Proverbial Leadership
‘When a country is in chaos, everybody has a
plan to fix it - but it takes a leader of real understanding to straighten
things out’
(Proverbs 28.2 THE MESSAGE).
CHAOS can arise anywhere. For example, in a well
ordered household the teenager’s room may resemble a shambles at times
with clothes and other items strewn around the floor. It may not be a major
matter although it could put a strain on
domestic peace and harmony!
Something of the same kind can happen in the
workplace. I once had a colleague whose office was indeed a sight to
behold! There were piles of files all over the floor and it was difficult to see the
desk for the litter which covered it. My
friend may have believed that an empty desk
indicated an empty mind! Not surprisingly, he spent a lot of time trying to
disinter needed documents from under the piles of paper and always seemed hassled.
Perhaps there was chaos inside as well as outside of the dear man! Thinking of him, and
not without sympathy, led me to
dredge from my memory a verse from an unknown
writer,
There was once an old
sailor my grandfather knew
Who had so many things which he wanted to do
Who had so many things which he wanted to do
That, whenever he thought
it was time to begin,
He couldn’t because of the
state he was in.
But from relatively harmless examples of the
kind of thing which we may all have experienced to some degree we may think of
more serious ways in which we may either find ourselves in a state of chaos or
be the cause of it.
I recall standing in a church building in
England where a couple of hundred chairs were battened in rows. My small son was
standing near the door of the building and leaned on the back row of chairs
causing it to fall forward and knock over the next row which knocked over the next
and so on until nearly all the chairs in the building were tipped over - much to my
amazement and the concern of the small boy responsible! In the same way it is
surprising just who or what can cause serious
chaos. For example, a momentary lapse of concentration on the part of one driver can cause a road accident and snarl up the
traffic of a great city.
Colin Morris wrote about a fitter he knew who
lived in a council house in Britain’s Midlands and worked on the assembly
line of a great aircraft factory, performing the same monotonous task every day.
Then one evening in North Africa a giant plane crashed on take-off and all
sixty-seven on board were killed. Officials searched the wreckage for clues and a tortuous
process of investigation took place.
Eventually it was established that the trail of
blame led to the little man in the English factory who just once in the thousands of times
he did the same boring thing made an error which was not noticed by those whose
task was to inspect his work. Chaos and carnage was the result of one little
mistake.
Sometimes of course the cause of chaos is not
inadvertent but deliberate.
The terrorist attack on the Trade Centre in New York is a terrifying example of the way in which a relatively small number of
determined people can wreak havoc, destroy lives and put a great nation in the grip
of fear.
Chaotic conditions can be the result of an historical legacy of prejudice and hatred. It may seem that some children have been
fed racial or sectarian bitterness with their mother’s milk. In one city I was
driving my daughter and her friend in a borrowed car through a rather rough area. A
fusillade of stones was aimed in our direction and I wondered why until my daughter
pointed out that the colour of the car would have had sectarian significance for
youngster in that district. We would have been marked out as some of ‘them’ and therefore
fair game for pot shots.
In some countries chaos is the result of a
pervasive culture of selfishness and greed. Extreme wealth and the most abject
poverty exist side by side, naturally giving encouragement to the ‘politics of envy’.
Unscrupulous practices may almost be taken for granted. At the airport in the
capital city of a developing country my wife and I spoke with an engineer whose company was
installing running water in some very poor districts. He told us that his firm
had to pay men to guard the pipes and prevent them being vandalised by other men
allegedly paid by the local mayor whose bottled water business was being threatened.
I have visited countries with beautiful scenery
and great natural resources where corruption, poverty and violence are rife.
The lines of the English poet, William Wordsworth, have come to mind.
I heard a thousand blended notes
While in a grove I sat
reclined,
In that sweet mood when
pleasant thoughts
Bring sad thoughts to the
mind.
To her fair works did
nature link
The human soul that through
me ran;
And much it grieved my
heart to think
What man has made of man.
