Tuesday, March 12, 2013

We've Been Content for Too Long! (TAKE-OVER BID)



I read with appreciation Major Stephen Court’s recent post enumerating some changes he would like to see in the Army this year, and it prompted me to jot down some of my thoughts on that subject. I write from the perspective of someone raised in The Army, saved in the Army, commissioned as an officer, and who--after twelve years of ministry--resigned my commission at the Lord's leading. Now, it seems impossible that I have served God for nearly twice as long SINCE officership as I did AS an officer. But such is the case.

Nonetheless, I retain a deep and active love for the Army. I treasure not only the memory of my years in its fellowship but also enduring friendships with so many in its ranks. I return as often as possible to that fellowship, and support it with my prayers and my gifts. I dedicated my book, Quit Going to Church, to The Salvation Army, in acknowledgment of the debt I owe to it, and I proudly boast of the Army's ministry and promote it to everyone I can. So it is in that context I offer the following, three things I'd like to see change in the years ahead:

1. Its modernization

The Salvation Army (in the English-speaking world that constitutes my experience, at least) is a marvelously preserved expression of life, faith, and witness in Victorian England. Of course, we no longer live in Victorian England, but things that made perfect sense in that milieu are often defined and defended as marks of "Salvationism" today. Uniforms. Brass bands. Perhaps even its military structure, terminology, and management style. I'm not suggesting that these expressions have no utility at all in many places, but that their utility is nowhere near as widespread as it once was, and that many in the movement have turned these means into ends. 


As a result, the means (brass banding, etc.) have survived while the ends ("go for souls!") have suffered. I know I am certain to be misunderstood on this point; it won't be the first time. 

For example, I love the uniform, and hope it will always have a witness, but serious and courageous thought must be given to when and where it is no longer useful. 

I love the Army's musical heritage, and I know there are more and more contemporary uses of the great storehouse of talent still alive in the Army world; however, with a few exceptions, a brass band is not nearly the practical and adaptable worship resource it was in the Army's early years. I could go on. Unfortunately, as with all worthy traditions, greathearts who are in the best position to initiate such discussions are most attached to the traditions. 

Though some "Good Old Army" ways may be outdated, they meant much to many who owe the most to the Army, which makes change unlikely...and all the more urgent, as more and more souls who could be touched by new means are left by the wayside. 

2. Its approach to personnel matters

In my experience, The Salvation Army has the best human resources in the world--big-hearted, hard-working, self-sacrificing, God-loving men and women. And it seems to me that great strides have been made in recent years in giving attention to pastoral care of officers, improving communication up and down the chain of command, etc. But it also seems safe to say that the Army AND its personnel suffer greatly from the lack of a cohesive Human Resources philosophy and approach. This may be due to differing challenges from one territory to another, and frequent changes from one administration to another. I get that. But both as an officer and a former officer, I have often shaken my head at policies and actions that seem likely--even, at times, designed--to lose good people, alienate them, and keep former officers from being returned to the ranks. It is not only a coherent, cohesive philosophy and policy that must be developed, but also a culture that must change. Army leadership must lead the way in reversing the stigma and suspicion that is sometimes directed at former officers. 


Active steps must be taken to retain the service of good officers, and strategies for sensitive cultivation of former officers--as soldiers, employees, or officers--must be adopted. 

3. Its adoption of multi-site thinking

The "multi-site" phenomenon has been around for awhile now in many churches--in which a single church worships in multiple locations. For example, Crossroads Community Church in Cincinnati, located in the central Cincinnati community of Oakley, has in the last few years opened "campuses" in a northern suburb and a southern suburb (across the river in Kentucky). 

Each campus has a campus pastor and various staff and volunteers, but many of the church's functions are combined with other campuses (the weekly sermon, for instance, is recorded or simulcast for playing on large video screens in the other two locations). Some "multi-site" churches simulcast worship music sets while featuring live preaching on site. This approach saves much duplication of effort from one site to another, and allows campuses of relatively meager means to benefit from the resources of other campuses. I have long thought there is no better place for this model to thrive than in the Army. Various corps in a region or division could link with other corps and share resources electronically on Sundays, such as a thriving music ministry or a gifted graphic artist. Divisional leaders could designate strategic corps to receive certain advantages—financial or otherwise—in order to resource other corps. Corps officers could rotate preaching and some of the labor-intensive work of getting a fresh, meaningful worship experience off the ground every week. A divisional or territorial leader who visits a corps could enlarge his or her ministry by “remotely” visiting the other “corps campuses” in that area. 

