Thursday, January 16, 2014

Maybe He's Not Gay? Part Two


Linda Harvey's 'Maybe He's Not Gay: Another View on Homosexuality' Book Pulled From Amazon [UPDATE]





Harvey tells Accuracy in Media she asked the publisher to pull her book from Amazon because it “had attracted the usual ‘gay’ mob with ad hominem attacks and even numerous review[er]s that admitted they had not read the book.” She said, “They just wanted to attack the idea of a book for kids, and me personally.”


The Huffington Post | By James Nichols

Notorious anti-gay pundit and Mission America founder Linda Harvey sparked outrage earlier this week she announced the sale of her new book Maybe He's Not Gay: Another View on Homosexuality through Amazon.

Now, after receiving numerous letters expressing shock and criticism, Amazon has yanked Harvey's book from its virtual shelves, Back2Stonewall is reporting.

As Queerty points out, the book's description reportedly challenged parents to consider hard-hitting questions, such as “Does this identity bring the promised liberation and the key to a whole new life? Does it lift the burden of secrecy –- or begin a different kind of struggle?... Is there another possibility that transcends the seeming finality of a homosexual identity?"

Harvey has historically been an extreme anti-gay pundit, claiming that gay-inclusive education is "child abuse" and advocating for the firing gay employees. In addition, she's been called "the most homophobic woman in America."

This isn't the first time Amazon has pulled potentially dangerous books from their website. In October, thousands of "abuse-themed" e-books were removed after a "report highlighted titles depicting rape, incest and bestiality," according to the BBC.

UPDATE: Queerty notes that a spokesperson from Amazon claims, “the publisher removed the book from sale, not Amazon.”

Harvey's response:

Having suffered a major setback when Phil Robertson of “Duck Dynasty” got his job back, the gay lobby is now going for a softer target—a pro-family activist in Ohio whose book, Maybe He’s Not Gay, undercuts their recruitment efforts among kids.

Author Linda Harvey, who runs a pro-family ministry called Mission America, seems to have emerged as more of a target than Phil Robertson.

Robertson was suspended—then reinstated—from the show after making comments critical of homosexuality, some of them based on biology and the facts of life, and others on Bible passages.

The Maybe He’s Not Gay book “seeks to tell kids the truth about homosexual behavior,” Harvey says. It explains in a conversational tone why no one is born homosexual, the health risks associated with the lifestyle, and factors which may lead to same sex attractions.

Harvey asserts that the homosexual movement is revolutionary and designed to overturn traditional cultural values. “It’s a revolution, both inside the minds and hearts of today’s youth—and in our culture,” her book says.

In response, the pro-homosexual Huffington Post attacked the book as “potentially dangerous” because it suggests children don’t have to engage in dangerous homosexual conduct, and that parents can influence how their children turn out. The publication also claimed that Amazon had “pulled” the book in response to homosexual criticism.

But Harvey tells Accuracy in Media she asked the publisher to pull her book from Amazon because it “had attracted the usual ‘gay’ mob with ad hominem attacks and even numerous review[er]s that admitted they had not read the book.” She said, “They just wanted to attack the idea of a book for kids, and me personally.”

She adds, “So once the book has been out for a while, we may put it back up on Amazon and hope to get actual reviews of thoughtful people who have read the book.”

However, in the meantime her book is available on her own website.

Last June, Harvey spoke at a press conference in front of the Washington, D.C. headquarters of the Human Rights Campaign, the leading gay rights lobby, to protest the organization’s inordinate influence on the public policy debate. “Their goal is nothing less than total suppression of all opposing viewpoints,” she said.

Her book argues, “At school, in the media, in books, kids are being urged to consider whether or not they are homosexual at younger and younger ages.”

She says the “You could grow up to be gay” message is being given to children even in elementary school, “creating a lot of emotional upheaval for many” and leading some to come to the false conclusion that they are homosexual.

It’s being done “to satisfy the goals of adults who want to change society through kids,” Harvey says. “Get people to accept homosexuality at a young age, and a small group of people can revolutionize the world. Trouble is, kids aren’t getting the whole story and the facts. In my opinion, they are being set up.”

The “revolutionary” aspect is apparent in that Harry Hay, a member of the Communist Party USA and supporter of the North American Man-Boy Love Association, founded the homosexual movement in the U.S.

“As a mother,” Harvey writes, “I especially want children to gain understanding about critical issues at the right time. To withhold information from young people, or worse, be intentionally deceptive, is a profound betrayal when adults ought to have the best interests of children at heart.”

In terms of those adults, the gay lobby, which is heavily funded by Hollywood and the media, reacted with dismay and outrage to Phil Robertson being reinstated on the “Duck Dynasty” show, which is carried by the A&E cable channel.

The reinstatement occurred because hundreds of thousands—perhaps millions—demanded it. Visitors to one site—www.mailtheduck.com —had a free, personalized, camouflage postcard with the message, “You Can’t Camouflage Anti-Christian Bigotry. Reinstate Phil!” sent to A&E.

Robertson’s company, Duck Commander, a maker of duck calls and other products, declared “Fan Appreciation Month” in response to the outpouring of support.







_________________________



13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Amazon’s listing was pulled following a deluge of complaint letters. LGBT lobby? Politicians? Publisher?

The book contains “advice” for parents with children who have an attraction to the same-sex, and claims to suggest alternatives to accepting the sexuality of a child, including ignoring their requests for support.

