a forum for intelligent and respectful commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
Monday, June 29, 2015
They have no standard of right and wrong - and do not speak for the masses!
Archbishop Fulton Sheen:
“The millions of the world who keep
their fingers on the pulse of public opinion and follow every theory, every
vogue, every panacea, every popular immorality, and who approve the appointment
of every anti-moral educator, have no standard of right and wrong.
A thing cannot measure itself: A
tape measure must be outside the cloth; a speedometer must not be a brick in
the roadway; a judge must not be a shareholder in the corporation whose cause
he judges.
In like manner the judgment of the
world must be from outside the world. Such
a standard is the need of the hour — an authority that does not, like some
politician, find out what the people want and then give it to them, but which
gives them what is true and good whether it is popular or not.
We need someone to be healthy when
the world is sick; someone to be a stretcher-bearer when the battlefields are
freighted with wounded; someone to be calm when the house is burning; someone
to be right when the world is wrong, as on Easter when they who slew the Foe
lost the day.”
“Although
the policy arguments for extending marriage to same-sex couples may be
compelling, the legal arguments for requiring such an extension are not. The
fundamental right to marry does not include a right to make a State change its
definition of marriage. And a State’s decision to maintain the meaning of
marriage that has persisted in every culture throughout human history can
hardly be called irrational.”
CHIEF
JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS
“Whether
same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us. Under the
Constitution, judges have power to say what the law is, not what it should be.”
CHIEF
JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS
“The
Constitution itself says nothing about marriage, and the Framers thereby
entrusted the States with “[t]he whole subject of the domestic relations of
husband and wife.”
CHIEF
JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS
Marriage was defined by God. No man can redefine it. We will
defend our religious liberties
Greg Abbott
Official
statement on the Supreme Court’s ruling. It reads as follows:
“The Supreme Court has abandoned its role as an impartial
judicial arbiter and has become an unelected nine-member legislature. Five
justices on the Supreme Court have imposed on the entire country their personal
views on an issue that the Constitution and the Court’s previous decisions
reserve to the people of the States.
Despite the Supreme Court’s rulings, Texans’ fundamental right
to religious liberty remains protected. No Texan is required by the Supreme
Court’s decision to act contrary to his or her religious beliefs regarding
marriage.
The Texas Constitution guarantees that ‘[n]o human authority
ought, in any case whatsoever, to control or interfere with the rights of
conscience in matters of religion.’ The FirstAmendment of the U.S. Constitution
guarantees the free exercise of religion; and the Texas Religious Freedom
Restoration Act, combined with the newly enacted Pastor Protection Act, provide
robust legal protections to Texans whose faith commands them to adhere to the
traditional understanding of marriage.
…. I will be issuing a directive to state agencies instructing
them to prioritize the protection of Texans’ religious liberties.”
Sunday, June 28, 2015
When I Look into Your Holiness
![]() |
Moira Wilson - Recording Session |
More solos sung by Moira will follow in the weeks ahead-
Saturday, June 27, 2015
Preamble
The
issue of homosexuality is prompting increasingly intense debate in virtually
all sectors of our society. It’s a debate that is being held in the halls of
government, as legislators try to define what marriage is, and what rights and
protections should be given to homosexual citizens. It’s a debate that is being
held in public school systems, as teachers and administrators make
determinations about hiring practices and what should be taught to children
about homosexuality. It’s a debate that is being held in corporate boardrooms,
as executives decide about extending health care benefits to gay partners. It’s
a debate that is being held in more of our homes, as increasing numbers of
friends and family members and neighbors admit their involvement in same-sex
relationships and we try to discern how to respond. And it’s a debate that is
being held in many denominations and churches-some of them nearing the point of
splitting apart-over the question of whether homosexuality should be affirmed
in the church and practicing homosexuals should be ordained into Christian
ministry. Our culture is deeply divided on many levels about the homosexuality
question, with one end of the spectrum populated by gay activists who hold parades
and demand unqualified acceptance of all homosexual activities. At the other
end of the spectrum are the people who attend those parades and wave banners
that boldly proclaim “God hates gays.” On both sides, feelings are intense,
passions are strong, and ugliness and hatred often emerge.
