The great Renaissance man Sir Francis Bacon held a caustic opinion of ‘old’ people “who object too much, consult too long, adventure too little and repent too soon.”
Wonder what he meant and who he was thinking about when he said that? I also wonder why he said it, did he have someone in mind? What was the catalyst for making him say it? So many questions could be asked about why he said it and there is so much to take from it. Over recent months ‘Old Age’ has been a concept that has taken me by surprise as a personal field of study. Everyone always things of themselves as being eternally twenty something and so there is an element even at thirty something of feeling old. I once asked my daughter when she was about eight about her new teacher and her only response was that she was really old. How surprised was I when I met her and found that she was about my age. I had a work colleague at one time who was going to retire and someone said of him “he is due to retire’. My response was that he was due to retire soon after he left University with his degree in Theology, or whatever it was.
You see ‘old age’ is a moveable feast that depends on so much more than just a linear timeline, as there are so many more factors to take into account. In this blog I have read of and know Officers who have felt hard done by because they were almost forced to retire and been very resentful about it and if you have your ear to the ground you will know of officers who in response to the question ‘How are you doing?’ ..will respond with how many years, months and days they have to go to retirement.
The real question that we should ask however is not what Francis Bacon was thinking about when he made that statement, but how we respond to it. I would dare say that how old you are would have something to do with your response. Now I am not talking about how many years you have been alive or even how many years you served, how many years since you became a former but how old are you in your thinking, in your head, the very core of your being and if you want to stretch it out even further, how old are you in your Soul?
I often wish that this was all as simple as it sounds but I believe that there is an antidote to aging. You can find with a very quick search on Google for ‘Antidote to Aging’ 246,000 entries all in .2 of a second (isn’t that amazing) but I would hazard a guess that the vast majority of them are all about our actual physical being, which some of us are concerned about but was not what Francis Bacon was talking about. Now I could spend a great deal of time talking about not allowing our mind to grow old and it revolves around things like listening to your internal wisdom, living in the present, giving up the need for approval, knowing that how you see the world ‘out there’ simply reflects your reality ‘in here’, shedding the burden of judgement, getting and giving forgiveness. If you are a centred person you will know all this stuff, however there is one quality that I have seen transform people dramatically and that is the ability to be flexible.
I did go to an outdoor ballet presentation once, under sufferance I might add, and because I had to be there early to reserve good seats I was able to see some of the dancers doing their exercises prior to the presentation. I was amazed and impressed at how they had trained their bodies to be flexible; I am sure this comes at a cost but it was amazing to see the end result. I believe that we also need to learn flexibility to ward of the old age that Francis Bacon talked about. It is comparatively easy to lock ourselves into continuing to believe and act how we did when we were seven. It’s a significant age and if you remember where you were in your spiritual journey at seven it is really easy to remain there. We have read and discussed at length on this Blog about ‘the Truth and nothing but the Truth’ and the question is where did we learn that truth and is it a truth for seven year olds or are we supposed to grow and mature and have an adult understanding of our Faith. It was Bishop John Shelby Spong who was one of the most recent teachers who championed the idea of not parking you intelligence at the front door when you go to worship. For me; I have a need to understand and rationalise what scripture is saying, but far more importantly I need to know what lessons it teaches and what it means for me. I have love of the Old Testament but if I take it literally I could sell my daughter into slavery (Exodus) with impunity and yet the church and others fought long and hard to ban slavery that is now a heinous activity. We could drag this out for pages and pages but all I want to do is highlight that to avoid Francis Bacon’s opinion of old people may not one day be applied to me because I am locked in to a theology that is archaic, stagnant and irrelevant.
Flexibility for me means that I will bend with the harsh winds of life and become old and wise, as opposed to being just old. The commencement of my former status did not mark the end of my calling, but in learning to be flexible (not a spiritual gift but vital necessary quality) I can continue to grow and develop into whatever the future may hold. I know more than anyone else that I am not there yet but I am taking time to think about my faith and it is far more significant now than when I sat in the Sunday School at my home Corps.
