a forum for intelligent and respectful commentary. Opinions expressed by writers are solely their own.
Sunday, July 5, 2015
Advice on Same-Sex Marriage for US Church Leaders CONCLUSION
If you believe gay sex is sinful, it’s really no
morally different than straight sex outside of marriage.
Be honest, pretty much every
unmarried person in your church is having sex (yes, even the Christians).
I know you want to believe that’s not true
(trust me, I want to believe that’s not true), but why don’t you ask around?
You’ll discover that only a few really surrender their sexuality.
Not to mention t he married folks that struggle
with porn, lust and a long list of other dysfunctions.
If you believe gay marriage is not God’s design,
you’re really dealing with the same issue you’ve been dealing with all
along—sex outside of its God-given context.
You don’t need to treat it any differently.
By the way, if you don’t deal with straight
sex outside of marriage, don’t start being inconsistent and speak out
against gay sex.
And you may want to start dealing with gluttony
and gossip and greed while you’re at it. (I wrote more here about how to get
the hypocrisy out of our sex talk in church.)
At least be consistent…humbly address all forms
of sex outside of marriage.
The dialogue is possible. (Andy Stanley offers a
great rationale for sex staying
inside marriage here.)
We have that dialogue all the time at our
church.
And people are grateful for it.
We also talk about our greed, our gluttony, our
jealousy and our hypocrisy as Christians. It’s amazing. Jesus brings healing to
all these areas of life, including our sex lives.
4. The early church never looked to the
government for guidance
Having a government that doesn’t embrace the
church’s values line for line actually puts Christians in some great
company—the company of the earliest followers of Jesus.
Jesus spent about zero time asking the
government to change during his ministry. In fact, people asked him
to become the government, and he replied that his Kingdom is not of
this world.
The Apostle Paul appeared before government
officials regularly. Not once did he ask them to change the laws of the land.
Paul constantly suffered at the hands of the authorities,
ultimately dying under their power, but like Jesus, didn’t look to them for
change.
Rather than asking the government to release him
from prison, he wrote letters from prison talking about the love of Jesus
Christ.
Instead of looking to the government for help,
Paul and Jesus looked to God.
None of us in the West are suffering nearly as
radically as Jesus and Paul suffered at the hands of a government. In fact, in
Canada and the US, our government protects our freedom to assemble and even
disagree with others. Plus, it gives us tax breaks for donations.
We honestly don’t have it that hard.
Maybe the future North American church will be
more like the early church, rising early, before dawn, to pray, to encourage,
to break bread.
Maybe we will pool our possessions and see the
image of God in women. And love our wives radically and deeply with a
protective love that will shock the culture. Maybe we will treat others with
self-giving love, and even offer our lives in place of theirs.
Maybe we’ll be willing to lose our jobs, our
homes, our families and even our lives because we follow Jesus.
That might just touch off a revolution like it
did two millennia ago.
Perhaps the government might even take notice,
amazed by the love that radical Jesus followers display.
5. Our judgment of LGBT people is destroying any
potential relationship
Even the first 72 hour of social media
reaction has driven a deeper wedge between Christian leaders and the LGBT
community Jesus loves (yes, Jesus died for the world because he loves it).
Judgment is a terrible evangelism strategy.
People don’t line up to be judged.
If you want to keep being ineffective at
reaching unchurched people, keep judging them.
Paul also reminds us to drop the
uppity-attitude; that none of us were saved by the
good we did but by grace.
Take a deep breath. You were saved
by grace. Your sins are simply different than many others. And
honestly, in many respects, they are the same.
People don’t line up to be judged. But they
might line up to be loved.
So love people. Especially the people with whom
you disagree.
Those are a few of the things I’ve learned and
I’m struggling with.
The dialogue is not easy when culture is
changing and people who sincerely love Jesus sincerely disagree.
I think there’s more hope than there is despair
for the future. The radical ethic of grace and truth found in Jesus is more
desperately needed in our world today than ever before.
Is the path crystal clear? No.
But rather than being a set back, perhaps this
can move the church yet another step closer to realizing its true mission.
I was tempted to close comments off on this
post, but I will leave them open just to see if we can continue the discussion
constructively and humbly.
Rants and abusive viewpoints (on either side)
will be deleted.
Show grace.
Respect those with whom you disagree.
If you want to leave a comment that helps,
please do so.
But please spend at least as much time praying
for the situation and for people you know who have been hurt by this dialogue
as you do commenting on this post, on others like it or on your social media
channels.
Maybe spend more time praying, actually.
That’s what we all really need. And that’s what
will move the mission of the church forward.
Friday, July 3, 2015
Advice on Same-Sex Marriage for US Church Leaders
On Friday, the US Supreme Court ruled that
same-sex couples can now marry in all 50 states, setting off a flurry of
reaction by Christians and virtually everyone else on social media and beyond.
Ed Stetzer wrote a helpful background post to the shift in opinion that led to the decision and included links to a
number of other leading articles.
The social media reaction ranged from
surprising to predictable to disappointing to occasionally refreshing.
I write from the perspective of a pastor of an evangelical church in a country where same sex-marriage has been
the law of the land for a decade.
That does not mean I hold any uniquely deep
wisdom, but it does mean we’ve had a decade to process and pray over the
issue.
I hope what I offer can help. It’s my
perspective.