Where does The Wesleyan Church stand on this challenging and complex contemporary issue?*
Is homosexuality activity a legitimate alternative lifestyle that we as Wesleyans can embrace? Or is it a sin that distorts God’s purposes and is prohibited by His Word? What should be our response to this issue in our contemporary context?
Scriptural
Basis
It
is the historic and sustained conviction of The Wesleyan Church that homosexual
activity is contrary to the known will of God as revealed to us in the Bible.
While numerous biblical passages can be cited to support this view, we believe
the strongest biblical argument against homosexual activity comes from the
account of creation (Genesis 1-2). When Jesus was asked His opinion about
divorce, He took His listeners back to the beginning and used the creation as a
means for teaching them God’s purposes (Matthew 19:4-6). God’s intentions could
be discerned from the way God created things. In a similar way, we believe that
the biblical account of creation is highly instructive as we sort through the
complexities of the homosexual debate. From that account, we learn the
following key truths about human sexuality:
We
learn that we are created male and female, and that male and female together
reflect the image of God (Genesis 1:27).
We learn that it is through the relationship between a man and a woman that human beings can be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 1:28).
We learn that man and woman were created for one another, and that it is God’s intention that a man and a woman become one flesh.
God’s plan for us is revealed in our design, and the book of Genesis shows unmistakably that God has designed our bodies for heterosexual relationships. Even an elementary school understanding of basic biology affirms this view. God’s majestic creation of human beings in His own image, male and female, shows us that homosexual activity is a use of our bodies that rejects God’s original intention and design.
From
Genesis onward, the Bible affirms this understanding. Whenever the Bible talks
about God’s plan for marriage and sexual fulfillment, it is always and only
within the context of a heterosexual marriage (e.g., Mark 10:1-12, Ephesians
5:21-33). Whenever Jesus spoke of marriage, He spoke of a man and a woman. The
entire book of the Song of Solomon is a tribute to the beauty of heterosexual
love. And several passages explicitly mention homosexual activity as among
those behaviors that perverts God’s plan (1 Corinthians 6:9, Romans 1:26-27,
Genesis 19). The Wesleyan Church acknowledges that there are Christians who
come to a different conclusion, but it seems to us that the overwhelming
preponderance of biblical evidence points to the fact that God’s plan is one
man and one woman for one lifetime. We take this stand not because we are
homophobic or intolerant or narrow-minded, but because we are committed to
following the teachings of the Bible about marriage and family and human
sexuality, even when those teachings run counter to prevailing cultural norms.
Some will object to this position based on their claim that people seem to be born with their sexual orientation. The objection amounts to a different kind of appeal to the created order: “If God made homosexuals the way they are, how can it be wrong?” Some Christians respond to this objection by simply asserting that the homosexual orientation is not a genetic or biological predisposition, but rather a personal choice. The Wesleyan Church believes that the causes of homosexuality are likely not as simple as either of those explanations. The truth is that we do not yet have final answers on the causes of homosexuality, and that there are probably different causes for different people, and that often the cause is a combination of factors.
However, the uncertainty and complexity surrounding the root causes of homosexuality do not in any way undermine or compromise our position that homosexual behavior is outside the will of God. Not all inborn traits are good ones. Not all behavior patterns we learn from our families or childhood trauma are desirable. Just as alcohol abuse or rage or any number of destructive behavior patterns might stem from a variety of causes and yet we still hold people to a biblical standard of behavior, we do the same with the issue of homosexuality. We humbly acknowledge the uncertainty around its causes, yet we unashamedly insist that by the grace of God we are still called and empowered to live in compliance with God’s will and purposes as revealed in Scripture.
The Statement
This
leads to an important distinction that we call on all Wesleyans to understand
and remember in their thinking about this topic. The sin of homosexuality is
about the behavior;1 it is not about the orientation or the desire or the
temptation. We are all tempted in many ways-some of us to greed or pride or
envy or self-righteousness. Jesus himself was tempted! And the temptation
itself is not sin; sin comes only when a person yields to that temptation and
engages in the sinful behavior or attitude (1 Corinthians 10:13, James
1:13-15). The same is true of homosexuality. The temptation or desire (or
“orientation”) to find sexual fulfillment with members of the same sex is not
sin any more than any other temptation is sin; homosexuality becomes sin only
when that desire is acted on through homosexual lust or behavior. We certainly
believe as Wesleyans that people with a homosexual orientation can be healed of
that orientation and become heterosexuals, yet we also believe that those who
are not freed of the orientation can be obedient to Christ by abstaining from
homosexual practices and living in sexual purity.
