FSAOF CommentaryTariro – An ongoing story of hope
Part three
Hope for today (Continued)
As stated in the article, the Howard Hospital,
like any other mission hospital located in a country where there is political
instability and in-fighting, daunting financial issues and crushing poverty, is
not exempt from the problems in the community surrounding it, nor is it immune
from internal issues with its parent organization.
On one hand, the author of the article praises
the Howard by stating that it is running well and treating patients as usual,
and continues with the praise by stating it has a fine reputation and good
facilities, practice and staff.
Then, the article moves into a discussion of the
surgical practices, past and present, at Howard. It is at this point, one must
stop and consider what is really being said and not said in this portion.
It is understood that the whys and wherefores
were not appropriate for this article, it is an egregious lack of respect to
not name (then Captain) Dr. Paul Thistle as the CMO of the Howard until August
2012. Dr. Thistle gave 17 years of service to the people of Chiweshe AND the
Salvation Army at Howard Hospital. Regardless of the reason(s) why he no longer
serves at Howard, he is due the respect and recognition that is lacking in this
article. It is unconscionable to leave his name out.
Furthermore, the article states that “historically
it (Howard Hospital) has not always had a trained surgeon on site”. This
statement could not be further from the truth. In the early 1960's it had
visiting government surgeons, doctors Rittey, Wolffe, and MacIntosh. In 1965,
Dr. Jock Cook was its first resident surgeon, followed in 1970 by Major (Dr.)
James Watt (R) with a residency in surgery. In 1972, Major Watt was joined by
Dr. Pat Hill, a full-time obstetrician with surgery experience. There was an
18-month break without resident doctors during the worst of the war (1978/79),
but even then, Major Watt performed surgery on days he visited the hospital.
Several surgeons followed, with Dr. Thistle arriving in 1995. August 2012
to the present is the only other time without a formally-trained surgeon
capable of conducting advanced surgery.
It is difficult to understand why having a
surgeon at a hospital should be considered an aberration, excellence be frowned
on and mediocrity praised. Surgical services pay for themselves; primary
care does not.
Again, one can see the continuation of
egregiously neglecting to acknowledge the service provided by these talented
and dedicated doctors. What is to be gained by willfully ignoring the
contribution of these surgeons? The only conclusion that can be reached is that
it is a purposeful attempt to downplay the work that has been done at the
Howard Hospital over the last 50 years. This paves the way to moving the Howard
into the Salvation Army’s new model of medical missions, where primary health
care will be its main focus. The Army is moving away from hospital-based care.
The doctors listed in the report as having
provided surgical capacity for the Howard after Dr. Thistle’s departure are
only capable of performing limited types of surgeries, including caesarean
sections. It should be noted that the two doctors on staff had received
additional surgical training under Dr. Thistle.
The Provincial Medical Director (PMD) is quoted
as saying that the decline in patients was due to misinformation and a
misconception on the part of the locals as to the presence, or lack thereof, of
a doctor at Howard. The local residents have strongly contradicted this
statement.
According to reports from them, they stopped
coming initially as a protest of The Salvation Army. There is another, albeit
small, government hospital nearby (the Rosa Clinic) with a visiting doctor who
provides most of the same types of care as Howard Hospital. Additionally, the
locals indicated that they initially avoided the Howard because of the presence
of the Zimbabwe secret police, as requested by the then-Territorial Commander,
Commissioner Vinece Chigariro, to stifle any further protests over Dr. Thistle’s
dismissal.
Now, over a year after Dr. Thistle’s departure,
the locals avoid the Howard because it refers patients to the big hospitals in
town, which they cannot afford. Instead, they do their best to get to Karanda
Hospital.
To further quote the PMD “… it is now the same
as the other district hospitals in terms of referral.” The Tariro article acts
as if this is a commendable condition. What is not stated here is that other
district hospitals, and even the large government hospitals, used to refer
patients to Howard Hospital because of the excellent surgical skills available
during the tenures of previous surgeons. But now, the Howard Hospital has
declined in its offerings and is only on par, at best, with the very
governmental hospitals the locals avoid whenever possible.
… to be continued
Jolinda Cooper
10 comments:
You've heard of Money Laundering – now hear of Information Laundering.
"The process of concealing information related to wrong-doing. The methods by which information can be laundered are varied and range in sophistication."
How is Information Laundering done?
By using lies, misinformation and other forms of deception and by the use of secrecy and various methods to cover-up wrongdoing.
Lies of Commission
1. Outright lying about a fact or facts
2. Editing and changing existing information to hide wrongdoing in order to create a different impression.
3. Saying information has been released (when it has not).
4. Destroying information (deleting electronic forms of data or otherwise destroying information).
5. Making information more difficult to find (and so make it easier to get away with claiming it does not exist) - eg by storing the data under topics or categories that are not obvious, or by using code words to hide the data or by using difficult to access archival methods
6. Presenting data in such a way that the relevant facts are partly or totally withheld; but different information intended to create a more favorable impression than the actual facts is released.
