Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Top Ten TSA Decisions of the Decade?

There was a time, many moons ago, when I thought that I might have a chance at making a difference in some of the areas where I felt we were lacking in the Army. As a very new Officer (by months) I met with a few fellow ‘newbie’s’ and we would of course put the Army right. Most of you know what that is and over the years I have seen this as a ‘sacred’ part of our culture and believe that it is one of the areas where officers can begin to make changes in some of the areas that need to improve. After one of these ‘newbie’ sessions where we all agreed that something needed to be done and so being young, possibly arrogant, ignorant and full of my own importance, I drafted a letter to the Commissioner, and in no uncertain terms laid out what my, or I should say ‘our’, concerns were. Posted it off and waited. I did get a one line note back saying that my concerns ‘had been noted’, and nothing else ever eventuated. However I was surprised that when I told my fellow newbie officers at our next meeting and told than what I had done; their biggest concern was ‘You didn’t mention our names did you?” Such is life.

I also remember at an Officer’s fellowship once where we were playing cards and talking about our Corps locals and it degenerated into a very holy realignment of our various Corps Locals. “I will ‘bet’ one miserable Bandmaster in exchange for two good Home Leaguers” said I, “and I will raise you one mean and incompetent Corps Treasurer for a Songster Leader who is sympathetic to the message;” etc, etc, you get the drift, and I am in no doubt that our local corps soldiers do the same thing about the officers that had been dropped on them from a great height. It still happens and last week I was asked if an officer going to a new Corps had any skeletons in their closet. This was from a soldier at a Corps where I was CO for two years and without doubt it was two of the worst years of my life. (Read; ‘People of the Lie’ by M. Scott Peck)

Over the years I have learned a few things, but still feel that I have so much to learn that I now feel that there is not enough time left, you know the old heads on young shoulders syndrome; however one of the things that I have learned is that when I became a ‘former’ all those things that I hoped to change when, and if, I was promoted to a place where I could have possibly made a difference, had to be left to others who might feel the same and continue working for improvement. It is one of the most painful feelings leaving things undone in any area of life.

I read with interest Commissioner Joe’s list of the ‘Top Ten Decisions of the Decade’ as far as the Salvation Army is concerned; or should we add in his view. I was greatly troubled from what I read and it was nothing to do with the actual decisions as he states they are “(Good or bad, right or wrong, will depend upon the reader’s perspective). Except for #4, I remain noncommittal, at least until the (my) next book is written.” However there does seem to be a hint of negativity from just putting together this list, and circulating it in this forum. It is human nature that in a group with very dramatic hurts and possible ongoing trauma from the way people have been treated by individuals in positions of power within the Army that it might have a resonance that will confirm very negative emotions in many people. I want to ask the question ‘What difference is this going to make to the future of the Army?’ If we believe that the Army was raised up by God and he continues to call people to follow him through it, then it surely is fair to assume that there are still people left in Authority in our great movement who feel the same and that they will pick up the ‘fight’ to rectify what we perceive as wrong. I would probably agree with Commissioner Joe about all the issues that he raises and be just as angry and crying out for justice as well, but not being part of the establishment any more as a ‘former’ (or retired), then if I were to raise these issues it could possibly be seen as a version of ‘Sour Grapes’ on my part.

I have recently been in contact with a CEO of a Not for Profit organisation whose mantra is ‘I am not here to develop your strengths but to improve your weaknesses’, when all current management theory is about developing strengths and managing the weaknesses. In the church over many years I have observed that we are such a caring group of people’ we are all about improving weaknesses wherever we find them and this by definition often puts us in the position of ignoring our strengths.

I was recently at the 80th birthday celebrations for General Eva Burrows, who was my Commissioner for a few years, and among the things that struck me as significant was that there were so many positives that emerged from her life and ministry.I was again struck by what I had missed out on as a ‘former’ and while that is so very painful, I believe that it is a far better feeling than spending available energy on replaying the negative like a cracked record that just will not stop.

I have counselled and coached many people who have been damaged by the Army and other organisations, let us not think that we are unique in the way that people have been dealt with by a minority of our leaders, and I personally recognise the pain of what could have been if..... However I want to move on and concentrate on what are our strengths, be they as an Army or as individuals like our formers who are doing great things despite how they have been dealt with. I continue to recognise the sacred responsibility that we all have of ‘putting the Army right’ but let’s not leave at just that. I believe that we have a responsibility to now focus on the positives so that the future will be bright for the Army; and for us as individuals.

Tell me what you think; am I alone in feeling this way?

Fletch
Peter Fletcher
Former
Australia

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

When I left the 'Army, I felt as though TSA is no longer 'God's tool'. It may have been raised up by God, but is no longer under God's direction or Lordship, and is no longer sustained by God. I believed that noone is 'called by God' into Officership anymore - it is just emotional hype, and those that believe they are called by God, and being used by God, are simply delusional. To an extent, I still believe that.

