Saturday, October 10, 2009

COVENANT PART -1-

It was covenant signing day. The officer stood at the pulpit and looked out at us as he prepared to speak about what his covenant meant to him. I was intrigued because during my two years at the College for Officer Training I had come to admire this man and his commitment to educating cadets. He always challenged us to think beyond what was commonly accepted as ‘gospel truth by the tried and true, the faithful of the beloved Salvation Army. What would he say?

The gist of what he said was this. “When I married my wife, I married her for who she was that day. My covenant with her was not based on my expectation that she would improve or change. I accepted her for who she was right then. It’s the same with my covenant with God and The Salvation Army. I accepted what The Army was that day without expectation that things would change or improve.”

For the last 17 years his words have stuck with me. They have been a blessing when things are good and a sore spot when things have not been so good. But they have never left me.

I asked a few officers to answer some questions for me about their thoughts on their officer covenant and what they understood about it. I was not surprised that each one believed that they had signed a covenant with God to serve Him - and the vehicle they chose to do that was The Salvation Army. One said, “… I signed it, with a clear understanding between God and myself, as a covenant with Him alone. As it turned out, I did stay with the institution for His mission purposes, whereas some of my close friends did not. And we all signed the same covenant, each of us fulfilling it in God-ordained ways.”

Not one of the officers who wrote to me considers their covenant to be with The Salvation Army. That is why for many who have left the Army, there is a sense that they have not broken their covenant and consider themselves to be still fulfilling it through other avenues of service.

And yet, The Army as an organization is so intricately involved with our covenant as officers, and some that wrote understood their covenant that way. For why would I be signing this covenant in the first place if not to serve God through The Army itself? I signed my covenant in a Salvation Army owned and operated school. My ordination, recognized by the government, is as a Salvation Army officer. If I then leave the Army, and cease to be an officer, how am I still being true to the covenant I signed? Consider what another officer had to say, “I understood that it was a commitment to The Salvation Army. Of course there was also an understanding that this was a covenant with God, but mostly I understood it as a commitment to officership. I understood that it meant that I would serve as an officer for the rest of my life and that I would be serving God by doing so as a minister of the Gospel of Christ.”

PART ONE

http://therubicon.org

KATHIE CHIU

Writer: Along with her husband Ed, Kathie Chiu has been the corps officer of Mountain View Community Church and is the Executive Director of The Caring Place ministries which includes a shelter, transitional housing and community programs, located in British Columbia, Canada. Kathie has five children and by June 2009 will have eight grandchildren. For over two years she has been writing a monthly column for Salvationist.ca called Just Between Us and right now is working on a blogazine called Full Potential to help equip leaders for ministry. Her passions include building and equipping others for ministry and writing, knitting and especially her family.

7 comments:

Bob Deidrick said...

"The organization has to change and grow as well".

The Salvation Army does much to help suffering humanity. It could do much more if as an organization , leadership would accept more change and implement change and encourage growth in various areas. I am not trying to be critical but I am making an observation.

Kathie,you have written a fine article with much to think about.Thank you so much for your insight and experience.

USA East, former officer

Anonymous said...

From a very young age I believed God was calling me to SA Officership. As soon as I could I entered the school for Officer training and was commissioned before my twenty first birthday. This was in an era when most people were in jobs for life; stayed with marriages for life and commitment was not a dirty word.

Since then, times have changed and we are in a non commitment era. Nothing lasts, nothing stays the same. These days 'when the going gets tough, the tough get going' they run like mad to greener grass and brighter skies, or so we think. Everything and everyone is disposible. When things don't go our way we get out. People walk away from jobs, marriages, ministry, officership. I am not convinced it is any different in other churches, people move on. I wonder if this is more about us, more about society, more about life in the 20th and 21st centuries and maybe just maybe we need to learn to get on with it, live with it, The Salvation Army and other churches too.

Former USA EAST

HS said...

'we know what we signed up for". I was 20, and when I look at my young adult sons, I recognize how much they don't know about life and about themselves at 20 (even though they think that they know a lot). What I thought I saw was not necessarily what I got, particularly in regards to the gender issues within TSA.

I also had little awareness of the legal status of officers. My understanding is that the way the covenant and the Undertakings of an Officer are worded actually provides no legal standing or obligations either for TSA or for the officer. Which then makes the relationship purely ethical or spiritual in nature. Hmm . . . feels like there's an article waiting to be written here.
Active, USA East

Bob Deidrick said...

I think a good point has been made.
Some folk did not realise what they signed up for. Some were young and got caught up in a movement. Others hoped for some change that didn't happen. Still others in frustration wait for a moving of the Spirit of God or wait for someone in leadership to "move" on or retire or both.
I would also agree that we are in an age that commitment is not what it once was in some cases. That will happen more and more as time passes by unfortunately.

Concerning the gender issue , I just read an article by Jimmy Carter about the misuse of scripture and leaders that abused women. My personal thoughts of how that relates to todays army is that
female officers are under utilized and mistreated and misunderstood. Often a description of the use of female officers is portrayed but in reality many are placed in areas where they are often overlooked and silenced. Catherine Booth would be very disapointed.

USA East former officer

FORMER SALVATION ARMY OFFICERS FELLOWSHIP said...

Bob, the Jimmy Carter article is in our archives and will be posted next week.
sel

Anonymous said...

"Thou shalt have no other Gods before me."

I signed a Covenant with God not the
Salvation Army. If thats what they wanted they should have worded it differently then many would not have signed it.

I don't think it is right to put the Church first. Obedience to God comes first before the Church.

The reason I agreed to bow out gracefully was because The Church meaning The Salvation Army asked full obedience before my best interests.

Like telling you to do something you weren't trained or qualified to do. Also being told to do tasks which Paid Employees did and not getting the same benefits that paid Employees got. Like a lunch or dinner break. I didn't mind doing anything but when I sat at a SwitchBoard for eight hours "On Christmas Day" and did not get any relief then that indicated to me they did not think very well of my welfare.

The nuns were the slaves of the Catholic Church and so were the single women officers in the Social Departments.

Wish I had the skill to write a book.

FORMER SALVATION ARMY OFFICERS FELLOWSHIP said...

The previous comment was from a 'former'; USA East