Abrams
was speaking on a panel, "Religious Conflict and the Future of the Middle
East," with Shadi Hamid, a fellow with the Project on U.S. Relations with
the Islamic World in the Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings
Institution.
|
Should
Presidents Call Islam a 'Religion of Peace?' Two George W. Bush Officials
Debate
BY
NAPP NAZWORTH
, CHRISTIAN POST REPORTER
November
21, 2014|9:00 am
MIAMI
BEACH — Two former George W. Bush administration officials, Elliot Abrams and
Michael Gerson, debated Monday whether it is appropriate for presidents to call
Islam a religion of peace.
"What
is authentic Islam? Is ISIS an authentic form of Islam, or is it not? I think
it's very important that the United States government shut-up about that
question," Abrams, senior fellow for Middle Eastern Studies at the Council
on Foreign Relations, declared at the Ethics and
Public Policy Center's Faith Angle Forum.
"It
used to annoy me enormously when President [George W.] Bush, for whom I was
working, would say, 'Islam is a religion of peace,'" continued Abrams, who
served as deputy assistant to the president and deputy national security
adviser.
Abrams
was speaking on a panel, "Religious Conflict and the Future of the Middle
East," with Shadi Hamid, a fellow with the Project on U.S. Relations with
the Islamic World in the Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings
Institution.
The
"real response" to Bush, and later President Barack Obama, declaring
the Islam is a religion of peace, he said, should be "where is their
theology degree from?"
"For
American government officials to be telling Muslims, 'I know real Islam' ... is
ridiculous," he added. "... It would be an outrage about Judaism and
Christianity as well. ... For government officials who are 99 percent
Christians to be trying to find what is authentic in Islam seems to me to be a
fool's errand."
Abrams'
comments came during the question and answer session and were not part of his
prepared remarks. The whole session lasted about three hours and he made
similar remarks later in the session in response to another reporter's
question.
When
presidents say Islam is a religion of peace, "the average American thinks
this is crap," he said, because the average American reasons that
"the only people doing the beheadings are Muslims, so don't tell me it's
all wonderful."
It
would be better, Abrams continued, for political leaders to ask, "is there
something in Islam that has led some Muslims to behave in a way we consider to
be terrible? And what's the debate within Islam?" Because, "that's a
real description of a real problem," but, "saying 'Islam is a
religion of peace' isn't [realistic]."
After
those remarks, Gerson asked for the floor to offer a different point of view.
"We
do praise Christianity as a religion of peace on Christmas, we do praise
Judaism as a religion of courage on Hanukah and other things. We praise Islam.
And every president from now on will praise Islam on religious holidays because
their are millions of peaceful citizens who hold this view," he said.
Gerson
was a speechwriter for Bush and may have helped craft the statements that
Abrams found objectionable. He now works as a columnist for The Washington
Post.
Presidential
statements about Islam as a peaceful religion is not only proper due to the
many peaceful Muslims who are American citizens, Gerson continued, it is also
"theologically sophisticated" because presidents should promote the
cause of those who hold values consistent with democratic governance, and this
is not unique to Islam.
"Every religious
tradition," he said, "has forces of tribalism and violence in its
history, background and theology; and, every religious tradition has sources of
respect for the other. And you emphasize, as a political leader, one at the
expense of the other in the cause of democracy.
"That
is a great American tradition that we have done with every religious tradition
that comes to the United States — include them as part of a natural enterprise
and praise them for their strongly held religious views, and emphasize those
portions that are most compatible with those ideals."
Abrams
countered that Islam is different due to its relationship to terrorists. By
calling Islam a "religion of peace" after the Sept. 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks, Abrams said, Bush was "basically lying about the
problem," because, ... the terrorists "view themselves as good
Muslims."
"How
is that exclusively a problem with Islam?" Gerson responded, then
mentioned other religious groups, such as Christians in Nigeria, who commit
violence in the name of their faith.
Part
of the role of political leaders, Gerson reiterated, is to acknowledge the
parts of every religious tradition that "encourage respect for the
other."
Abrams
conceded Gerson's point but maintained that presidents are not doing that when
they call Islam a religion of peace because the presidential statements lack
the nuance of Gerson's argument.