Weapons of mass destruction are becoming more and more lethal. The threat of terrorist attacks means that everyone is living on the front line. Hatred breeds hatred with senseless killing and counter killing. Taking the principle of an eye for
an eye to its ultimate conclusion can only lead
to universal blindness but people are slow to find the ‘more excellent way’. In some
countries millions suffer from malnutrition while a large part of the gross
national product is devoted to military hardware.
But hand wringing is not the answer. Beating the
chest solves little. Easy answers fill the air but a radical solution is
needed.
The heart of the human problem is the problem of
the human heart, which, according to the Bible is ‘desperately wicked’
(Jeremiah 17.9 King James Version).
The need therefore is for leaders who see beyond
political expediency to a fundamental change of moral attitudes.
Distinguished professor Dexter Dumphy from the
University of Technology, Sydney, Australia says that the Christian Church
has both the values and the spiritual commitment to transform society...

15 comments:
From the internet: (27 questions)
How healthy is your church? Answer "yes" or "no" :
•Does your church tightly control the flow of information within its ranks?
•Does its leadership use public shaming as a method to gain the compliance of followers?
•Is the leadership intolerant or consider it evil persecution when criticized or questioned?
•Are you discouraged to associate with former members, being warned that they are evil or defiling; a danger to your spiritual welfare?
•Is leaving to join another church not approved by your elders equal to leaving God?
•Do you fear being rebuked, shunned, or ignored for expressing a different opinion?
•Is there a sense of control, rather than support?
•Is there a relentless obsession of reminding the sheep who’s in authority?
•Are you told not to ask questions as to why others have left, and told to accept the statements that your elders give you?
•Are books, tapes/CD’s, speakers, music, etc carefully controlled to keep only the church's belief structure before your mind?
•Is there a relentless campaign to keep you around church activities, expecting you to be at all meetings except if providentially hindered? And if absent, is your spirituality/dedication questioned?
•Is the concept subtly present that, when you please the 'pastor God is pleased and when your 'pastor' is not pleased with you, God is not pleased with you?"
•Is there present the breaking of even the closest family ties, to guard the flock?
•do leaders use guilt and shame as tools of control?
•are members encouraged to spy and report on each other, lest sin be found in the midst?
•Is there a dominant climate of fear – fear of failing to keep one of the rules of being held up to public humiliation and rejection?
•At church, are the normal lines between what is private and what is public knowledge broken, and members confess the most personal, and the most minor sins, as the conscience is being surrendered to the leadership?
•Are many (if not all) of the results from voting at congregational business meetings announced as... it is unanimous!?
•Is questioning condemned as whispering, back- biting, vicious slander, gossip, nit-picking, signs of a proud rebellious spirit, being disaffected and divisive?
•Are those who dissent publicly punished? Are their reputations murdered by veiled, or not so veiled revelations of sins past and present, as confidentiality is broken for the benefit of the leaders?
•Is there a misplaced loyalty from Jesus and God onto the leadership, which is idolatry?
•Is there harsh preaching & condemnation for your failures and are you deliberately being kept wounded and off balance by the haranguing and condemnation from the pulpit?
•Is “Persevere or be damned” and “listen to YOUR elders; obey YOUR elders”; "submit to YOUR elders" preached over and over again?
•Is paranoia the very air you breathe? Paranoia of falling from grace; thinking for yourselves; breaking the many unspoken rules as well as the clearly spelled out expectations of the leader?
•Are you becoming paranoid – carefully watching your every word and gesture, lest someone report your faults?
•Does a code of silence reign? Is no one to divulge the business of the church, or the faults of the leadership?
● Do the spiritual leaders give you the impression that either covertly or overtly, they have the right to tell you how you should manage your own family; presuming that they know your own family better than you know yourself?
RESULTS
"no" to all of the questions, your church is relatively healthy.
"yes" to a quarter or more, it is showing signs of being unhealthy.
"yes" to half or more, it is very, very unhealthy.
