Feel free to print out and use w Part One for group discussion
Questions for Discussion:
1. What do you think it was like for a mother to write this article?
2. How do you think her son may have responded upon reading it?
3. What statements or questions in the article caught your attention, and
why?
Reading: Position Statement
Read the Position Statement on Gay and Lesbian Sexuality (see appendix A)
and discuss the following questions:
Questions for Discussion:
1. What phrases in this Statement do you find helpful, or wanting
clarification?
2. What do you think The Salvation Army is seeking to uphold in this
Statement?
3. How do you think the family members in the above story might
respond to this Statement?
Readings from the Scripture: Leviticus 18:22, 20:13; Romans 1:26-27
1 An Anonymous Officer-Mother, “It’s different when it happens to you,”
The Officer 44 (Nov 1993): 506-508.
The Salvation Army’s publication, Study Guide for Salvation Story, offers
helpful guidelines for interpreting Scripture (see pages 9-11). For instance,
the Bible’s purpose is to bring its readers into the story of salvation and its
saving way of life. Thus it is not necessarily an exhaustive or systematic
treatment of topics like homosexuality. Because the Bible is a story with its
own progression of plot, it is dangerous to take one element from it out of
its context. Any part of the story is to be interpreted within the whole of the
story. Thus it is necessary to hear any texts relating to homosexuality in
light of the whole of the biblical story.
Any thorough study of homosexuality would require not only an
examination of biblical texts, but the way they have been interpreted
through the years. This study will limit itself to a focus on those texts that
more clearly refer to the experience of homosexuality, and then consider
what it means to be a Christian community in relation to this issue.
Primary Texts
• Lev 18:22; 20:13
• Rom 1:26-27
Commentary:
A few observations are in place at this point. First, when we consider the
scope of the whole biblical story, it can be noted that very little of the Bible
directly addresses the question of homosexuality. However, when it does,
the Bible is consistent in its disapproval of homosexual acts. This is the case
in both Old and New Testaments.
Other observations however, invite further reflection on the Bible’s view of
homosexuality. For instance, the texts in Leviticus are found within the
section often called the Holiness Code, from chapters 17 to 26. This section
is governed by the phrase, “You shall be holy, for I the LORD your God am
holy” (Lev 19:2). It has been noted that males who engage in homosexual
acts “shall be put to death” (Lev 20:13). This response to homosexual acts is
located, however, in a section that also includes the death of adulterers (Lev
20:10). Apart from any application of these responses in the OT, the way
Jesus responded to a woman taken in adultery (see John 8:1-11), and The
Salvation Army’s position on capital punishment requires us to read these
texts in view of the larger story.
With respect to Paul’s denunciation of homosexual acts in Romans, there is
no ambivalence. They are “unnatural” and “shameless” (Rom 1:26-27). In
their context, such acts are considered part of Paul’s cataloguing of sinful
acts which illustrate the outcome of humanity’s failure to acknowledge God
as Creator. That Paul begins this catalogue with homosexual acts indicates
his awareness that his readers would share the same conviction.
There are however several observations to make here too. First, Paul does
not single out homosexual acts as the ultimate sin. From 1:18 to 3:23 Paul
builds a case for the sinfulness of all of humanity. And the manifestations of
our sinfulness include such behaviours as malice, deceit, gossip and slander
(see 1:28-32). In fact, the point of this section in Romans is to prevent the
passing of judgment and ensure that all of us understand we have fallen
“short of the glory of God” (Rom 3:23). To point the finger at homosexual
acts as somehow worse than the others misses Paul’s argument. It is sinful
behaviour, but part of a larger portrait of sinful acts. What also needs to be
kept in mind is that this catalogue of sinfulness is not the prime reason for
Paul’s letter. His focus is really “the gospel” which is “the power of God for
salvation for everyone who has faith” (Rom 1:16). And the line of argument
moves towards the conviction that “God proves his love for us in that while
we were sinners Christ died for us” (Rom 5:8). Thus while we hear the
strength of Paul’s denunciation against homosexual acts, we also want to
hear the larger context in which they are spoken.
Questions for Discussion:
1. As you read these texts in their context, what are some observations
that you have made?
2. It was noted above that the apostle Paul included homosexual acts as
one illustration of a wider sinfulness. Do you think the church has
tended to consider these acts as more sinful than the others listed by
Paul, and if so, why do you think this is so?
3. What do you make of this issue in light of Paul’s overall argument
about grace and salvation?
The Statement and the Church
In the opening scenario depicted in this study, the mother-officer says of her
gay son, “I am equally sure that Jesus would reach out to him.” Jesus, as we
learn from the NT, often reached out to individuals who were excluded
from the larger community in his day. Lepers, for instance, were excluded
from involvement in the wider community of faith, yet Jesus reached out to
them and embraced them.
