The Charges levied against Captain (Dr.) Paul Thistle
▪
Not following strict
Salvation Army protocols regarding donation remittance (there is no suggestion
that moneys were not properly submitted to the SA)
▪
◦
Those accusing
Thistle were also guilty of sidestepping protocol-SA regulation
◦
▪
Not following
CRA (Canada Revenue Agency) protocols regarding donations as it pertained to
monies donated by IFHH and other Canadian donor groups
◦
Canadian
officials were aware of the circumstances and did not voice or register any
complaints
Disobeying orders from THQ and IHQ.
◦
This charge is
not disputed. Dr. Thistle resisted attempts by Harare THQ to turn Howard Hospital
into a for-profit private hospital, thereby maintaining affordable fees low for
the very poor. He has also spoken out for the welfare of his staff,
guaranteeing sustainable salaries and preventing Harare THQ from demanding arbitrary
payments from HH employees. When he was dismissed, lower level employees’
salaries were cut by over 50%, salaries were late in coming, and employees were
required to contribute to THQ SA meetings at Victoria Falls.
◦
▪
Thistle was accused
of being stubborn, arrogant and unable to get along with people
◦
This certainly
wasn’t the opinion of those who he served and of those with whom he served, nor
of those who gave their money, or time and talents to travel halfway around the
world to volunteer at Howard Hospital. Unfortunately, most of those at THQ
and IHQ had not met or worked with Thistle, and the critique leveled again
Thistle seeking his removal was based solely on the opinion of those wishing to
get rid of him.
◦
▪
Not
communicating with IHQ
◦
All
correspondence with IHQ would go to Commissioner Makina’s desk first, making
this accusation suspect.
◦
▪
Being
"too big for his boots" and "going too far"
◦
True, but not
out of pride. Humbly, he presented the world with the needs of the poor, and
put Howard on a good financial standing.
◦
▪
Using outdated
drugs and thereby endangering the lives of his patients
◦
A research
conducted by the US Food and Drug administrator on behalf of the US military
has shown that no danger existed, and that most drugs are still at ‘labeled
potency’ even years past their expiry date.
◦
◦
Harvard University reported that medical
authorities state expired drugs are safe to administer, even those that expired
years ago. It's true the effectiveness of a drug may decrease over time, but
much of the original potency still remains even a decade subsequent to its
expiration date. There are a few rare exceptions, such as tetracycline,
nitroglycerin, insulin, and liquid antibiotics, but these drugs do not
represent the drugs used by Howard Hospital.
Dr. Thistle said: “I would rather
give an outdated but still potent drug than no drugs at all”.
◦
◦
One of the
containers of drugs bound for Howard was labeled "near expiry date"
(it had been delayed) and did not reach the hospital, having been
"disposed of".
◦
▪
Performing
complex procedures which the Army could not afford to cover in case of a
malpractice suit
◦
This was said
to Dr. Silverman, who became very angry and replied that the Army would not
have to be concerned with malpractice, as Paul was held in the highest regard
by his peers both in Canada and Zimbabwe
Turning the hospital from its original "Primary Care" model to
a surgical specialist unit
◦
This
accusation is false on both counts. From the start, Howard Hospital tried to
provide total care, including dental, surgical, orthopedic, obstetric, and eye
surgery, utilizing the skills of visiting doctors. The first doctor at Howard,
Jock Cook, prided himself in being able to provide total care, including
complex surgery.
◦
Thistle has
been at the forefront of preventive medicine, especially in HIV and TB, with
the collaboration of the highly respected Dr. Silverman and universities in
Canada. This support has mostly come to a halt since he left, including a
mobile educational team with puppeteers that covered schools and beer halls.
◦
▪
Attracting
patients from all over Africa instead of concentrating on his own community
◦
This is true,
and to be commended. These were high-paying patients, the income from which was
used in providing care for the poor in the local communities
◦
.
▪
Thistle is
white, and the hospital ‘should have black African leadership’.
▪
▪
That his
pattern of leadership was neo-colonial.
◦
This is hardly
true, as staff were free to run their own programs and make suggestions on how
to improve hospital health provision services. All black African staff. Now
they are all under tight Harare THQ control with no input requested from the HH
staff.

15 comments:
After reading this, I am ashamed to belong to this organisation. Its despotic leadership style is shocking. I find it unbelievable that they could demand from these extremely poor people, whose salaries they had already cut by 50%, that they give towards THQ meetings at Victoria Falls.
That is shocking. In the far more prosperous West, where many of us just give peanuts to the Lord and to TSA from our incomes, there is no pressure whatsoever on us to forcibly donate. Indeed, I can't remember when I last heard a sermon on stewardship or the practice of tithing.
Is this the African way? I know of a young convert in another part of Africa who has gone through periods of depression because of their THQ's handling of money, demanding more from their poor members, and the perceived corruption by headquarters' staff, where donations either don't arrive, or their transition from one continent to another limps along at a painfully slow timescale. I didn't believe it at the time, but my vision is unfortunately becoming clearer.
Reading about Paul Thistle and his financial endeavours, one can't help but feel he was struggling against a tide that was designed to trap him at some time. What isn't in dispute is that he wanted and did everything he could to improve the health and wellbeing of the people of Chiweshe. Can we say the same for TSA? I think not.
what they have displayed here is a breathtaking arrogance and a callous view of suffering humanity in loving their systems more than people.
