they are words of 'advice' - that could be construed as being judgmental on people who are perceived by the writer as living lives that fall short of God's requirements.
Meanwhile, while we engage in this amusing 'spat', the people of Chiweshe are still worse off than they were a year ago, babies are allegedly being born to face a life with HIV which could have been avoided, they have no surgeon to heal them, Dr Thistle remains sacked for acting in a biblical way and going to his spiritual leaders with an issue that he felt needed addressing, the good ol' SA has broken links to significant websites and hidden the history of the Howard Hospital from prying eyes, IHQ is asking itself 'which way are we going' (Youth Songs - blue book - advice to children) on their now infamous conflicting press releases, and sections of the soldiery are asking questions of them regarding integrity that they appear unwilling to answer.
You enjoy your soul's peace - me, I'll go on striving. Be blessed.
And you, stay blessed ;);)
This blog is fun, lightens my day no end....
"This blog is fun" - previous poster.
FUN????
A few years ago I had a "feminine cancer" and, even with the most excellent medical care, it was FAR from FUN!
And these people, many also in extremity, have been left without a surgeon for over a year! FUN?
I can't imagine how they must feel.
I haven't the words to describe what I think of you or your warped sense of humour. Hope you are never in the same situation as these poor African folk!
Hear, hear! Well said. The poster must keep the same indifferent company as the silent circle at IHQ.
Of course its fun, this blog is certainly amusing, especially some of the responses! Get a sense of perspective, be discerning and don't treat this or yourselves too seriously..... for your own good and health. After all, it is easy to get manipulated on the internet, including (especially?) religious sites.
To Anonymous who posted: "After all, it is easy to get manipulated on the internet, including (especially?) religious sites."
I guess this statement would apply to all the press statements and other information posted on the internet by The Salvation Army.
After all, their press statements about Howard Hospital were meant to manipulate, were they not?
"I guess this statement would apply to all the press statements and other information posted on the internet by The Salvation Army."
Absolutely true yet in the case of HH there has been next to nothing posted by the SA....remember: 'dead silence!'
This is probably the biggest bug bear for those outside the 'need to know' loop on SAFOF site to contend with. The unwillingness by the SA to interact on not their own terms is to ensure that nothing can be taken out of context - as it sure has the habit of doing.
Silence is golden
The least publicly said, the soonest things will be allowed to get dealt with and moved on
I don't believe people are calling for any heart-wrenching confessions - all I see on here is people's concern for the welfare of helpless people who are being condemned to a life hardly worth living because of TSA's intransigence and the fact that it ISN'T moving on to try to help and improve the quality of life for these poor people. Stubbornness and pride are a big barrier to moving forward. Sometimes the way of humility is best. it was good enough for Jesus - not for TSA, apparently.
This must be a first for any Christian setup - the troops calling for more practical Christianity from the leaders.
To the person who said 'silence is golden' - I read this on the internet, from Counterthought.org, written by Don Enevoldsen, writing in his series in which he is questioning church authority:
***Silence is a primary tool of concealment, and is usually implemented by whatever means are available, no matter how unethical they might be.
The most immediate lesson is that the phrase, “Silence is golden,” is most often spoken by people who have ugly things to hide, attitudes and behaviors that they want neither exposed or changed. …..The reason is simple. They don’t like having their corruption brought to any kind of accountability.
'Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God. (John 3:20-21)
Any time a leader preaches that silence is golden, there is likely something sinister to hide. ***
If TSA really has nothing to hide in this matter, then let them say so. Silence is not always golden.
"Any time a leader preaches that silence is golden, there is likely something sinister to hide."
That is a terrible negative!
Now a positive:
Silence is golden
Meaning
A proverbial saying, often used in circumstances where it is thought that saying nothing is preferable to speaking.
Keeping one's mouth shut is a great virtue, as in Don't tell anyone else about it silence is golden . Although this precise phrase was first recorded only in 1848, it is part of a much older proverb, "Speech is silver and silence is golden."
I know what I prefer to preach!
Perhaps you'd like to read the series 'Counterthought.org'
It's a revelation.
I had never heard of this guy before. It seems that he got badly burned in prosperity gospel teaching environments over a prolonged period of active involvement at top level.
Silence is more often that not golden in conjunction with an engaged brain and having the ability to find the correct moment and place, rather than shooting wildly from the hip. I call it 'actively waiting' with ears and eyes wide open and mouth firmly shut. This usually provides that extra bit of rope with which people hang themselves well and truly. This is far preferable and profitable over any other method in my humble opinion;);)
I don't think anyone is 'shooting wildly from the hip'. The HH issue is a 'specific' and there are 'specific' issues that TSA needs to address if it is going to regain the trust of the soldiery. None of this is wild speculation. It is all verified in fact. TSA has shown a dire dereliction of duty towards the Thistles, the Chiweshe people and the members who make up TSA.
At the moment this is being talked about at corps level, albeit quietly among people who have read this blog, and you can guarantee that once one person has read it he or she will tell someone else etc. At my corps the number of people 'in the know' is increasing - the corps officers apparently 'do not know anything' - I suppose the leadership structure and their 'challenge us and you're out' policy will understandably deter officers who rely on TSA for their livelihood - so it is only a matter of time before we will get together and raise the matter at a higher level.
I suppose that is what we are doing - 'actively waiting'. But that can only be temporary in a humanitarian issue such as this, where the suffering is ongoing.
I'm glad you qualified your 'silence is golden' mantra with 'silence is more often than not golden', because clearly silence has a time limit in this case. I'm not really sure from reading the above whose 'side' you are on, or to whom you refer when you speak about the extra bit of rope with which people hang themselves, but from the reactions to this sad saga it's clear to me that TSA are not doing themselves any favours by their restorative procrastination and their continued refusal to address the issue with truth, integrity and practical support for these people, whose 'suffering humanity' are exactly those we are supposed to serve. Leaders talk about serving suffering humanity all the time. Why is it making an exception for these people?