After reading the reports of Sven about the work in Latvia, and the work in Port-Au-Prince, I think to myself 'Are there 2 Armies - one that is used by God, and one that has nothing to do with God? I wonder, given the experiences I have had and many others have had in The 'Army, is TSA heading for a split - the 2 'Armies splitting so that the one that is used by God can continue to be used by God, and the one that isn't, cut away like deadwood.

I want to 'move on' as Fletch suggests, my mother is still an active officer. But everytime I try, and look at the 'Army now, I still see the same evil and hurt, and it re-opens all the old wounds. I think the best I can do is interact with it from a distance - through this forum for example.

Just my thoughts.

Graeme Randall
Former Australian East.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

More interesting reflection; thanks Fletch ! Great illustration used in connection with the card game ! I'm still chuckling- 3 minutes later.

Your blog is now my first choice for SA news and I commend you on consistently striving toward a transparent respect for TSA ethos. There is respectful debate on contemporary issues that we actives are afraid to bring to the table. Your articles are informative, insightful and inspiring... would love to see THE OFFICER publish some of them in order that the wider officer audience be enlightened. I've told many friends about the site.

One wonders what's discussed in your private FB site?!

Keep up the good work, and I for one hope that active officers be invited to join your mission to Latvia project.

Active CO, UKT

Anonymous said...

I too feel that part of the Army is going in one direction and another part of it is going in another direction. I actually feel that some are caught up in politics and advancement and covering their back and others are more interested in their individual calling. That "calling", Graeme is what God wants us to do in our lives. It may be through the Army or other avenues. We must remember that the Army is made up of individuals and some will be on "fire" and others may have different goals and motives. As former officers, we are in different circumstances that cause us all to have many different opinions and feelings. We all need to talk to God about it. I struggle also.

Fletch, I agree that we do have to move on. I know that to dwell on certain issues and being negative would cause more harm to me. The Army can be a great help to many so if I do not like it, I should move on. I believe God raised up the Army. I believe that God raised up the many ministries that have glorified Him including that of John Wesley and others. I believe that more will be. Thank you for your insight and the sharing of your experiences and thoughts!

As individuals we need to seek God's will for our own lives. When I stand before God I will have to account for what I have done in uniform and out of it. No organization will stand with me when I enter eternity. I must stand on the mercy and grace of God and my relationship with the Lord , Jesus Christ.

I appreciate Joe Noland and his writings. I deeply appreciated his leadership and the advancement that took place in the Army some time ago.

Blessings to all!

USA East-Former

'Fletch' said...

Dear Graeme and friends

‘Called by God’ is such a misused word and I have to agree that when someone says that they are called by God there is all the baggage around the Kid in the Temple’ who heard ‘God speaking’, and yes those that do ‘hear’ God speaking can sometimes be a little delusional. I have never heard God speak; I went to College originally because I was dating a hot chick who was a candidate, and I thought that it would get me more points in the relationship. Then she went to college with some other guy and I was left with a letter that said “Dear Candidate. We are happy to welcome you to the next session...” What was I to do? Well I did not feel that I could back out and my wise CO, counselled me and in that session which was 41 years ago this month, Told me some words of William Booth when this question was raised about the call, and he directed people to look at the need around them the poor the broken hearted and broken spirited, the distressed and traumatised, those with no purpose in life, those who are “tired and weary” of life. He outlined this great need in the people around him and apparently said “The Need is the Call”.
Yes I went o the college after being in lust so to speak but I saw the need and over my officership I felt that in some of the people I had responsibility for I did indeed answer the call but it was not the audible voice in the temple or the burning bush on the nature strip, nor was it the blinding light that struck me down going up the steps of 68 Victoria Parade, Melbourne, but the call for me was all the people who needed me to represent God to them however imperfect a representative I was.
I agree; when people say they heard God ‘speaking to them’, when the say God has told me that my Gift is such and such and I need to be sent to this appointment, my well developed cynical side tends to say they are talking to themselves and it is their own voice that they are hearing. I still believe that God raised up the Army and he is still calling people to follow him and that need is still being seen, and met, in Latvia and Haiti and Melbourne and New York, and possibly just around the corner from where you are.
It is real easy to can the terminology of did God speak or was it my response to a need I saw, or was it that I am just looking to find some significance out of these few years that I have been allotted on this little planet. The hard part is just going out there and representing God to the community of ‘needy’ people out there. Not all of them are dressed in rags and sleep in the streets but there are many of them who sit in Army meetings and are dressed immaculately as they sing and play the songs of our faith and some of those needy people, dare I say it are dressed in their finery of their rank with their long service ribbons and Silver Stars, Silver braid on the velvet... Am I wrong?
The need is always there and always will be. Whether we are formers, or actives, which in itself needs fleshing out at some point, it is pointless waiting to ‘hear’ from God. You will see the need and in some magical, possibly Harry Potterish way, provide you with all that you need to meet that need.
Graeme, (and others) I wish that we could all sit down and have a coffee so that in an informal manner we could all sit down in Starbucks with all our defences down and just talk with each other; and guess what we will possibly ‘hear God speak to us with each others voice’
If you are ever in Melbourne I would love a coffee with you.
Blessing on you all

Anonymous said...

