A difficult passage to interpret is that of 1 Timothy 2:8. At first, it appears to be a clear-cut directive from the desires of Paul that worshipers are to be holy. But a closer look into Paul’s first century context and social nuances reveals that there is much to be learned behind our English translations.My own translation reveals some details of the original intent, and commentary is required to hear the passage as Paul would have meant it and as his original audience would have received it.
“Therefore, I want men in every place to prepare themselves for ministry without impurities in their hearts or minds.”
Philip Towner brings up a significant understanding from Paul’s first century world that is required by modern readers, if we are to correctly interpret his message to the Christian worshipers in Ephesus. In his commentary, New International Commentary on the New Testament: The Letters to Timothy and Titus, Towner shares that “ἐν παντὶ τόπῳ” (Engl. In every place) was heard as an echo of Malachi 1:11 by the ancient Jews of Paul’s first century world.
In their ancient Jewish tradition, Malachi 1:11 and 14 go together to form one cohesive thought as a quote from God that quarrels were to be settled before one begins to pray. That teaching was based on the ancient practice of the Israelite priests who were required to purify themselves with water before they could enter the Temple and minister to God’s people (see Leviticus 16). The ritual hand washing of a priest was a public act that symbolized the purifying of the priest’s inner self, giving the message to the worshipers that the priest was purified of any emotional or mental strains including anger or feelings of dissension toward another child of God.
Further insight to this passage includes the historical understanding that the citation of Malachi 1:11 and 14 specifically symbolized God’s turning toward the nations with mercy, and the pronouncing of his judgment upon impure worship in the temple, thus teaching the importance of how men and women are to conduct themselves, not simply as worshipers, but as ministers in worship.
Like the Jewish priests, if a Christian minster’s behavior was carried out with a backdrop of negative thoughts and resentment, the negative effect would impact those inside and outside the place of worship.
One final important note: Pauline worship gatherings were primarily done in house churches. And, because the atrium of a house, where the worship was done, was considered a public domain, house-worship was considered a public activity. Any negativity in worship, which was a public event, would have posed a problem for Paul, as he was concerned, not only with the effective and God-honoring worship of Christians, but also with the public perception of Christians.
The intention of Paul’s words in 1 Timothy 2:8 are to remind the leaders of Christian worship to forgive and be forgiven (to present themselves pure) before they attempt to lead God’s people in worship.
Works Cited:
Philip H. Towner, New International Commentary on the New Testament: The Letters to Timothy and Titus(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006), p. 203.
Carolyn Osiek and David L. Balch Families in the New Testament World: Households and House Churches (Louisville, Kentucky:Westminster John Knox Press), pp. 16-7.

In His dust,
Johnny
Writer: Capt. Jonathan Gainey was born in Jacksonville, FL in June, 1969. He has been married to Staci, the daughter of retired Salvation Army officers, for twenty years and they have four children ages 18, 16, 12, and 4. Jonathan was commissioned as an officer in June of 2002, and is currently serving in his third appointment in New Bern, NC, USA. He is working on a Masters of Divinity from Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary and is the creator and manager of the Flocks Diner website, where his passion for learning and teaching is expressed and shared through writing and a weekly podcast.
7 comments:
In his dust? That's a new one... and it means??
Enjoyed the visit to Flock's Diner - nice offering of solid spiritual food.
Active UKT
"In His dust" is a reference to the ancient belief that one is to stay so close to his or her rabbi (teacher)that the dust from his (the teacher's) shoes gets on the disciple's clothing. This meant that the disciple stayed so close that he or she didn't miss a thing that could be learned.
Thank you- interesting term and perfect as a personal challenge and for use in the corps.
Former
USA East
Let's hope we don't upset too many hall cleaners in the process ... lol!
FORMER USA EAST
Johnny, welcome to the blog, good to see you writing for us, thank you!
On reading your article I was reminded of a holiday in Cyprus some years ago. We visited a monastery in Nicocia and just outside of the building was a tap for the monks to wash their hands prior to going in to worship. From my private devotions that week it was a most natural response for me to wash my hands too and pray 'Lord not just my hands and feet, but wash all of me as I enter into Your presence with a clean, pure heart.'
Thank you for the reminder of those very special moments!
Very interested to read your comment of 'In His dust' when most naturally we would want to shake it away.
'Wash from my hands the dust of earthly striving'
I guess there is a very real difference in what you are saying though!
May the Lord continue to bless and keep you in His dust!
UKT
David Watson, a Church of England Evangelical, first served the Parish of St Cuthbert, where as I recall and where he inherited a congregation of 6. The villagers were disillusioned and disappointed with the constant bickering within the church and all the mud slinging and deserted the church in large numbers....
Watson shared in a seminar that his oft repeated theme became Psalm 24:4 'He who hath clean hands ... and a pure heart' '; may enter this church and join this congregation and stories are told of his instructing the congregation that none could partake of the communion until they had reconciled with their neighbor. And that when the invitation to come forward for communion was given, many in the congregation would, enroute to the communion rail, first approach a fellow parishoner and there share a word and a Christian embrace. Others still left the church to queue up at a phone booth directly outside of the church were they would ring someone they had offended asking for forgiveness and then returning for communion.
Keep us ever dusty...
As a child and even as a young adult taking communion was just a part of every the Sunday service. As an adult I oft struggle with if I can or cannot take on a particular day. The soul searching can be painful but is that not what the experience of true communion is about? Tearing off the masks and making sure we are truly right with our world and those in it? Forgiving, healing, and changing. Amen and amen.
Post a Comment