7. Presenting misleading information (eg financial data or other claims) to influence the way the public thinks and to prevent the public from acting to prevent the deceivers actions from happening.
Lies of Omission
1. Denying the existence of information that actually does exist.
2. Withholding information that should be released.
3. Misclassifying as secret - information that should be publicly accessible under the Official Information Act.
4. Censoring data so that only data the deceptive party wants released is released.
Tragically, this bears more than a passing resemblance to SA statements etc regarding the Howard Hospital and its associated events over the last year.
Very true. IHQ is guilty of pretty much all of the above. The frustrating thing is nothing can be done.
This story takes place in 3 countries - Zimbabwe, England and Canada - Countries with differing laws. If one considers the possibility of a legal case for wrongful dismissal, against whom and where could a legal case be launched, since the Thistle's were dismissed in 24 hours form the HH in Zimbawe, this decision was supported by IHQ in England, and their officership was terminated in Canada?
I suppose ultimately IHQ could be held responsible, but it appears to me that the situation does not easily lend itself to any legal prosecution on any aspects.
The article is breathtakingly real; honest and raw with excellent factual insight. Much of which has been gleaned from extensive research. But one simple point is missing!
The matter of "justice". We all cry for this to happen; but thinking in the complexity of this happening through the legal system is slim, simply because of the continents spread of the issues noted above.
But, the real power and the bringing of "justice" will come by the hand of God. In whose timely hands we must continue to place this matter.
TSA has to realise wherever and whoever the real creators of this culpable humanitarian indictment. God knows them right "now" in the present moment and to Him they must account.
This stated. We must continue to pray and intercede for the people involved asking that God's light will shine in the dark and squalid place in the soul of TSA.
However we may never know, or see this happen; because God works his grace in us through mercy. His love changes the hearts of men in penitence and conviction; therein the miracle of Divine justice takes place.
To this end we must boldly approach the throne of God. Asking for restoration for the people of cheshwe and Holy Spirit led conviction within TSA that bends stubborn wills of those who have caused this culpable injustice.
Amen - well said, and very true.
Over the years many have observed that TSA does not apologize, does not change decisions, does not make amends, unless forced to by courts or settlements reached out of court.
Obviously, any Christian trusts and hopes in eternal justice, but this does not negate our responsibility to fight for justice here in this life, especially for the poor and oppressed. Prayers must be supported by considered strategic action.
The RC church did not apologize or make compensation for pedophilia just as a result of prayer. TSA in Australia likewise did not apologize and compensate victims of sexual abuse this year just as a result of prayer, although I'm sure there was much prayer involved. God requires overt action backed up by prayers in our closet.
You can't have one without the other.
I may be wrong, but I don't think this event is in the same 'class' as the Australian sex scandal - the people involved are largely still within Army ranks, and the people who would be justified in taking it to a civil court would be disinclined to do so because of the biblical stance on dealing with church disputes internally. Of course, the apostle Paul didn't have in mind the sheer impossibility of doing this with a church whose leadership is not modelled on the New Testament church and which refuses to even consider discussion according to the New Testament church principles. The only others who think it should be dealt with properly are us - the people contributing to this blog - and we are not directly involved - we just have a heart of compassion that is lacking in the leadership, and we want justice for everyone who has been hurt by the leaders' decisions. TSA knows this, and it looks as if it has decided to ride out the storm in the hope that it will go away.
But God is not asleep - He knows all our hearts, and will deal with us each accordingly in His time.
To anonymous above
"the people who would be justified in taking it to a civil court would be disinclined to do so because of the biblical stance on dealing with church disputes internally"
I don't consider the loss of life in the Chiweshe region to be an internal church dispute, just like sexual abuse is not a church dispute. Sexual abuse is a criminal offence and must be dealt with in a court of law. There are many people in the professions who consider that what TSA did in removing a surgeon, forcing him to break his oath as a Dr., is also criminal.
I think the consequences are certainly comparable - the damage of sexual abuse and death because of needed surgery, or longer term death from HIV because of the forced disruption in the regime of antiretroviral drugs. Both consequences ar at thee very least equally serious and perhaps loss of life could be viewed as even more serious.
I certainly agree with your comments, but who would take TSA to court over the matter?
No one will take TSA to court because the victims in Chiweshe can't afford lawyers, plus there's the complication of this saga happening in 3 different continents and countries.
The only justice now available is from the Lord. Time will tell. Ecclesiastes 12 verses 13-14 say this:
'Everything you were taught can be put into a few words: Respect and obey God! This is what life is all about. God will judge everything we do, even what is done in secret, whether good or bad'.
Post a Comment