As
The Wesleyan Church seeks to respond to the homosexual issue and (more
importantly) to homosexual individuals, we look to Jesus as our example. Just
as He responded to the woman caught in the act of adultery with these words: “.
. . then neither do I condemn you, go now and leave your life of sin” (John
8:11), so we call on Wesleyans to respond to the homosexual community with both
boundless compassion and a call to biblical standards of sexual morality. We do
not, cannot, and will not endorse homosexual activity as a lifestyle; just as
we cannot, do not, and will not endorse all other kinds of behaviors that
displease God. But we also do not, cannot, and will not endorse condemning,
hate-filled, self-righteous attitudes toward those in the gay community. This
type of attitude, all too common among evangelical Christians, serves only to
drive people farther away from the God who loves them and the community where
they can find Him. Jesus was known as a “friend of sinners” (Luke 7:34), and so
we invite Wesleyans to reflect His heart to all persons who are far from God,
including those in the gay community. We will not compromise biblical truth and
we will not endorse homosexual activity, but we encourage our churches to be
the kinds of communities where a homosexual person can feel wanted and loved
and valued and where they can be introduced to the love of Christ and nurtured
in Him. We require our churches to hold unashamedly to the biblical teaching
against homosexual behavior, but we also ask our churches to provide generously
the sort of teaching, support, ministry, counseling, and hospitality that can
be used by God to bring His redemptive love to those who need it most. The
Wesleyan Church is populated by sinners who have acknowledged their need of God
and are being transformed and renewed by Him; we reach out and welcome anyone
who is seeking that same transforming grace to be at work in their lives as well.
____________________
THE WESLEYAN CHURCH: Response to 2015 Supreme Court ruling
Response
to 2015 Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage
A Wesleyan View of Homosexuality
Preamble
The issue of homosexuality is prompting increasingly intense debate in virtually all sectors of our society. It’s a debate that is being held in the halls of government, as legislators try to define what marriage is, and what rights and protections should be given to homosexual citizens. It’s a debate that is being held in public school systems, as teachers and administrators make determinations about hiring practices and what should be taught to children about homosexuality. It’s a debate that is being held in corporate boardrooms, as executives decide about extending health care benefits to gay partners. It’s a debate that is being held in more of our homes, as increasing numbers of friends and family members and neighbors admit their involvement in same-sex relationships and we try to discern how to respond. And it’s a debate that is being held in many denominations and churches-some of them nearing the point of splitting apart-over the question of whether homosexuality should be affirmed in the church and practicing homosexuals should be ordained into Christian ministry. Our culture is deeply divided on many levels about the homosexuality question, with one end of the spectrum populated by gay activists who hold parades and demand unqualified acceptance of all homosexual activities. At the other end of the spectrum are the people who attend those parades and wave banners that boldly proclaim “God hates gays.” On both sides, feelings are intense, passions are strong, and ugliness and hatred often emerge.
Where does The Wesleyan Church stand on this challenging and complex contemporary issue?* Is homosexuality activity a legitimate alternative lifestyle that we as Wesleyans can embrace? Or is it a sin that distorts God’s purposes and is prohibited by His Word? What should be our response to this issue in our contemporary context?
Scriptural Basis
It is the historic and sustained conviction of The Wesleyan Church that homosexual activity is contrary to the known will of God as revealed to us in the Bible. While numerous biblical passages can be cited to support this view, we believe the strongest biblical argument against homosexual activity comes from the account of creation (Genesis 1-2). When Jesus was asked His opinion about divorce, He took His listeners back to the beginning and used the creation as a means for teaching them God’s purposes (Matthew 19:4-6). God’s intentions could be discerned from the way God created things. In a similar way, we believe that the biblical account of creation is highly instructive as we sort through the complexities of the homosexual debate. From that account, we learn the following key truths about human sexuality:
We learn that we are created male and female, and that male and female together reflect the image of God (Genesis 1:27).
