Saturday, February 22, 2014

HOW DID WE GET TO WHERE WE'RE AT? LGBT


Commissioner Joe Noland
Salvationism is a two part word: Salvation + ism. The salvation part is never changing – the same, yesterday, today, forever (The conservative part). Ism, by its proper definition is “a movement” – always changing: “Mobile, fluid, robust, pulsating, progressive, maturing – Genesis in motion.”

In other words, our methodology needs to stay relevant, inclusive and flexible in order to reach the last, the lost and least (The liberal part).
You will find that good, calculated, risk-taking begins to dissipate as mission metamorphosis into institutionalism.

Early day Salvationists were risk-takers for the right reasons. Let’s take this primitive concept and make it contemporary, sans the traditional, institutional regulations and regalia. For many that’s too scary (risky) to even think about.


THE SA - Stance on homosexuality (edited – SEL)

2001
Some in the United States, including employees and government agencies,  have alleged that The Salvation Army discriminates against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals in their hiring practices. The Salvation Army states they do not "discriminate against hiring gays and lesbians for the majority of its roughly 55,000 jobs". However, because The Salvation Army is a church, Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act of 1964 allows it to inquire into religious beliefs in its hiring practices.

The Salvation Army Western Territory approved a plan in October 2001 to start offering domestic-partnership benefits to gay employees. Members of various evangelical Christian interest groups protested the Army’s decision.



Focus on the Family founder James Dobson excoriated the Salvation Army for abandoning its "moral integrity" and urged his radio listeners to bombard the organization's offices with phone calls and letters. The American Family Association also accused the Salvation Army of a "monstrous ... appeasement of sin" that resulted in a "betrayal of the church."[48] In November 2001 The Salvation Army nationwide rescinded the Western Territory's decision with an announcement that it would only provide benefits coverage for different-sex spouses and dependent children of its employees.[48]

c. 2001 Religion News Service

Gay rights activists are stuffing fake $3 and $5 bills into the Salvation Army's red kettles this holiday season, protesting its denial of health benefits to gay partners of its employees.

The protests have been scattered so far. But officials at the Salvation Army--which takes in more donations than any other charity in the country--worry that they will mushroom after the holidays, making the organization, like the Boy Scouts of America, a symbol in the divisive battle over gay rights.

"Just wait, it's going to come," said Salvation Army Commissioner Joe Noland, Commander of the eastern territory and one of five members of the Army's national policymaking team.

Gay rights groups have hinted that a broad-based, national campaign may be unleashed when the timing is right. They have been reluctant to go on the offensive while bombs drop in Afghanistan and amid public desire for domestic unity in the aftermath of Sept. 11.

But "when all of this subsides, and it will, this issue with the Salvation Army will still be there and there will be a reaction," said David Smith, a spokesman for the Washington-based Human Rights Campaign, a leading gay rights group. "The same thing will happen to them that happened to the Boy Scouts."

The Boy Scouts ban gays, and in communities across the country, pressure has been put on the United Way, a major source of scout funding, to withhold money.

The current hullabaloo arises from the Salvation Army's decision--and later reversal of that decision--to permit its 13-state western territory to offer benefits to "legally domiciled adults," a broad term that could include gay partners of employees. At a time when the Bush administration is pushing government funding for faith-based groups, it illustrates the predicament some face in accepting money
with stipulations that run contrary to religious beliefs.

"What can seem like a relatively insignificant decision--even a well-intentioned one--can five, 10 or 15 years down the line be one of historical significance. And this decision has that kind of importance," said retired Salvation Army National Commander Robert Watson, referring to the insurance benefits"

Is this homophobic? Some people might call it that. Those who judge us might use some of those terms. "But if we change who we are to accommodate our culture or the pressures of those who would try to reshape us, we aren't who we say we are."

The Salvation Army, begun in London in 1865, says it is an evangelical Christian organization that serves the needy without discrimination.

But it also maintains that sex outside marriage is sinful. And in 1998, the Army gave up $3.5 million from San Francisco rather than comply with a 1996 requirement that organizations doing business with the city provide the same benefits to same-sex domestic partners as to married couples.

In late October, the Salvation Army's national policymaking team, the Commissioners Conference, decided to give each regional territory autonomy in making benefits decisions.

The western territory announced it would extend benefits to legally domiciled adults. San Francisco officials applauded.

But there was outrage on another front: Psychologist and evangelical radio kingpin James Dobson, whose "Focus on the Family" is broadcast by more than 3,000 stations every weekday, urged listeners to protest the decision, "because it will lead to similar decisions and compromises" at other Christian institutions.

In an interview, Focus on the Family spokesman Paul Hetrick cited Harvard University and the YMCA as two organizations that began with a Christian mission but gradually lost their religious identity. He said the Salvation Army's insurance decision could put it on the same road.

The Army was flooded with complaints--from donors and from members of the Salvation Army denomination, which is kept financially separate from the charity. Watson, the former national commander and author of "The Most Effective Organization in the U.S.," was among the influential critics.