One story that suggests itself to this issue is found in Luke 8:40-56. There
are, in fact, two stories that are related by Luke. One involves the open
request of a religious leader; the other involves the anonymous touch of an
“unclean” woman. At that time society placed a strong value on its notion
of religious purity. Individuals considered impure or “unclean” had to
distance themselves from those who were considered pure or holy. Thus
lepers, Samaritans and menstruating women could not go near the
Jerusalem temple so that it would not be defiled by their presence. These
individuals were socially unacceptable, unclean. And in the case of this
woman in Luke 8, her hemorrhaging kept her at a distance for twelve years.
We begin to understand then why she approached Jesus anonymously, not
openly. Her touch of Jesus brings bodily healing. But Jesus seeks a more
open awareness of who touched him. With courage she steps forward and
acknowledges who she is. Jesus recognizes the social cost of her “impurity”
and names her “Daughter.” She, who lived for twelve years apart from the
community of God’s people, was included by the grace of Jesus. In
response he says, “Daughter, your faith has saved you, go in peace” (v 48).
Then Jesus proceeded to follow Jairus, the leader of the synagogue, to his
home. And to bring healing to his twelve year old daughter. A religious
leader’s public plea was answered in the privacy of his home; a woman’s
anonymous touch brought her into a new experience of community.
Questions for Discussion:
1. How might the experience of the individuals in this story be reflected
in the lives of gays and lesbians today?
2. What do you think this story is saying about the nature of Christian
community?
3. What do you think this story is saying about the character of God?
Worship:
These words of Albert Orsborn could be sung or prayed as a response to
this study:
O is not the Christ ‘midst the crowd of today
Whose questioning cries do not cease?
And will he not show to the hearts that would know
The things that belong to their peace?
But how shall they hear if the preacher forbear
Or lack in compassionate zeal?
Or how shall hearts move with the Master’s own love,
Without his anointing and seal?
Except I am moved with compassion,
How dwelleth thy Spirit in me?
In word and in deed
Burning love is my need;
I know I can find this in thee.
[Salvation Army Song Book, # 527]
Mission:
In light of this study, the group could brainstorm and suggest different tasks
it could do to follow up on its conversation. The following are offered as
possibilities for the group:
• Come to know members of the corps who live with this issue
personally, and learn from their story.
• Come to know community groups who take an active role in working
with the gay and lesbian community, and hear their concerns.
Appendix A
Position Statement on Gay and Lesbian Sexuality
The Salvation Army upholds the dignity of all persons. For this reason, and
in obedience to the example of Jesus Christ, whose compassionate love is
all-embracing, The Salvation Army does not discriminate on the basis of
sexual orientation in the delivery of its services.
The Salvation Army believes that God’s will for the expression of sexual
intimacy is revealed in the Bible, and that living fully in accordance with
biblical standards calls for chastity outside of heterosexual marriage and
faithfulness within it. We do not believe that same-sex attraction is
necessarily blameworthy and we oppose the vilification and mistreatment
of gays and lesbians. We believe that we are accountable for the ways in
which we express our sexuality. While recognizing the challenge that this
presents, The Salvation Army believes firmly in the power of God’s grace to
enable all to live in a manner that is pleasing to Him.
In keeping with our mission, we are committed to proclaiming the good
news of salvation, the forgiveness of sins, and transformation by the Holy
Spirit. We welcome all seekers of faith in Christ to explore Salvation Army
church life.
The Salvation Army, Canada & Bermuda, October 2002
Resources
Anonymous. “It’s Different When It Happens to You.” The Officer 44 (Nov
1993): 506-508.
Balch, David L. Homosexuality, Science, and the “Plain Sense” of Scripture.
Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing, 2000.
Grenz, Stanley J. Welcoming but Not Affirming. Louisville: Westminster
John Knox Press, 1998.
Hays, Richard B. The Moral Vision of the New Testament. San Francisco:
Harper Collins Publishers, 1996.
Hurtado, Larry W. “The Bible and Same-Sex Erotic Relations.” Crux 32
(June 1996): 13-19.
Members of the International Doctrine Council. Study Guide to Salvation
Story. London: Salvation Army International Headquarters, 1999.
Volf, Miroslav. Exclusion and Embrace. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1996.
For more information
Please contact:
447 Webb Place
Winnipeg, MB CANADA R3B 2P2
Phone: 204-957-2412 Fax: 204-957-2418
ethics_centre@can.salvationarmy.org
1 comment:
Firstly the positional statement referred to in this story is currently under review (as shown at this link http://www.salvationarmyethics.org/position-statements/gay-and-lesbian-sexuality/ - and the material dates from at least 2007 - there has been a lot of good theological work down on this issues since then, especially in Canada. Same-sex marriage became legal in Canada in 2005- when this material was written it was a very new concept. I wonder if experience with same-sex marriage has changed perceptions.
Secondly- there has been a lot written about the Romans passage quoted- there are several competing and potential valid ways of exegeting this passage- only one of which comes to the conclusion that the author does.
Post a Comment