Fletch,

You make some very good points in your comments.I would agree with you in many ways. It would be fantastic to have a table with a few former officers or others to discuss and have a face to face. Coffee or tea would be a must. It is difficult to get a full understanding of someone and their opinion when you cannot hear the tone and emphasis in the voice.

I like your comment about a "call". That term can be very misused and misleading. I can also understand Graeme's feelings too. I have had to have a few meetings with the Lord on that one. Emotion and true needs in the world draw us to feel "called". People can "serve" in many capacities. I have been a pastor in two different denominations. Was I called to serve in both of them? Sometimes the "calling" is over emphasized. Some may have been deceived or misuderstood the type of call that they perceived. I enjoy cars but I am not going to be an auto salesman as my vocation.A few centuries ago a group of Christians believed that where ever they were gifted and effective, that is where God called them. Once again the talents and gifts are matched with a "calling" or an avenue of service.

For my life and "what gets me through it all", is that I am called to serve the Lord.Regardless of where or how. Of course that goes with " What ever you do ,do it as unto the Lord ". The Army is unique and I feel in some ways is a sleeping giant.What I need to remember is that we can serve in many ways.

Sven, I am so pleased with your sensitivity to the work that you are doing. I know that you feel a sense of joy in the service that you do in the Name of Christ. You seem to be very active and the Lord is using you where you are.
I believe deep down that is what we all seek.

USA Eastern Territory, former officer

Cheryl Hagedorn said...

I'd like to think that we are so focused on serving that we haven't time for sniping whether we're in or out. And I don't mean serving in terms of doing something that is mandated by HQ - I mean serving that flows from our personal relationship with God. I could do with a set of blinders that keeps my eyes on Jesus alone :-)

Anonymous said...

Oswald Chambers' view on the subject of calling was, “… we are called to God and we choose a service.” To explore and define one's calling fully, begins with a complete surrender to God, the Holy Spirit, and then step by step, day by day, building on that experience until His love controls all that we are...

Former
USA East

Anonymous said...

Yes, by all means, look at the strengths of TSA - or of an individual. Yet weaknesses (or might we call it sin in the camp) avoided or ignored tend to get worse over time, and I'm afraid that we're seeing the fruit of that in certain areas. A healthy group, whether a family, church, business or organization, has a process or forum for addressing those components that are keeping it from growing or draining it of its resources. I see Joe's list as one way of doing that in an organization that has little opportunity for input into those decisions.
JoAnn
Active, USA East

'Fletch' said...

JoAnn

You make a good point and it is always important to address weaknesses in the camp, however I personally would be very reticent about broadly calling it sin.

I would agree about a healthy group having the process to address these weaknesses and that is why in another post I called the activity of "Putting the Army Right" as a sacred responsibility that we all have but I think that it needs to be in context

In a forum where there is a great deal of hurt and pain and even trauma over negative issues with the Army, my personal view is that this is not that Forum, and it has the ability to impede ones progress to 'move on'. It has already been mentioned in this string about this need; and a list of decisions that clearly puts the Army in a very bad light does nothing to assist people to heal from their pain.

I would have been one of the fiercest advocates of change within the Army and I believe that William Booth would have been proud of my efforts, but I believe that he would not have been so proud if I did it in a forum with no power to change it, it I becomes "a resounding gong or a clashing cymbal".

As a former (or retired, or ex, or whatever)I cannot expect the Army, to respond or even take seriously a discussion of this nature. On the other hand should a group of us with a well thought out argument approach the 'administration' and engage them, then call me naive if you like, I believe that would get a better response than a ganging up on them through this type of forum.

Any administration in any organisation, sacred or secular will not engage with a group of people who are consistently criticizing them. I value this forum where we can share our pain and what has happened to us, as did Tom Gabrielsen a few days ago and begin to put it into the context of what is the next holy adventure for us. Leave those who just want to criticize to other forums with people who are like minded.

I firmly believe that the vast majority of formers simply want to be heard, not grab a banner and march the cyber world with their pain and trauma on display to blame someone else.

Yes lets put the 'Army right', but lets also do it in the context of the place we formers hold and encourage all those actives who read these pages that if they feel strongly about something then take it up with their DC, or their TC, or some forum that can make a note of their concerns. If every active did this I would believe that 'change' would come, even the dramatic change that Commissioner Joe dreams about. We have not got that mandate but I believe that we do have a mandate to simply love and support each other in our continuing journey into the next exciting adventure that is planned for us.