The already-rich Army fellowship would be enriched even more as people in one location share parts of a worship experience with their fellow soldiers in other locations. And that is just the beginning of the benefits.

I realize, of course, that big changes like these could be painful to many, and would certainly invite disagreement and opposition. But I also believe that the Army has some of the greatest minds in the Church—minds that are capable of bringing about such things--and that progress in these areas would reap a rich and abundant harvest for generations to come. 


BOB HOSTETLER


Bob Hostetler is an award-winning writer, editor, pastor and speaker from southwestern Ohio. His thirty books, which include The Bone Box andAmerican Idols (The Worship of the American Dream), have sold millions of copies. He has co-authored eleven books with Josh McDowell, including the best-selling Right from Wrong (What You Need to Know to Help Youth Make Right Choices) and the award-winning Don't Check Your Brains at the DoorHe has won two Gold Medallion Awards, four Ohio Associated Press awards, and an Amy Foundation Award, among others. Bob is a frequent speaker at churches, conferences, and retreats. 
Bob was ordained to the ministry in 1980 by The Salvation Army. He and his wife, the lovely Robin, served in The Salvation Army from 1980-1992. 
In 2000, Bob (with his wife) helped to co-found Cobblestone Community Church in Oxford, Ohio. He has served that church in leadership and teaching pastor roles. 
Contact Bob via email.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Maybe I am a bit too much of the traditionalist of which you speak, but I must disagree with the contention that the brass band has outlived its usefulness. While I agree that styles change and we must adapt accordingly, I also feel that this can be accomplished without "throwing out the baby with the bathwater". As you, I was born into the Army, saved in the Army, commissioned in the Army and so on. Following 20 years of service, I have now been out for 9. However, I am currently working at an extremely multi-cultural corps where we are using brass banding as a very effective outreach and development tool for the youth of our corps. My wife and I are the only "white folks" in a corps that is half Haitian with the other half from a wide variety of Central/South American Hispanic countries. Yet, brass banding is flourishing here. We have doubled the size of our senior band in a year and we have a large number of youth coming up through junior band and beginner programs. Quite a number of these youth are brand new to the Army and we are using this tool to connect with them and them to the corps. Is it the be-all and end-all? Of course not! But it is one tool that still can be used successfully if applied intelligently.

Steve Hull
Former - USA Central

Hoss said...

Thanks for the comment, Steve, I'm glad to hear it. And I agree wholeheartedly with all you say. As I said, expressions such as brass bands can still be useful (and ARE) in many places...and I'd love to see the Army capitalize on those places (for example, in making a Montclair NJ, with its fine band and songster groups, a catalyst for other "campuses," as I talk about in my third point.

However, a look at the culture in which most corps minister, unlike Victorian (and even to some extent contemporary England) brass music isn't the musical language (so to speak) of the public. Even in my years as a bandsman and corps officer, I listened to other genres of music at home, in the car, etc. (except Sunday mornings on the way to the corps when I forced my wife and kids to listen with me to brass music!). So I think we're on the same page. I don't want to disparage places where old forms are thriving, but I do take issue with preserving the forms as "Salvationism" when other tactics would bear greater fruit.

Anonymous said...

We don't use brass band exclusively, but as part of a larger plan. We also have a contemporary Praise Team in which many of these same kids participate. We are this very week holding our own local "Spring Break Music Camp" encompassing brass banding, guitar, piano and drum instruction (with the help of our DHQ music dept staff) as well as a day devoted to worship dance. I am certainly open to utilizing other expressions - I guess I just get my back up when people say brass bands are passe. Look at how many community brass bands are springing up all over the place outside of the Army - that's my point.

