Should The Salvation Army rescind the Single-Spouse Officer provision? The SA's already done so in the New Zealand Territory, less than 6 years since it was
enacted. And rumblings suggest other territories are considering following
suit. (Part 4 in this series will detail some of the pros and cons.)
Here’s the regulation as it’s upheld in
more than 100 countries:
Officers
may be single or married. If married, both husband and wife must undertake the
same training, and both are ordained and commissioned upon completion of
training. Single officers wishing to marry must marry within the ranks or
resign their officership. Officers resigning their officership to marry may
remain in The Salvation Army as soldiers and may resume their officership if
the non-officer spouse elects to undertake officer training.
And thousands will witness to the
regulation’s effectiveness:
“All
through the years of our service, Janet and I have worked together… In no vocation is
a man’s wife more important to his work than in Salvation Army officership.”[1]
____________________________________
In a survey conducted over a six-month period
in 2010 among the then 300 members of the Former Salvation Army Officers
Fellowship it was revealed that approximately 26% of USA officers resigned in
order to marry a non-officers. And in Canada the figure was 24% as it was in
Australia. The UKT percentage figure was close to 20%. Note; The four USA territories, typically the more liberal and PC cling to antiquated ruling that "single officers wishing to marry must marry within the ranks or resign their officership". Many believe that the USA Territories are able to maintain the policy for two key reasons; TSA USA has a sufficient number of officers and cadets (this will be challenged in an upcoming article), and they have the financial and personnel resources to appoint non-officers to non-clergy adjunct positions earlier staffed by an officer.
.
Further, even the most cursory gleaning of
SA history relevant to officer losses will confirm that a second primary cause
for resignation resulted from an officer who came to the realization that the
‘call’ was not authentic. It’s true that one can live on projected or
transferred faith for a period of time. In fact it’s a frequent sermon topic
and used in instructing recruits in The Salvation Army.
The congregation at the public meeting, outside the Booth Tucker Memorial Church
SOUTH INDIA TERRITORY General Linda Bond - Commissioning Weekend
SOUTH INDIA TERRITORY General Linda Bond - Commissioning Weekend
This means that as many as 700+ officers
(1960-1990) in the above named territories might still be in active service
today had it not taken such an incredibly long time to modernize and get the
marriage regulation right.
Add to that the unknown number of SA
soldiers who skipped the officership application process because they refused
to get out their bonnet case and cape and retract to Booth’s autocratic
Victorian dictates. The number affected could easily number in the thousands…
Is there even the slightest question why our officer forces have dwindled by
40% or more?
Today’s article is not intended to question
why it took TSA, at least in many territories, to step into the 21st century
and allow officers to marry the person of their choice, but rather to consider
how the SSO provision can be strengthened and become more effective in achieving
TSA’s mission.
Can a non-officer’s spouse really make a
difference in achieving the SA’s expectations?
__________________________
To the Pastors' Wives,
I know it is unusual for me - a pastor - to
write in the Pastors' Wives Newsletter. But there is a story and a
message that I thought would be good for you to know. And as will become
evident, there is no one other than I who can tell this story.
Also, because of the nature of the story, I asked my wife Sandy to bypass
writing an introduction (to this blog), as she normally does.
So, here goes...
I did not grow up in a home that taught the
gospel of Jesus Christ. But by the grace of God I became a Christian on
December 11, 1973 through the witness of people who planted a Great Commission
church in Columbus, Ohio. It was in the church that Sandy and I
met. We fell in love and got married on December 3, 1977 - the happiest
day of my life (except for every day thereafter!). Since then,
Sandy has been my best friend - and my best
helper.
When we were newly married, the pastors of
the church planned a 5-day open-air preaching series on West Campus at Ohio
State. Jesus Christ was the focus of the series, as we addressed
topics such as, "Why Jesus Sociologically?" and, "Why Jesus
Psychologically?" and, "Why Jesus Philosophically?" I was
picked to start on Monday with "Why Jesus Historically," in which I
would share the proof of the resurrection.
