Sunday, August 4, 2013

The Charges levied against Captain (Dr.) Paul Thistle


The Charges levied against Captain (Dr.) Paul Thistle
▪                Not following strict Salvation Army protocols regarding donation remittance (there is no suggestion that moneys were not properly submitted to the SA)
▪                 
◦                                  Those accusing Thistle were also guilty of sidestepping protocol-SA regulation
◦                                   
▪                Not following CRA (Canada Revenue Agency) protocols regarding donations as it pertained to monies donated by IFHH and other Canadian donor groups
◦                                  Canadian officials were aware of the circumstances and did not voice or register any complaints

Disobeying orders from THQ and IHQ.
◦                                  This charge is not disputed. Dr. Thistle resisted attempts by Harare THQ to turn Howard Hospital into a for-profit private hospital, thereby maintaining affordable fees low for the very poor. He has also spoken out for the welfare of his staff, guaranteeing sustainable salaries and preventing Harare THQ from demanding arbitrary payments from HH employees. When he was dismissed, lower level employees’ salaries were cut by over 50%, salaries were late in coming, and employees were required to contribute to THQ SA meetings at Victoria Falls.
◦                                   
▪                Thistle was accused of being stubborn, arrogant and unable to get along with people
◦                                  This certainly wasn’t the opinion of those who he served and of those with whom he served, nor of those who gave their money, or time and talents to travel halfway around the world to volunteer at Howard Hospital. Unfortunately, most of those at THQ and IHQ had not met or worked with Thistle, and the critique leveled again Thistle seeking his removal was based solely on the opinion of those wishing to get rid of him.
◦                                   
▪                Not communicating with IHQ
◦                                  All correspondence with IHQ would go to Commissioner Makina’s desk first, making this accusation suspect.
◦                                   
▪                Being "too big for his boots" and "going too far"
◦                                  True, but not out of pride. Humbly, he presented the world with the needs of the poor, and put Howard on a good financial standing.
◦                                   
▪                Using outdated drugs and thereby endangering the lives of his patients
◦                                  A research conducted by the US Food and Drug administrator on behalf of the US military has shown that no danger existed, and that most drugs are still at ‘labeled potency’ even years past their expiry date.
◦                                   
◦                                   Harvard University reported that medical authorities state expired drugs are safe to administer, even those that expired years ago. It's true the effectiveness of a drug may decrease over time, but much of the original potency still remains even a decade subsequent to its expiration date. There are a few rare exceptions, such as tetracycline, nitroglycerin, insulin, and liquid antibiotics, but these drugs do not represent the drugs used by Howard Hospital.
Dr. Thistle said: “I would rather give an outdated but still potent drug than no drugs at all”.
◦                                   
◦                                  One of the containers of drugs bound for Howard was labeled "near expiry date" (it had been delayed) and did not reach the hospital, having been  "disposed of".
◦                                   
▪                Performing complex procedures which the Army could not afford to cover in case of a malpractice suit
◦                                  This was said to Dr. Silverman, who became very angry and replied that the Army would not have to be concerned with malpractice, as Paul was held in the highest regard by his peers both in Canada and Zimbabwe

Turning the hospital from its original "Primary Care" model to a surgical specialist unit
◦                                  This accusation is false on both counts. From the start, Howard Hospital tried to provide total care, including dental, surgical, orthopedic, obstetric, and eye surgery, utilizing the skills of visiting doctors. The first doctor at Howard, Jock Cook, prided himself in being able to provide total care, including complex surgery.
◦                                  Thistle has been at the forefront of preventive medicine, especially in HIV and TB, with the collaboration of the highly respected Dr. Silverman and universities in Canada. This support has mostly come to a halt since he left, including a mobile educational team with puppeteers that covered schools and beer halls.
◦                                   
▪                Attracting patients from all over Africa instead of concentrating on his own community
◦                                  This is true, and to be commended. These were high-paying patients, the income from which was used in providing care for the poor in the local communities
◦                                  .
▪                Thistle is white, and the hospital ‘should have black African leadership’.
▪                 
▪                That his pattern of leadership was neo-colonial.
◦                                  This is hardly true, as staff were free to run their own programs and make suggestions on how to improve hospital health provision services. All black African staff. Now they are all under tight Harare THQ control with no input requested from the HH staff.

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

After reading this, I am ashamed to belong to this organisation. Its despotic leadership style is shocking. I find it unbelievable that they could demand from these extremely poor people, whose salaries they had already cut by 50%, that they give towards THQ meetings at Victoria Falls.
That is shocking. In the far more prosperous West, where many of us just give peanuts to the Lord and to TSA from our incomes, there is no pressure whatsoever on us to forcibly donate. Indeed, I can't remember when I last heard a sermon on stewardship or the practice of tithing.
Is this the African way? I know of a young convert in another part of Africa who has gone through periods of depression because of their THQ's handling of money, demanding more from their poor members, and the perceived corruption by headquarters' staff, where donations either don't arrive, or their transition from one continent to another limps along at a painfully slow timescale. I didn't believe it at the time, but my vision is unfortunately becoming clearer.
Reading about Paul Thistle and his financial endeavours, one can't help but feel he was struggling against a tide that was designed to trap him at some time. What isn't in dispute is that he wanted and did everything he could to improve the health and wellbeing of the people of Chiweshe. Can we say the same for TSA? I think not.
what they have displayed here is a breathtaking arrogance and a callous view of suffering humanity in loving their systems more than people.
If we had been in the good doctor's shoes, what would we have done?