"yes" to three-quarters or more, it is an authoritarian cult.
As a soldier, I answered 9 with 'yes' (the ones I could relate to). Maybe officers would score higher? I would have preferred that my answers could have been all 'no'.
There is a sense of irony about a comment about political expediency and the photo of the Princess opening THQ, just saying.
TSA is courting the wrong 'royalty'.
As an officer, all the questions in the above polls were answered "yes". Now I really get while it is called the "cult of officership". However, under most of my other DC's, it wasn't as bad as it is with the present
Active Officer
USA
TSA desperately needs to change its leadership style. The officer above has given his/her honest assessment. How can officers thrive spiritually and grow the Kingdom in such an environment? The people at the top are invariably 'career' officers who have climbed the greasy pole by acquiescence to the movement, and have largely forgotten their Christian convictions in favour of loyalty to the organisation. The HH saga would not have happened if love had been the key consideration.
The world is a far more complex place than it was 30 or 40 years ago when today's leaders were last in a corps environment, and officers at the sharp end need spiritual support - not advice based on what is best for the 'organisation' - to help them manage. TSA deals in real people with real problems, and if the people with responsibility for human resources matters are not following the example of Jesus, only that of TSA, there isn't a hope for any of us.
The leadership may well have to initiate some self-sacrificing changes, but without these changes TSA will have a more discontented workforce unable to fulfil its spiritual mandate.
Would the person who wrote; "TSA deals in real people with real problems, and if the people with responsibility for human resources matters are not following the example of Jesus, only that of TSA, there isn't a hope for any of us", please contact me privately at, selmoscow@aol.com - thank you.
Salvation Army officership is a cult by pretty much any understanding of the term cult and like any cult, the leaders actually come to believe in themselves, their "divine authority" and their right to expect and require obedience from cult members.
Soldiership doesn't go this far but officership does. However, some lay soldiers are as much into the cult aspect as are officers, and to be fair some officers are not as successfully trained into the thinking and ways of the cult of officership as others are.
The officers not so into the cult, who remain independent and critical thinkers, often do not remain within the ranks of officership and when they leave they sometimes have difficulty de-programming their trained way of thinking about TSA. They often seem to exhibit a love/hate relationship with TSA.
If independent/critical thinkers remain as officers, they seldom make it to the rank of Colonel or beyond.
The cult of officership, at its worst, is idolatrous, because it equates in the minds of officers God's will as one and the same as the will of TSA leadership. The officer's covenant is made between an officer and God, but the training college experience and training muddies and blurs the distinction between God and the Army. Once this distinction has become blurred in the mind of an individual, they have fallen prey to idolatry without even being consciously aware of the process.
Like any cult, officership takes advantage of the beautiful idealism inherent in most human beings in their 20's or late teens, to attract people. At any age, the concepts of the call and the covenant are essential to maintaining the cult of officership. Therefore when officers might question the cult leadership, these two concepts are invoked - ex. if officers don't readily accept an appointment they may be told things like God will not call you to any place where He cannot use you. While there may be truth to such statements, they are used to keep officers in line with obedience to TSA. The statement might as well be TSA will not send you to any place where the Army cannot use you.
Individual interpretation of God's will is not encouraged - obedience and loyalty to the cult become the prime values, even over love and truth. Like for any cult's leadership, the issues are always about power and control for the purposes of the cult.
This whole article and comments certainly ring a few bells. Even for a former DE and soldier. I even think alot can be applied to soldiership too. However to a more or lesser degree.
All it takes is a very bossy CO and its done. Trouble is even the appointment system can bring this about in one change over. Often undoing valuable corps work in one sweep.
How very informative this is. I hope and pray people are taking note.
Of course, the Salvation Army cultic expressions and traits is only such within the wider historical Jesus movement cult, centred around a single 'Jesus' person, demanding total obedience , subservience and submission. One could call it a peculiar cult within a particular cult.