My reading is that the contributor was talking generally rather than specifically about a single issue such as HH.
People usually have the habit of self destructing - hanging themselves - by saying far too much and not being discerning enough when to keep mouth firmly shut. Try getting toothpaste back into a tube after squirting it out first!
Whether a time limit should be applied, i do not know but patience certainly is a great virtue. God often has appeared to be stone deaf to many people in desperate survival mode. What is time anyway? The still small voice is usually the most potent one that people will listen to, not the spouting mouth one.
'Challenge us and you will be out policy?'
I do not think it works so simply that way when constructive criticism is given . Whether people will listen and take heed is another matter. Where there is pure negative bloodymindedness being displayed, including defamatation of character and undermining of stated positions and authority it is usually the protractor who makes his or her position untenable themselves.
It is when matters get out of hand and become personal and no longer focussed on the issue itself, that is when prudent people will distance themselves - just as whst has happened recently on this blog when certain key members withdrew. The owner of this blog called them 'flip floppers' in one of his posts.
'It is when matters get out of hand and become personal and no longer focussed on the issue itself' - I'm not sure what is meant here.
I guess some people on this site probably know each other- it is, after all, a private blog, and the means of fellowship for former officers - but this series of blogs concerning the Howard hospital, the Thistles and IHQ etc has attracted a much wider audience - mainly made up of SA members who are horrified at the details and, in the absence of any other neutral medium, have wished to make their views known. Now these views may not be complimentary to TSA and its leaders, and they may not always be phrased sensitively, but I wouldn't think for one moment they were meant to be personal attacks. As one of the (effectively) disenfranchised rank and file members of TSA, I have never met any of the Army hierarchy, except for a brief impersonal handshake with General Linda Bond at a rally once which doesn't really count - but I have been shocked at what has happened in this case, and it is indisputable that individuals in IHQ made the decisions that have cause this furore. Individual IHQ Officers have issued defensive statements that have been conflicting, but just because they are named doesn't make any comments personal - it's like the Bible says 'Hate the sin but love the sinner'. It is the deed that we abhor - I doubt if many of us have any feelings personally for the officer staff at IHQ, purely because we don't know them.
And, an important point to note is that if TSA had quickly put into place some measures to compensate for their errors of judgment regarding HH, no-one would have known any of these facts – it could so easily have been different. I believe it’s called ‘damage limitation’. This hasn’t happened, to my knowledge.
So - to say that people are being personally attacked is, I think, a clever way of deflecting the focus away from the heart of the matter. Dr Paul Thistle is fortunate in that he is now free to practice medicine without the internal politics of TSA to contend with as well. But for the poor people at HH the misery goes on. And that is why members are frustrated – because, to us, the Army is seen as being hypocritical by not practising in this case what it preaches to the world.
The blogger who talked about ‘undermining stated positions and authority’.
Authority is power, which can be used either to dictate and segregate, or to arbitrate and empower. Authority is necessary, of course, especially in an organisation such as ours, but no authority should be without accountability, because without accountability, authority is authoritarian, and in a church environment this can't be healthy.
I don't think TSA has arbitrated or empowered in this instance.
There has to be a better way.
With 2020 hindsight there is always a better way!
And regrets, no doubt.
often, but not always of course
We do have issues within TSA about the role of our leaders, which have been highlighted by the Zimbabwe events - we are not set up in accordance with the New Testament church structure. Take the following statements. For 'elders' substitute 'SA leaders':
The goal of the elders and congregation should always be to speak and act as a united community. Both the leaders and the led should take time and effort to work & pray together to achieve this unity. Elders must inoculate themselves against aloofness, secrecy, or independently seeking their own direction. Godly elders want to involve every member of the body in the joy of living together as God's family. This requires free and open communication between elders and congregation.
The first Christian congregation shows us examples of a leadership council and congregation working together in decision-making and problem solving. In Acts 6, when conflicts broke out between the Hebrew and Hellenistic widows in the congregation over the fair distribution of funds, the leadership council immediately devised a plan of resolution. They called the congregation together and presented their plan. The congregation approved it, which called for them to choose seven men to take responsibility for the care of all the church widows. After the men were chosen, the apostles officially placed them in charge of the poor by the laying on of hands and prayer.
In Acts 15, the congregation in Jerusalem was confronted with serious doctrinal controversy. The whole Church was involved in resolving it, but the apostles and elders took the lead in all the proceedings (Acts 15:4,6) They allowed public debate, including the presentation of the opposing view (Acts 15:5,7). The chief leaders within the leadership council brought the matters to a conclusion so that all the leaders could “become of one mind” (15:25). The final decision was the decision of the apostles, the elders, the whole church, and the Holy Spirit: “Then it seemed good to the apostles and the elders, with the whole church, to choose men from among them to send to Antioch….’For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay upon you no greater burden than these essentials’”(15:22,28).
From theses two examples, it is clear that the leadership body takes the lead from the congregation, and that the congregation participates. Depending on the circumstances, the leaders wisely use different procedures and strategies to help the congregation solve problems and make decisions.
I can’t see this ever happening in TSA - it is too big an organisation and its interests diversify far beyond the church environment. How, then, could TSA avoid such tragic errors of judgment in the future, given that the setup appears to be unbiblical, in that there is no direct contact between IHQ leaders at one end and the people at corps level at the other end, an no avenue to bridge that gap? I realise that this question may not be appropriate for this blog, but the Howard hospital subject troubles me greatly, and I believe there is a relevance in inquiring about the leadership’s autocratic role in it.
Post a Comment