We learn that it is through the relationship between a man and a woman that human beings can be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 1:28).
We learn that man and woman were created for one another, and that it is God’s intention that a man and a woman become one flesh.
God’s plan for us is revealed in our design, and the book of Genesis shows unmistakably that God has designed our bodies for heterosexual relationships. Even an elementary school understanding of basic biology affirms this view. God’s majestic creation of human beings in His own image, male and female, shows us that homosexual activity is a use of our bodies that rejects God’s original intention and design.
From Genesis onward, the Bible affirms this understanding. Whenever the Bible talks about God’s plan for marriage and sexual fulfillment, it is always and only within the context of a heterosexual marriage (e.g., Mark 10:1-12, Ephesians 5:21-33). Whenever Jesus spoke of marriage, He spoke of a man and a woman. The entire book of the Song of Solomon is a tribute to the beauty of heterosexual love. And several passages explicitly mention homosexual activity as among those behaviors that perverts God’s plan (1 Corinthians 6:9, Romans 1:26-27, Genesis 19). The Wesleyan Church acknowledges that there are Christians who come to a different conclusion, but it seems to us that the overwhelming preponderance of biblical evidence points to the fact that God’s plan is one man and one woman for one lifetime. We take this stand not because we are homophobic or intolerant or narrow-minded, but because we are committed to following the teachings of the Bible about marriage and family and human sexuality, even when those teachings run counter to prevailing cultural norms.
Some will object to this position based on their claim that people seem to be born with their sexual orientation. The objection amounts to a different kind of appeal to the created order: “If God made homosexuals the way they are, how can it be wrong?” Some Christians respond to this objection by simply asserting that the homosexual orientation is not a genetic or biological predisposition, but rather a personal choice. The Wesleyan Church believes that the causes of homosexuality are likely not as simple as either of those explanations. The truth is that we do not yet have final answers on the causes of homosexuality, and that there are probably different causes for different people, and that often the cause is a combination of factors.
However, the uncertainty and complexity surrounding the root causes of homosexuality do not in any way undermine or compromise our position that homosexual behavior is outside the will of God. Not all inborn traits are good ones. Not all behavior patterns we learn from our families or childhood trauma are desirable. Just as alcohol abuse or rage or any number of destructive behavior patterns might stem from a variety of causes and yet we still hold people to a biblical standard of behavior, we do the same with the issue of homosexuality. We humbly acknowledge the uncertainty around its causes, yet we unashamedly insist that by the grace of God we are still called and empowered to live in compliance with God’s will and purposes as revealed in Scripture.
The Statement
This leads to an important distinction that we call on all Wesleyans to understand and remember in their thinking about this topic. The sin of homosexuality is about the behavior;1 it is not about the orientation or the desire or the temptation. We are all tempted in many ways-some of us to greed or pride or envy or self-righteousness. Jesus himself was tempted! And the temptation itself is not sin; sin comes only when a person yields to that temptation and engages in the sinful behavior or attitude (1 Corinthians 10:13, James 1:13-15). The same is true of homosexuality. The temptation or desire (or “orientation”) to find sexual fulfillment with members of the same sex is not sin any more than any other temptation is sin; homosexuality becomes sin only when that desire is acted on through homosexual lust or behavior. We certainly believe as Wesleyans that people with a homosexual orientation can be healed of that orientation and become heterosexuals, yet we also believe that those who are not freed of the orientation can be obedient to Christ by abstaining from homosexual practices and living in sexual purity.