If we had been in the good doctor's shoes, what would we have done?
UK
In the words of Osborne ...
My life must be Christ's broken bread; my love His outpoured wine; a cup O' filled, a table spread beeath His name and sign; that other souls refreshed and fed, may share His life, through mine.
Is/was this not Dr Thistle and Mrs Thistle's only indictment?
Former Soldier UKT
So, IHQ and THQ officers and soldiers often pop-in to read the blog articles here. I hope when they do, they feel totally and utterly disgusted and ashamed at the apparent treatment of Dr. Thistle at the hands of The Salvation Army. Even if some of the doctor's actions were worthy of criticism, this is no way for the leadership of an international christian organisation to react. As a (more-or-less) lifelong salvationist, I am shocked and disgusted at what has happened at HH and with Dr. Thistle. More so disappointed at IHQ's handling of the matter. Shame on TSA international leadership! I sincerely hope this scandal is resolved.
I also hope IHQ officers are reading these blogs and posts. If so, please report back the following.
I have seen, among the photos of yesterday, Major Jane Kimberley interviewing the new General. That's good. I hope the interview will be in the next edition of Salvationist and shared with other Army publications around the globe so we can get some idea of the new General's priorities.
But what I'd most like to see in the Salvationist, under his engagements, is an early visit - ?his first as General? - specifically to the Howard Institute!
In my opinion, for what it's worth, Major Kimberley is a safe pair of hands - I don't think she will rock the boat and ask questions about the HH - I'd be surprised if she did. her questions will have been carefully scripted to cause minimal discomfort, if any.
Have you noticed (UK) that there has been nothing in 'Salvationist' about it? They report all the success stories and inane articles about people reaching milestones in service (for positions they volunteered to do in the first place and experienced little hardship in carrying out).
There are very few 'challenging' articles, or articles acknowledging our shortcomings, with a resolve to repent and be restored.
If we don't confess our shortcomings even to each other, where is the way to spiritual growth?
Being participant in these discussions from the beginning in 2012, I still find it shocking to read these allegations especially the two that cast doubt on Dr. Thistle's professional practice - use of old drugs and the lawsuit issues. Also the 50% salary withholding - even in Zimbabwe is that not illegal? The neo-colonial and racist allegations are just beyond - but that's where the political scene comes into this.
Bottom line - Dr. Thistle had his priorities right in saving life and limb but TSA did not have its priorities right.
Well said.
This is so very tragic. For all concerned. But again its Gid's timing for any action. But im sure IHQ is watching and waiting. In that time perhaps the new team at the top will it is hoped act.
UKT FORMER
Re: complex surgeries
What is not mentioned in this blog entry is that in 2004, Dr Thistle delivered conjoined twin boys. Thistle reached out to the Canadian medical community and pled the twins plight. In 2005, the twins, accompanied by a nurse from Howard Hospital (i recall reading her name is Grace), were flown to Canada and were separated in a complex surgery at The Hospital for Sick Kids in Toronto. All expenses were covered, the children recovered well and returned to Zimbabwe.
All this to say that I believe that Dr Thistle knows the limits of his own abilities, and of those who came to volunteer. He wouldn't risk the life of a patient.
Is this not a contradiction of some sorts?
"Dr. Thistle resisted attempts by Harare THQ to turn Howard Hospital into a for-profit private hospital, thereby maintaining affordable fees low for the very poor."
In comparison with:
"Attracting patients from all over Africa instead of concentrating on his own community
◦ This is true, and to be commended. These were high-paying patients, the income from which was used in providing care for the poor in the local communities"
What is the difference?
To Anonymous/contradiction -
I would think that the hospital has a sliding-scale fee structure. I don't know this as a fact but it wouldn't surprise me. I think having a sliding-scale fee would be a good idea.
By having HH go private, they might likely no longer be able to adjust their fee scale, which would shut out the very poor they are there to serve.
I would think, too, if the hospital was privatizing, it would no longer be eligible for the money, material and volunteer help that it receives at a mission hospital.
I would have thought that any time, bed and energy taken up by such affluent, outside people who could afford to go anywhere else would take away from the intended purpose of the bush hospital - to serve the local community with affordable basic health care.
It is interesting to see that HH regime provided private health care? What was the overall percentage?
it is possible that the surgeries performed were of a nature that dr thistle, or perhaps a visiting specialist, was the best surgeon to address them. i didnt see that a large percentage of services provided were being given to wealthy patients.
given that hh was 100km from the the capital city of harare and that the conditions of the roads and the inconvenience of traveling there, i tend to believe the treatment for the wealthy was speciality surgery and not typical day to day services.
On the charge of "Using outdated drugs and thereby endangering the lives of his patients": outdated and near to date drugs have been keeping mission hospitals afloat everywhere for years. When we first went to Howard in 1972 we took with us a crate of such drugs, an official SA consignment for the Hospital. Drug companies used to bombard GPs with samples. Until my wife retired as a GP in 2007 these were regularly harvested by mission agencies. In this country that has changed because the drug companies are allowed to direct market to the public, but I don't know if that is permitted anywhere else except in USA.
Harold Hill
Retired officer, New Zealand
That's nice to know. Dr Thistle wasn't doing anything unusual, then. Another fact in his favour that shows the desperation by TSA to accuse him of doing something dodgy.
UK
Post a Comment