UK

Anonymous said...

In the words of Osborne ...

My life must be Christ's broken bread; my love His outpoured wine; a cup O' filled, a table spread beeath His name and sign; that other souls refreshed and fed, may share His life, through mine.

Is/was this not Dr Thistle and Mrs Thistle's only indictment?

Former Soldier UKT



Unknown said...

So, IHQ and THQ officers and soldiers often pop-in to read the blog articles here. I hope when they do, they feel totally and utterly disgusted and ashamed at the apparent treatment of Dr. Thistle at the hands of The Salvation Army. Even if some of the doctor's actions were worthy of criticism, this is no way for the leadership of an international christian organisation to react. As a (more-or-less) lifelong salvationist, I am shocked and disgusted at what has happened at HH and with Dr. Thistle. More so disappointed at IHQ's handling of the matter. Shame on TSA international leadership! I sincerely hope this scandal is resolved.

Anonymous said...

I also hope IHQ officers are reading these blogs and posts. If so, please report back the following.
I have seen, among the photos of yesterday, Major Jane Kimberley interviewing the new General. That's good. I hope the interview will be in the next edition of Salvationist and shared with other Army publications around the globe so we can get some idea of the new General's priorities.
But what I'd most like to see in the Salvationist, under his engagements, is an early visit - ?his first as General? - specifically to the Howard Institute!

Anonymous said...

In my opinion, for what it's worth, Major Kimberley is a safe pair of hands - I don't think she will rock the boat and ask questions about the HH - I'd be surprised if she did. her questions will have been carefully scripted to cause minimal discomfort, if any.
Have you noticed (UK) that there has been nothing in 'Salvationist' about it? They report all the success stories and inane articles about people reaching milestones in service (for positions they volunteered to do in the first place and experienced little hardship in carrying out).
There are very few 'challenging' articles, or articles acknowledging our shortcomings, with a resolve to repent and be restored.
If we don't confess our shortcomings even to each other, where is the way to spiritual growth?

Anonymous said...

Being participant in these discussions from the beginning in 2012, I still find it shocking to read these allegations especially the two that cast doubt on Dr. Thistle's professional practice - use of old drugs and the lawsuit issues. Also the 50% salary withholding - even in Zimbabwe is that not illegal? The neo-colonial and racist allegations are just beyond - but that's where the political scene comes into this.

Bottom line - Dr. Thistle had his priorities right in saving life and limb but TSA did not have its priorities right.

Anonymous said...

Well said.

Anonymous said...

This is so very tragic. For all concerned. But again its Gid's timing for any action. But im sure IHQ is watching and waiting. In that time perhaps the new team at the top will it is hoped act.

UKT FORMER

jolinda cooper said...

Re: complex surgeries

What is not mentioned in this blog entry is that in 2004, Dr Thistle delivered conjoined twin boys. Thistle reached out to the Canadian medical community and pled the twins plight. In 2005, the twins, accompanied by a nurse from Howard Hospital (i recall reading her name is Grace), were flown to Canada and were separated in a complex surgery at The Hospital for Sick Kids in Toronto. All expenses were covered, the children recovered well and returned to Zimbabwe.

All this to say that I believe that Dr Thistle knows the limits of his own abilities, and of those who came to volunteer. He wouldn't risk the life of a patient.

Anonymous said...

Is this not a contradiction of some sorts?


"Dr. Thistle resisted attempts by Harare THQ to turn Howard Hospital into a for-profit private hospital, thereby maintaining affordable fees low for the very poor."

In comparison with:

"Attracting patients from all over Africa instead of concentrating on his own community

◦ This is true, and to be commended. These were high-paying patients, the income from which was used in providing care for the poor in the local communities"

What is the difference?

Anonymous said...

To Anonymous/contradiction -

I would think that the hospital has a sliding-scale fee structure. I don't know this as a fact but it wouldn't surprise me. I think having a sliding-scale fee would be a good idea.

By having HH go private, they might likely no longer be able to adjust their fee scale, which would shut out the very poor they are there to serve.

I would think, too, if the hospital was privatizing, it would no longer be eligible for the money, material and volunteer help that it receives at a mission hospital.

Anonymous said...

I would have thought that any time, bed and energy taken up by such affluent, outside people who could afford to go anywhere else would take away from the intended purpose of the bush hospital - to serve the local community with affordable basic health care.

It is interesting to see that HH regime provided private health care? What was the overall percentage?

Anonymous said...

it is possible that the surgeries performed were of a nature that dr thistle, or perhaps a visiting specialist, was the best surgeon to address them. i didnt see that a large percentage of services provided were being given to wealthy patients.

given that hh was 100km from the the capital city of harare and that the conditions of the roads and the inconvenience of traveling there, i tend to believe the treatment for the wealthy was speciality surgery and not typical day to day services.

Anonymous said...

On the charge of "Using outdated drugs and thereby endangering the lives of his patients": outdated and near to date drugs have been keeping mission hospitals afloat everywhere for years. When we first went to Howard in 1972 we took with us a crate of such drugs, an official SA consignment for the Hospital. Drug companies used to bombard GPs with samples. Until my wife retired as a GP in 2007 these were regularly harvested by mission agencies. In this country that has changed because the drug companies are allowed to direct market to the public, but I don't know if that is permitted anywhere else except in USA.
Harold Hill
Retired officer, New Zealand

Anonymous said...

That's nice to know. Dr Thistle wasn't doing anything unusual, then. Another fact in his favour that shows the desperation by TSA to accuse him of doing something dodgy.

UK