Tell me who you think Francis Bacon was talking about........
11 comments:
Hi Fletch,
Thanks very much for your thought provoking post.
I would agree that as we grow older, it is very important to be flexible ... to grow and mature in our understanding of the faith ... to not park our intelligence at the front door when we go to worship ... to not only grow old, but wise and old.
But for me this has not meant leaving behind what I previously learnt, and viewing it as an archaic, stagnant and irrelevant theology, but building on it, refining my understanding of it, and going deeper and wider into it.
When I was seven, my knowledge of planet Earth was very limited and basic. Over the intervening years, my knowledge has greatly grown in comparison (though there is so much more to know and understand). Likewise, when I became a Christian, my knowledge of the Scriptures and its theology was very basic and limited. But just as the Earth has not changed and remains the source of my understanding of the planet, likewise the Scriptures. They are still the unchanging, fully trustworthy, truthful and reliable source of all my knowledge about God, his works, ways and will, in which I hopefully will continue to grow.
Thanks again.
Regards.
Bernard Martin
Former UKT
I am so glad that we are under a new covenant and do not have to live under Old Testament Law. Yes the Biblical principles can be applied but I would not want to be stoned to death or banished for certain sin. I rather go to Jesus for forgiveness and have true repentance.
USA East former
Hi Fletch,
No surprise - but I loved your article. Agreed with it 100%!!!!
Bernard.... To take you analogy of the world.... The world does continually change over time. We constantly learn new things about the world that completely revolutionise our understanding of the world and turn previous notions on their head and throw them out the window. Over time, new species arise, old ones become extinct, inhabitants of the world (including humans) change and morph. This has happened even in recorded history - as late as the last 100years or so. The world is in constant flux and our understanding constantly changes. If it doesn't, then it is right for us to be called 'luddites' and 'idiots', etc. etc. etc.
Like Fletch, I think the same cann be said of faith and scripture. As an experiment, try living your life the way people did only a couple hundread years ago - adopting the same beliefs, morals, social codes etc. See how at odds you are with reality and how far you get. Faith is exactly the same. Throughout history, what people have believed has been more or less right for that period in history and that period in history only.
We do need to change constantly and be flexible. It was Paul who said "9For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10but when perfection comes, the imperfect disappears. 11When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put childish ways behind me. 12Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known." (1 Cor. 13:9-12). We need to change - otherwise we look like children throwing a temper-tantrum saying 'I don't want to change!!!'
Just a few thoughts,
Graeme Randall
Former Australian East
Always enjoy your musings, and always a new twist on something old. A true renaissance man!
Former
UKT
Hi Graeme,
Thanks for your response. Every illustration has its limitations, and you've pointed out some of the weaknesses of my particular comparison.
However, I would still maintain that the basic composition and principles of existence and operation of our planet, remain constant (my illustration was thinking more of the geology of the planet, my particular area of knowledge growth) ... whereas it is our understanding of them which grows as we discover more and more.
However, whether the illustration is more or less applicable, I would still maintain that the Lord has given us his unchanging truth in the Scriptures ... for example, Jesus came to bear witness to the truth (John 18v37), and that truth is now available to us in the Scriptures ... our part is to certainly grow in our understanding of it, but not depart from its fundamentals (see Paul again in 1 Co 15v1-11, or Jude v3,4).
To grow in understanding, I agree we need to be willing to be flexible and change, as these aspects are essential to growth (as Paul implies in 1 Co 13) and no doubt some things we thought we knew, we subsequently discover we have misunderstood. But the fuller knowledge towards which we are to grow is vitally linked to the foundational knowledge with which we start, and from which we should not depart.
Regards.
Bernard (Martin)
Former UKT
Has this changed ? Jesus Christ, the same yesterday,today, and forever. What is unchanging ?