As The Wesleyan Church seeks to respond to the homosexual issue and (more importantly) to homosexual individuals, we look to Jesus as our example. Just as He responded to the woman caught in the act of adultery with these words: “. . . then neither do I condemn you, go now and leave your life of sin” (John 8:11), so we call on Wesleyans to respond to the homosexual community with both boundless compassion and a call to biblical standards of sexual morality. We do not, cannot, and will not endorse homosexual activity as a lifestyle; just as we cannot, do not, and will not endorse all other kinds of behaviors that displease God. But we also do not, cannot, and will not endorse condemning, hate-filled, self-righteous attitudes toward those in the gay community. This type of attitude, all too common among evangelical Christians, serves only to drive people farther away from the God who loves them and the community where they can find Him. Jesus was known as a “friend of sinners” (Luke 7:34), and so we invite Wesleyans to reflect His heart to all persons who are far from God, including those in the gay community. We will not compromise biblical truth and we will not endorse homosexual activity, but we encourage our churches to be the kinds of communities where a homosexual person can feel wanted and loved and valued and where they can be introduced to the love of Christ and nurtured in Him. We require our churches to hold unashamedly to the biblical teaching against homosexual behavior, but we also ask our churches to provide generously the sort of teaching, support, ministry, counseling, and hospitality that can be used by God to bring His redemptive love to those who need it most. The Wesleyan Church is populated by sinners who have acknowledged their need of God and are being transformed and renewed by Him; we reach out and welcome anyone who is seeking that same transforming grace to be at work in their lives as well.
____________________
1 “Sexual relationships outside of marriage and sexual relationships between persons of the same sex are immoral and sinful. The depth of the sinfulness of homosexual practice is recognized, and yet we believe the grace of God sufficient to overcome both the practice of such activity and the perversion leading to its practice.” (Discipline 410:5. Emphasis added.)
*************************
The US Supreme Court has issued a ruling in the same-sex marriage cases that are grouped as "Obergefell v. Hodges." The central issue, whether every state must allow same-sex couples to be legally married, has been answered in the affirmative.
The
Wesleyan Church has long held and continues to believe that marriage is an institution
created by God and must be between one man and one woman. As recently as 2004,
the General Conference voted unanimously by ballot vote, affirming the Church's
position that marriage is between one man and one woman. Other, even more
recent affirming actions have been taken.
The
United States and western culture have been undergoing a seismic shift in their
perception of same-sex marriage in recent years. The church must be keenly
aware of the cultural context for ministry and be willing to change, adapt, and
stay relevant in matters of non-essentials. However, it must never sacrifice or
compromise clear biblical truth. The church will always be a prophetic,
counter-cultural voice offering Jesus Christ and his way of life and hope in
exchange for the ways of the world.
The
Wesleyan Church, out of love for others, works to see God's word and his way
more broadly understood and accepted in the world. We believe that God's way is
better for anyone and will result in greater peace, love, joy, and hope in this
life and in the life to come. However, we do not seek to have our view imposed
on others, but merely be able to practice our faith with consistency and
provide service to society in a way that reflects our deeply held beliefs. In
the United States, the first amendment of the Constitution gives protection to
religions and their adherents as they teach their beliefs, such as the
conviction that same-sex marriage is not to be condoned. Even the majority
opinion in the Supreme Court ruling specifically affirms those rights and those
protections.
In
the wake of the ruling, we continue to urge public officials and courts to
uphold public justice and respect religious exercise and conscience for
individuals or organizations who find themselves in conflict with legal
requirements.
The
church is compelled by the love of Christ to care about all people. When we
function and minister, peaceably, in the context of our religious convictions
that we believe are healthy, true, and according to God's plan, it is not just
for ourselves. It is out of caring for everyone, including generations not yet
born. When our stance becomes less popular in a society that is, in some ways,
moving farther from God, love does not let us withdraw. It is out of love
toward those who may think us enemies that we stand for what we genuinely
believe is best for all.
BCM Thought Matters Seminar - Caring about the State of the Nation - 23 ...
Uploaded
on Jun 23, 2015
The
following presentation was given at Booth College of Mission in New Zealand on
23rd April 2015 as part of our "Thought Matters" Seminars. These
seminars are a monthly gathering for theological reflection and discussion
hosted by Booth College of Mission.
The
Social Policy and Parliamentary Unit (SPPU) works toward the eradication of
poverty by encouraging policies and practices that strengthen the social
framework of New Zealand. The Unit provides social research and policy
analysis, engaging with national opinion makers in politics, government,
business, media and education.
Major Sue Hay is the current Director of SPPU,
a unique role offering many challenges and opportunities to represent the voice
of the people The Salvation Army exists for.
She
will offer a personal reflection on the biblical mandate to care about the
state of the nation, with a special emphasis on ‘what the data from the latest
report really tells us.’
A copy of the latest ‘State of the Nation’ can be
downloaded at: http://www.salvationarmy.org.nz/resea...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)