Many would see Jesus Christ as the cultic icon par exellence with total control over someone's life. The SA is not alone with having had people like William Booth and Bramwell Booth as classic cult leaders.
Many would find it very stiffling to belong to such an organised and organisational faith system. Others would find such certainties very comforting and reassuring. After all, the fastest growing sections within the Christian church are usually those that are the most demanding in, what would be deemed by some, cultic commitment terms.
Does it really matter? Not really when you are happy in Jesus and are willing to commit oneself.
'Does it really matter?'
Yes, it does. An organisation which puts itself, its structures and leaders above Christian compassion is not a true church.
'Many would see Jesus Christ as the cultic icon par exellence with total control over someone's life.'
What rot! Christian conversion is a choice - we all have free will to either accept or reject Christ as Saviour. This free will remains with us, and, depending on our convictions, we surrender to His will in varying degrees. Sadly I doubt if there are many living Christians who can say they are totally surrendered to Christ - if we are honest.
Thank you for your honesty and integrity by including yourself with those good folks who need to make a fuller surrender to Jesus.
What is 'rot' for one is perfectly acceptable to another person. The Salvation Army is a broad chur h with a huge variety of people and inclusive theolgy within its ranks. Thank God for there being room for me and thee in the same movement. Otherwise, where would you go, what would you do?
All I meant was that in the modern meaning of the word 'cult' Jesus couldn't be considered, as 'cult' suggests something false. The Salvation Army is not the only denomination around, and there is life after leaving.
There is no doubt that no single denomination is perfect either, but the Howard Hospital issue would take some beating for behaviour which was/is in such a total opposite direction to the life instructions in the Bible. And TSA allows no challenges either, which for thinking people these days is something of a turnoff.
Sure, we're all different, physically, mentally and spiritually, and in worshipping together we develop our spiritual lives in our pursuit of harmonious living, learning the gifts and fruits of the Spirit, but what I can't handle is the poor example of our leaders in their hard-hearted decisions and attitudes. I think because of this they indicate some marks of being a cult.
I’ve just read a ‘Christianity Today’ report of an interview with the new Pope. Salvation Army leaders should take note.
‘….The pope was also honest about his past leadership shortcomings. When asked how his experience as a Jesuit superior can serve his governing the universal church (the style of governance of the Society of Jesus involves decisions made by the superior, but also extensive consultation with his official advisors), Francis said, "In my experience as superior in the Society … I did not always do the necessary consultation. And this was not a good thing. My style of government as a Jesuit at the beginning had many faults. … I made my decisions abruptly and by myself."
Yet he has learned from his mistakes: "I say these things from life experience and because I want to make clear what the dangers are. Over time I learned many things. The Lord has allowed this growth in knowledge of government through my faults and my sins. So as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, I had a meeting with the six auxiliary bishops every two weeks, and several times a year with the council of priests. They asked questions and we opened the floor for discussion. This greatly helped me to make the best decisions. But now I hear some people tell me: 'Do not consult too much, and decide by yourself.' Instead, I believe that consultation is very important."
……………..’So what needs reforming? He wants to see the church as a "field hospital." He said, "The church sometimes has locked itself up in small things, in small-minded rules. The most important thing is the first proclamation: Jesus Christ has saved you. And the ministers of the church must be ministers of mercy above all. The confessor, for example, is always in danger of being either too much of a rigorist or too lax. Neither is merciful, because neither of them really takes responsibility for the person. The rigorist washes his hands so that he leaves it to the commandment. The loose minister washes his hands by simply saying, 'This is not a sin,' or something like that. In pastoral ministry we must accompany people, and we must heal their wounds."
…….And he wants to see clergy "who know how to dialogue and to descend themselves into their people's night, into the darkness, but without getting lost. The people of God want pastors, not clergy acting like bureaucrats or government officials."
It is said that TSA leadership is modeled on the Roman Catholic model. I sincerely hope they will follow this.
Autocratic leadership has no place in the 21st century, and especially not in a church.
Post a Comment