"Let's swallow hard," Noland, the eastern territory commander, recalled telling his fellow commissioners. "Let's take a deep breath and make this thing right."

In mid-November, the decision was rescinded. "We deeply regret the perception that the Commissioners Conference surrendered any biblical principles in making the original decision," the charity said in a statement.

While that satisfied the Army's evangelical constituency, others were outraged.

"They are violating their own anti-discrimination language in their own mission statement and they're doing it absolutely in response to pressure from conservative religious groups," said Roey Thorpe, executive director of Basic Rights Oregon, based in Portland.

Thorpe has encouraged stuffing red kettles with the fake bills, printed off the Internet. One bill says, "When the Salvation Army ends its policy of religious bigotry and discrimination against gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered people then, and only then, will this be a real dollar bill."

The Internet home page of the Washington-based Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbian and Gays also promotes the protests, which it says began with its Genesee County chapter near Flint, Mich.

Meanwhile, the American Family Association of Michigan has promised that for every fake bill found in a kettle, it will donate an equal amount to the Genesee County Salvation Army, up to $1,000. "We've been averaging two, three or four fake bills per night," said Major Ralph Bukiewicz, the Salvation Army's Genesee County commander.

Colonel Tom Jones, a national spokesman for the Salvation Army, said fake bills also have turned up in Detroit, Chicago and Milwaukee. The impact has been insignificant considering that the Salvation Army collected $1.4 billion in donations last year.

"There is something happening out there," Jones said of the scattered protests, "but it appears to be limited.

Sunday: FOCUS ON THE FAMILY


SATURDAY FEB 22, 2014
_________________________________________

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thank you for clearing up all the different reasons for targeting the army as homophobic!
S. Louis

Anonymous said...

The trouble with appeasement is - accommodate one demand on your Christian standards, and once that has been secured, others are made, so you follow again, and in the end you may regard yourselves as a fully matured 'ism', having compromised/evolved on everything, because after all, how can you discriminate against any of the reasonably-stated demands? but when you have no standards left to stand up for that's when you'll realise you've been hoodwinked, but by then it will be too late. Your identity as a movement will be lost, and there may still be fake notes going in the red kettles, because you will never satisfy these types of demands.

Anonymous said...

Thank you Sven for opening up this dialouge around the SA world.

Anonymous said...

Not appeasement - The Western Territory were simply ahead of the curve on this one, but the Army - especially National - managed to anger everyone in their terrible handling of it, which is why their current campaign, laying the blame at the Australian Major, is so disingenuous.

Paying domestic partner benefits was the right decision. We have no moral tests on any other benefit, and already paid unmarried couples benefits for example. We don't withhold health insurance in cases of 'immoral' injuries. We don't ban people from spending their wages on sin. Once society started (slowly) to accept domestic partnership, then it was inevitable that we would eventually extend our benefits to those couples.

The West were forward thinking, but instead, we've ended up building a near indestructible barrier between us and the LGBT community - and the generations of young growing up in a more tolerant climate - and all because we were afraid of James Dobson.

Guess what: we pay domestic partner benefits now, and no one cares.

Stacey Gray said...

My grandparents would roll in their graves! Their beloved Army, advocate of God’s unconditional love, valiant warriors for right, vigilant in their promotion of the cause of humanity, focused upon bringing souls to God’s grace ….. stopped in its forward march after being fragged from the rear by self-serving “allies”. Focus on the Family and the American Family Association, 2 certified hate groups bent upon denying God’s equity to some, 2 organizations focused upon betterment of their own cause, 2 organizations that have never done anything to bring up those in need, were allowed to not only halt this Salvation Army in its tracks, but to then redirect its march to exclude “the least of these, thy brethren”.

Read the American Family Association’s mission statement, and their accomplishments report at http://www.afa.net/Detail.aspx?id=31#OUR-MISSION, and Focus on the Family’s at http://www.focusonthefamily.com/about_us/guiding-principles.aspx . Now consider how their focus on secular issues and societal manipulation conflicts with the Salvation Army’s mission (http://www.salvationarmyusa.org/usn/mission-statement) of preaching “ the gospel of Jesus Christ and to meet human needs in His name without discrimination.”

One of grandfather’s favorites was Proverbs 29:18, “Where there is no vision, the people perish”. Where is this Army’s vision today? Will it continue to resign itself to the demands of “holier than thou” fundamentalists and retreat behind the banner of their with a secular agenda, or will it remain faithful to the only commandment Jesus gave, John 13:34? )“A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”)


"Onward, Christian Soldiers! Like a mighty army moves the church of God; brothers, we are treading where the saints have trod. We are not divided, all one body we, one in hope and doctrine, one in charity. "

Stacey Gray said...

In my previous post please edit the third paragraph to read:
One of grandfather’s favorites was Proverbs 29:18, “Where there is no vision, the people perish”. Where is this Army’s vision today? Will it continue to resign itself to the demands of “holier than thou” fundamentalists and retreat behind the banner of their secular agenda, or will it remain faithful to the only commandment Jesus gave, John 13:34? )“A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”)