A number of factors
meant that we felt now was the right time to tackle the issue of homosexuality
and the Church.
Firstly,
one of our columnists, Steve Chalke, made the decision to hold a service of
blessing in his church for a gay couple in his congregation. Shortly after
this, David Cameron announced plans to legislate for gay people to be able to
get married.
Significant
as they are, there is a danger that all the evangelical rhetoric around
homosexuality focuses on these two things. We are very keen for that not to
happen, and instead to look at the broader (and arguably more important)
questions – what does the Bible actually say about it? How do we pastorally
care for people who are homosexual, or experiencing same-sex attraction? How can
we talk about these issues without rushing to judge those who think
differently? It is these things that we seek to address in the pages of this
magazine.
As you
will read, Steve Chalke has changed his opinion on the subject. He argues that
permanent, faithful, stable homosexual relationships aren’t sinful, according
to his understanding of the Bible. We have given him space in the magazine to explain how he has reached
this conclusion.
Many of you will not agree with him. Some will criticise us for giving him the
oxygen of publicity, for publishing heresy, or for unhelpfully confusing people
who may be struggling with this issue on a personal level.
There
are two main reasons why we’ve done it. Firstly, Steve has been a contributor
for a long time, as well as a prominent evangelical. He spoke at Spring Harvest
for many years and appeared with Billy Graham at Mission England. We wanted to
let him have his say, rather than for rumour and hearsay to dictate the
conversation.
Secondly,
opening up the issues is what this magazine does. We’re evangelical in
conviction, but our approach has never been to suppress what others think,
whether within or outside of evangelicalism. Steve’s is not the only voice.
Greg Downes, our theologian in residence, unpacks the traditional,
conservative, evangelical stance and I have interviewed others.
There
is a risk that this entire subject, which is much more important than what one
person thinks about it, will be hijacked by people talking about Steve Chalke’s
change of view, or about gay marriage. Let’s give this issue the respect and
sensitivity it deserves, take time in prayer and with the Bible to reflect on
where we stand, and then seek to graciously engage with others.
6 comments:
What a difficult subject to tackle. While I'm not sure what my position is anymore on the issue because of such bold writing and challenging takes on exegesis and hermeneutics, I have to say that Steve Chalk is at least stirring a debate where there's never really been one before.
For years my husband and I have worked in social ministry and have tackled issues of accommodating gays & lesbians and transgendered fit into our residential ministry. As a church, it seemed strange to be forced into being loving and accommodating to them by a secular government - it seemed it should have been the other way around.
I also remember being ashamed of my own colleagues who wanted us to preach from the pulpit in the 90's against the government of our province who was considering legislation that would force companies to extend same sex benefits to committed gay couples.
Then I must say that years later I was heartily ashamed of TSA Western Territory's reversal of it's stand on extending benefits to same sex couples when their white paper was logically laid out and was compassionate. They bowed to the pressure of the conservative evangelical organizations. That was a sad day for us in Canada because it had already been part of our legislation for years at that time and people came up to me and chastised us for it and we lost support of some community members because of it.
While no one wants to live contradicting scripture, we must realize how much we don't understand or interpret correctly. We see through a glass darkly and I believe one day we are going to find out that we were wrong about a lot of things.
Love. That is the end of the story - love God with all your heart, mind, soul, body, strength and love your neighbour as yourself.
And so I ask, "Who is our neighbour?"
And yes, I'll probably be "branded" a "liberal" as a result of this post, but can those of us who are unsure any longer hide that feeling that somehow we've missed something?
I've been on the fence for a while and it's getting uncomfortable in that position.
Thanks for opening the debate.
grace...Kathie
Kathie,
I have read many of your posts before on the Rubicon, and you always speak a word of wisdom!
As a former I always check in at appointment time to see the appointments for you and your husband.
In everything you write, you strike me as an authentic Salvationist. Thanks for your courage.
Former
Canada and Bermuda
Kathie,
It's great to see that this debate is stirring people to think - especially those who are 'sitting on the fence'.
God bless you in your ministry.
Yours in Christ,
Graeme Randall
Former Australian East in London
Hey there I am so grateful I found your weblog, I really found you by accident, while
I was researching on Askjeeve for something else, Nonetheless I am here now and would just like to say kudos
for a marvelous post and a all round entertaining
blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to look over
it all at the moment but I have saved it and also added
in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the fantastic work.
Feel free to visit my blog post :: acne home remedies lemon juice
Thanks Kathie - from me too. I always post anon here because this is so close to my heart, by I too am an Ed and Kathie "watcher":) Mostly because we met many moons ago and your influence then was so profound.
I too was deeply disturbed by the decision in the USA to reverse the decision re benefits but to be honest you are the first person I have heard address it.
Active Canada and Bermuda
All I can say is God Help Us!!
What are we coming to? Do we not believe God's word?
Just recently I was searching what scripture has to say on this subject.To begin with, God made Adam and Eve. If He wanted it otherwise He would have made them Adam and Steve and Eve and Bev.
It clearly says in Leviticus 18:22, "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is abomination, which means it is hateful to God. In the 23rd verse it says not to lie with a beast. Not very often do you hear of anyone doing that so why condone anyone doing what God said not to do in verse 22 anymore than what He said not to do in verse 23? Revelation 21:8 says that the sexually immoral will not inherit the kingdom of God. There is no grey area here, it's either black or white. I don't wonder why our nations are in the mess they are in when we as born again Christians do not take a stand on the things our governments are handing out to us. We are not vocal enough and I believe that we will be held accountable to our God some day.
As for homosexual officers and local officers being allowed to take office in The Salvation Army, NO, NO, NO, and I mean NO!!! We will not prosper. We think we have problems now with declining membership and attendances at our services, many corps will be close if we allowed that to happen. Should we welcome these people to worship with us? Of course. The church is a hospital for sinners and not a museum for saints. The sin they commit is no different than any other sin. We need to be firm, show love, teach them and try to let them see that their behavior is sinful. I am ashamed and disappointed that the Army in the USA approved benefits for same sex couples. They will suffer for that and how can they justify that decision when it is against what God laid out in His word.
I am a FSAO from the Canada and Bermuda Territory.
Post a Comment