This was a big step of faith for me…
Sandy and I drove to West Campus, parked
the car and strolled nervously to the grassy hill where students were eating
their lunches. I carried an easel with a cardboard sign that said,
"Why Jesus Historically?" We prayed, and I walked to the top of
the hill, and set up the easel. And then I started. "Today, I
want to talk to you about 'Why Jesus Historically' - why Jesus is the center of
history."
Of course, right away the snickers
started. "Oh, brother. Who is this kook? Oh, no, not
another religious nut." But to make matters worse, the day was very
windy - and 15 seconds into my preaching, the easel and sign fell down.
As if I didn't look foolish enough already! My courage was really
being tested. Quite honestly, I felt like giving up.
But then came Sandy.
Out of the corner of my eye, I saw her come
to the top of the hill. She picked up the easel and sign and held them in
the brisk wind. It was extremely windy that day. It took a lot of
effort on her part to keep the easel and sign upright. But she did
it. As people mocked, she just stood her ground behind me, holding this
sign that said, "Why Jesus Historically" while I preached about Jesus
and the resurrection.
I did not preach long. Unlike Tom
Short who gathers crowds and leads many to Christ, I did not see anyone come
forward to receive eternal life. I do not know of any students on the
grassy hill whose lives were changed that Monday afternoon. But I do know
this - my life was changed.
At a moment when my faith was being
severely tested, my dear bride stepped forward. This timid aspiring pastor
was bolstered by his wife who was willing to suffer with me in the cause of the
gospel. And I was forever changed.
On December 3, 1977, Sandy made a vow to
God and to me to stick by me through thick and thin. In the spring of
1978, on a grassy hill at Ohio State University she fulfilled that vow in
dramatic fashion. She held up my sign - and she has been holding
up my sign ever since. In doing so, she has not only affected me - she has
also affected the world.
Ladies, I cannot overstate the effect that
you have on your husbands. Your love, your support, your faith and your
loyalty are powerful. Very powerful.
God commands us to "Only be strong and
very courageous." (Joshua 1:7) For a man, sometimes his
courage is tested when God calls him to take on a new venture. Other
times his courage is tested when he is being questioned or attacked.
Whatever the situation, each man must face his fears. When his courage
and convictions are severely tested, each man must trust his God and climb the
hill. The world may laugh at him. But he must go forward.
When a man takes that step, it is not only
a God-moment for him. It is also a God-moment for his wife. She has an
opportunity to follow his lead-to join him at that critical moment when his
faith is being challenged. A wife has the great privilege to stand by
him, proclaiming the One who died and rose again on our behalf. It is her
opportunity to hold up his sign.
Ladies, you have no doubt had the
opportunity to hold up the sign of your husband many times in your life. When
you did so, you made an impact on your husband more than you will ever
realize. As you follow the Lord in the future, you will have many more
opportunities to hold up his sign. When that opportunity comes again,
seize it. Seize it with all of your heart. When you do, it will not
only transform your marriage. It will also transform the world.
John Hopler



2 comments:
I am a single spouse Officer with a non Salvationist partner. He would love to help and support me even more than he does but is uncomfortable not knowing where the boundaries lie. He has much to give and is invaluable to me. I think an 'Into Officership' course for spouses could be of value and could even encourage our spouses to consider commitment to the Army as it is they are left to flounder and because they are made to believe they are of no value and continue to flounder at their own church too because they are not very sure where they really fit in. Thank you for addressing this topic. How sad it is a former Officers site that is exploring it. I wish others would take it so seriously. I am so pleased I fell upon this blog.
Active UKT
Well said regarding an "Into Officership " course. I would like to see it as a seminar for non- officer spouses that isnoffered to them. Great idea...it needs to be done!
From a soldier from the Australian Eastern Territory.
Post a Comment