Steve Hull
Former - USA Central

BTW - Are you related to Larry? He was in our session in Chicago. We sang in a quartet together.

Hoss said...

Yup. Larry's my MUCH older brother.

Anonymous said...

First of all, in relation to Brass bands (as this is hot on people's minds), I have to say that comments about music style are a cop-out. From my experience, music style has no relationship to effective evangelism etc. It's how you use whatever music you have. There does need to be a mix, but more importantly, you need to use what you have well - that is the key. I look at a lot of the music that came out of Stoneleigh, and realise how traditional and non-contemporary it really is in it's musicality, yet what an impact it has around the world. Just about all of the P&W material that comes from any source is about as foreign to modern contemporary music as brass bands are (from a musicality perspective) - yet we seem to think that P&W bands and music is being contemporary. Are we really that out of touch with the modern world that we call that stuff contemporary? It's nothing more than a cop-out to excuse other deficiencies. Just look at some of the high church congregations that are absolutely thriving - and their style makes TSA style look futuristic. It's how you use what you have. The same things can be said of all the 'modernisation' aspects of our 'Victorian' style.

Regarding personnel matters.
To a point I agree. However, I think we can get a little myopic and not realise what might just be going on under the table. There are a lot of people - many very, VERY, senior leaders who are trying to radically change things around. However, there are also a number of 'old guard' Officers who are scarred stiff about some of the changes that look like might be coming, and so they are using tactics like vetting emails, vetoing appointments, carefully selecting who is either selected for training or who is re-accepted into Officership etc. etc. etc. I think there is quite a power struggle going on in the upper echelons. Both sides think they are right. I think we need to be patient, and supportive of some of the Officers who we think are not doing the right thing in this regard, but may themselves be frustrated by others who are 'managing' them by running interference and controlling the flow of information.

Multi-site thinking.
interesting.... I think the one and only obstacle here is that there are those who would perceive that as 'merging' Corps, closing Corps, and shrinking. It is a wrong perspective, but that is how people view this. In reality, this is what the current militaristic structure was originally working. Our obsession with Stats, and being seen to be growing faster than we were brought us to where we are today. No one wants to be the person that cleans the roles and removes all the PTG soldiers from the active soldiers list etc. NO one wants to be the one that is accused of effectively closing Corps (which is what it will be seen as) - but it needs to happen.

Just my thoughts.

Yours in Christ,
Graeme Randall
Former Australian East in London

Nic Elder said...

Why do Salvos always go straight for the band. I agree Graeme, that is a cop out. I have just spent the weekend at a community BRASS banding weekend in the park and we had four bands and a great crowd, not to mention a sold out concert on the Saturday night. Officers treating soldiers and other officers in an unChristian way, a lack of integrity and too much wanting to be like all the other churches, that's why we are going down the gurgler.

Anonymous said...

“I am deeply convinced that the Christian leader of the future is called to be completely irrelevant and to stand in this world with nothing to offer but his or her own vulnerable self.” ... (apart from Christ that is)
Henri Nouwen

I wonder how comfortably that will sit with us.

Anonymous said...

I think when the five year reviews come up they weed the ranks. Also if you have an independant mind they don't want you.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for your insightful and courageous blog post Bob. I resonate with much of what you have said. I also hear the reactions and comments of responders. There lies the challenge! In spite of the General wanting us to be 'One Army', at the individual level we are many different 'armies'. Each person has their own life experiences and cultural shaping that determine our individual forward vision. The amazing thing is that God will still choose to use these differences so long as 'Christ is lifted up!' I personally play in a Brass band at an ultra tradional corps every Sunday morning. It is the worshipping community where my children were introduced to faith. Every Sunday night I enjoy singing/playing in an innovative contemporary worship band in a neighbouring growing new plant corps where the average age is 30 years younger. Both are authentic expressions of Salvation Army in 2013. I believe that we will achieve more unity and discover our shared identity (Linda Bond's 'One Army') only as we celebrate our diversity - and passionately support each other in every expression of Salvationism to be a 'holy people' a 'sanctified army', called for God's purposes.
David Parker
Aust Southern
(Son / Father of Officers)