My fingers tremble at the keyboard because my goal is to
help in the midst of a dialogue that seems far more divisive than it is uniting
or constructive.
There will be many who disagree with me, I’m
sure, but I hope it pulls debate away from the “sky is falling/this is the best
thing ever” dichotomy that seems to characterize much of the dialogue so far.
The purpose of this post is not to take a position
or define matters theologically (for there is so much debate around that).
Rather, the purpose of this post is to think through how to respond as a church
when the law of the land changes as fundamentally as it’s changing on same-sex
marriage and many other issues.
Here are 5 perspectives I hope are helpful as
church leaders of various positions on the subject think and pray through
a way forward.
1. The
church has always been counter-cultural
Most of us reading this post have been born into
a unique season in history in which our culture is moving from a Christian
culture to a post-Christian culture before our eyes.
Whatever you think about history, theology or
exactly when this shift happened, it’s clear for all
of us that the world
into which we were born no longer exists.
Viewpoints that were widely embraced by culture
just decades ago are no longer embraced. For some this seems like progress. For
others, it seems like we’re losing something. Regardless, things have changed
fundamentally.
But is that really such a big deal? For
most of the last 2000 years, the authentic church has been
counter-cultural. The church was certainly counter-cultural in the first
century.
Even at the height of ‘Christendom’ (whenever
that was), the most conservative historians would agree that Christianity
as embraced by the state was different than the authentic Christianity we read
about in scripture or that was practiced by many devout followers of Jesus.
Being counter-cultural usually helps the church
more than hurts it.
If you think about it, regardless of your
theological position, all your views as a Christian are counter-cultural
and always will be. If your views are cultural, you’re probably not reading the
scriptures closely enough.
We’re at our best when we offer an alternative,
not just a reflection of a diluted or hijacked spirituality.
2. It’s
actually strange to ask non-Christians to hold Christian values
As the Barna Group has pointed out, a growing number of people in America
are best described as post-Christian. The majority of Canadians would certainly
qualify as having a post-Christian worldview.
The question Christians in a post-Christian
culture have to ask themselves is this:
Why would we expect non-Christians to
behave like Christians?
If you believe sex is a gift given by God to be
experienced between a man and a woman within marriage, why would you expect people
who don’t follow Christ to embrace that?
Why would we expect people who don’t
profess to be Christians to:
Wait until marriage to have sex?
Clean up their language?
Stop smoking weed?
Be faithful to one person for life?
Pass laws like the entire nation was Christian?
Seriously? Why?
Most people today are not pretending to be
Christians. So why would they adopt Christian values or morals?
Please don’t get me wrong.
I’m a pastor. I completely believe that the
Jesus is not only the Way, but that God’s way is the best way.
When you follow biblical teachings about how to
live life, your life simply goes better. It just does. I 100
percent agree.
I do everything I personally can to align my
life with the teachings of scripture, and I’m passionate about helping every
follower of Christ do the same.
But what’s the logic behind judging people who
don’t follow Jesus for behaving like people who don’t follow Jesus?
Why would you hold the world to the same
standard you hold the church?
First, non-Christians usually act more
consistently with their value system than you do.
It’s difficult for a non-Christian to be a
hypocrite because they tend to live out what they believe.
Chances are they are better at living out their
values than you or I are. Jesus never blamed pagans for acting like pagans.
But he did speak out against religious people
for acting hypocritically. Think about that.
3.
You’ve been dealing with sex outside of traditional marriage for a
LONG
time
End part
One
Wednesday, July 1, 2015
It's Thursday, Number 30 2nd July, 2015
NUMBER 30
Thursday 2nd July 2015
'The blessing of
the Lord was on everything Potiphar had, both in the house and in the field.,'
Genesis 39:5.
Having been sold
into slavery by his brothers, Joseph found himself in Egypt and was purchased
by the captain of the guard to Pharaoh, a man named Potiphar. Although he could
have had a far worse master, Joseph undoubtedly was not where he would wish to
be. Yet we read, 'the Lord was with Joseph,' (vs 2). Sometimes we find
ourselves in a situation and wonder why God has allowed it, or why he does not
rescue us from it. We can so easily assume that if God was really with us he
would not have allowed us to suffer so and as a result might think he has left
us.
The fact is, to
achieve his purposes through us, he might well take us though dark and
unpleasant experiences. Joseph could so easily become bitter or morose with
self-pity, but he didn't. From what we read he trusted God and made it his
business to let his light shine, whatever his situation. He focused on being a
blessing. And 'his master saw that the Lord was with him,' verse 3. Are those
around us always aware that the Lord is with us in our attitude, our words and
our actions I wonder? Potiphar was blessed as a result of having Joseph in his
home.
I am reminded of
that young Israelite girl that the Syrians took captive and was made to serve
the wife of Naaman, (2 Kings 5:1-3). The Syrians probably killed her parents
when they took her captive. She might have had every reason to feel bitter
towards her nation's enemies, yet she made herself a blessing to that
household. Someone else might well have taken delight at seeing the one
responsible for their suffering suffer too. But that young girl was full of
compassion for Naaman even though, as the commander of the king's army, he was
ultimately responsible for her situation.
When life is just
not fair, when we are badly treated or put in a situation we would rather not
be in, may we not be focused on the injustice of it all, but seek out how God
might use us to be a blessing there. It may well be that God deliberately
placed us there for that very purpose.
God bless you all.
God bless you all.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)