Linda Harvey of Mission America in the book poses questions such as: “Is there another possibility that transcends the seeming finality of a homosexual identity?”
….
Last month, Harvey attacked the US Supreme Court for its rulings in two key equal marriage cases, to call the justices “clueless, immoral leadership”.

Joseph Patrick McCormick, Pink News

Anonymous said...

and the comments on Duck Dynasty were also condemned for being racist, not just homophobic.I have read Harvey's book, and many of its ideas are potentially dangerous. Reviewers are entitled to point out discredited ideas, that is part of the role of reviewer. It is simple enough to have deleted reviews where the reviewer admits to not having read the book, or where the review is offensive.

Unknown said...

As a European in general and Swede in particular, I find oppinions like Linda Harvey's quite.... Queer.... Hence I am aware there are Swedes that shares here thoughts, I suspect most of us has embraced new thoughts about those subjects, and many of us are able to do so withholding our Christian faith.

Anonymous said...

Linda Harvey's book, position and argument are harmful.

No wonder so many people think that The Salvation Army is anti-gay, with posts like.

The disclaimer that posts on this site are not an endorsement of any particular position cannot possibly shelter The Salvation Army from negative backlash from blog posts like this.

Too bad someone felt that blogging Linda Harvey was appropriate. Too bad.

Anonymous said...

This article is not by me but may add something to this ongoing reflection

Flat-earthers or just good Christians? Meet the gay converters
http://www.independent.co.uk/

FORMER SALVATION ARMY OFFICERS FELLOWSHIP said...

To; "No wonder so many people think that The Salvation Army is anti-gay, with posts like this. -The disclaimer that posts on this site are not an endorsement of any particular position cannot possibly shelter The Salvation Army from negative backlash from blog posts like this."

The blog IS NOT a SA blog. Nor is it endorsing the book or the author's position. It was posted simply to highlight that the LGBT lobby's voice seeks to silence others. And, exaggerated statements such as; 'No wonder so many people think that The Salvation Army is anti-gay'.

Does your wide swipe apply to all 126 countries where the SA provides spiritual and social services support?

And, what are you and the LGBT doing to correct that misconception? We welcome a response on how you, the LG folk and the FSAOF can team up to effect positive change.

FORMER SALVATION ARMY OFFICERS FELLOWSHIP said...

To; "No wonder so many people think that The Salvation Army is anti-gay, with posts like this. -The disclaimer that posts on this site are not an endorsement of any particular position cannot possibly shelter The Salvation Army from negative backlash from blog posts like this."

The blog IS NOT a SA blog. Nor is it endorsing the book or the author's position. It was posted simply to highlight that the LGBT lobby's voice seeks to silence others. And, exaggerated statements such as; 'No wonder so many people think that The Salvation Army is anti-gay'.

Does your wide swipe apply to all 126 countries where the SA provides spiritual and social services support?

And, what are you and the LGBT doing to correct that misconception? We welcome a response on how you, the LG folk and the FSAOF can team up to effect positive change.

Anonymous said...

FSAOF - you are correct that the LGBT lobby seeks to silence others - it's done a pretty good job so far, and I suspect it will go even further, when free speech will soon be effectively silenced. The old phrase 'sticks and stones will break my bones but words will never hurt me' is regretfully no longer valid in this day and age. But they speak with forked tongue - it's OK for them to call people homophobic if they don't agree with the 'gay lifestyle' viewpoint, but there's no avenue of criticism open for straight people.
They say that being gay is in their DNA, but so is being straight. We all seek to circulate among like-minded people - I fear on this subject never the twain will meet. Yes, there are those who are tolerant of LGBT, and there are straight people who actually embrace it with open arms, but I suspect there is a large 'conservative' number of folk who, like me, find it abhorrent, and want nothing to do with it. And I have no problem reconciling this thought trait with my Christian life or worship, probably much to the disgust of those sympathetic to the cause. I, like gays, believe God made me this way.

Unknown said...

Yes - There are differenties between us who are Christians. And it have been like this since the very start of Church.
But it must be possible - even in debacles such as in the LGBT question - to say , No. I do not agree with you, but we share the faith in Jesus our Savior.

Anonymous said...

Amen sister, AMEN but what about the poor bisexuals or transsexuals who are squeezed somewhere in between?;);)!

Active UKTI

Anonymous said...

The GL movement and their supporters in politics and in corporate boardrooms keep shooting themselves in the foot. Their incessant in-your-face media activities and public display of the dominance of their movement over traditional societal values know no boundaries. And they play on our fear of reprisal.
What would be their response and that of the vote seeking politicians and PC corporations if we decided to hold a traditional values parade? Would they and all those who rally behind their Pride parades exhibit similar support?

FORMER SALVATION ARMY OFFICERS FELLOWSHIP said...

FOR THE RECORD- NO COMMENTS WITH A FOCUS ON THE CURRENT POSTS HAVE BEEN EDITED OR DELETED. HOWEVER, SOME 30-50 SPAM COMMENTS ARE DELETED DAILY!

Anonymous said...

Would a 'traditional values' parade even be allowed? Just as an example, I believe there is a 'black broadcasters' association, but if a 'whites only' broadcasters' association was formed, it would soon be blacklisted (excuse the pun).
Values are skewed today. There is no sense or reason to them. LGBT people make up a minority of the population, yet we are held to ransom because our views differ. I do agree with the comment above - too much in your face attention. Every day we are subjected to it ad nauseum. Too much of anything alienates, not endears.