What is reliable ? Can I depend upon God in my old age or should I look to someone or something else ? Who can I trust ? What part of the Bible is more important for me to follow ? In this age should we practice the new age religion or practices of the day ? After all we learn these new things and we have great progress.How flexible should we all be? Mix up Christianity with Islam ? Compromise so much that we feel guilty and cheap ? Where and what is the "Canon" or "rule" or "standard" that we should receive information about God and how He wants us to live ? I am not pointing to a church body or people but Scripture. Interpretation, culture , language , inspiration , Bibliolatry , Pauline writings , faith , these words and many more are often twisted and misused to put down anyone that trusts the Word of God and takes a firm stand, and teaches righteous living through the power of the Holy Spirit. No, let us have itching ears and pick and choose and argue that the Bible was written in a time that has "nothing" to do with today.I also hear opinions of morals and faith and that our spiritual lives are not really connected.As long as you have "faith", your actions and morals have nothing to do with your relationship with Christ.Is that true?
The Bible does not change. Christ does not change. The Biblical principles do not change. People change. New thought and new ideas come into view.Some from the very pit of hell.
Former USA
"The Bible does not change. Christ does not change. The Biblical principles do not change. People change. New thought and new ideas come into view.Some from the very pit of hell."
Wow. What changes is realization. You know, we aren't always right in our interpretation. In fact, we've been darn wrong many times and for way too long. And some of us continue to be stubborn whether for correct or incorrect reasons.
Stubborn can be good. So can persistence. They are very similar.New ideas and new thought can, and often does bring good change and perhaps more productivity. But in this point I would say change in operation and more user friendly type of tactics.Forward thinking can be good. Adjusting for the culture and a weeding out of old outdated policy or practice-good. Modern day Salvation Army leadership should adjust to Biblical standards and what was once meant to happen. How about female officers being treated with respect and receiving more responsibility? How about compensating them properly ? That is how something went wrong. There is an example of being stubborn.
USA East former
Yes, it is true that Jesus is the same yesterday, today, and forever etc. The fundamentals I'm sure do not change. BUT!!!!! as I have argued ad-nauseum in the past, we can not know those fundamentals entirely. Anyone who claims they do, I would denounce as a heretic - and say they are putting themselves above God by claiming to understand the mind of God. The Bible says what it says because it was written in a language and a way for certain people to understand - people who had limited intelligence etc. Making the Bible the be-all and end-all of theology is like making a pre-school reading book that says 'look at Tom jump puddles' the be-all and end-all of high literature. It is highly offensive and insulting - both to God the creator, and us, God's creation.
Yours,
Graeme Randall
Former Australian East
Hi Graeme,
I would agree with you when you say that we cannot know the fundamentals 'entirely', but I would maintain the we can 'truly' know those aspects of the fundamentals that God has revealed in the Bible ... and it is in these truths that we are to keep on growing in our understanding.
I would also maintain that the Bible was not written just for those who first received its various writings. Paul tells us in 2 Tim3v16,17, that all Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching etc, that the man of God may be equipped for every good work.
If you, or I, or anyone wants to be equipped to live for the Lord, then it is essential that we listen to and obey his Word which he has breathed out as the Scriptures.
I'm sorry that you find this approach to the Bible offensive and insulting, but my perspective is that the Bible claims to be the Word of God, and so is totally trustworthy in all it teaches (properly interpreted), for all people, for all time.
Regards.
Bernard (Martin)
Former UKT
Some people do find the Bible offensive. They are fearful of it. They disagree with it.Attempt to demean it or make it less important than what it is or was meant to be. I think that there are accountability issues at stake with some that run it down or rarely praise and acknowledge the power that is revealed in it and that it points to The Living Word, who never sinned.
I am with you on this one , Bernard. I do not mean that is sounds good or is compared to poetry or self help books either. My opinion as well as many others is that it is inspired and should be used to teach, train , rebuke , build up people in the church. Specific verses to specific people have not lost their meaning and can be applied to todays believer in Jesus. Maturity and using the mind that God gave to us all, would dictate to not stone a woman found in adultery in this day and age. We live in a New Covenent.God will deal with the sin and bring judgement. We may lovingly warn an individual but it is ultimately up to The Holy Spirit to deal with people. Of course there is church discipline but that is a whole new subject.
Blessings,
USA Eastern territory
Post a Comment