Is Baptism Necessary for Salvation? PART 2

Part 2

Acts 2:38, "Peter replied, ‘Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins.  And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.‘"

This verse is often used to say that baptism is part of salvation, but we know from other scriptures that it is not, lest there be a contradiction.  What is going on here is simply that repentance and forgiveness of sins are connected.  In the Greek, "repent" is in the plural and so is "your" of "your sins."  They are meant to be understood as being related to each other.  It is like saying, "All of you repent, each of you get baptized, and all of you will receive forgiveness."  Repentance is a mark of salvation because it is granted by God (2 Tim. 2:25) and is given to believers only.  In this context, only the regenerated, repentant person is to be baptized.  Baptism is the manifestation of the repentance, that gift from God, that is the sign of the circumcised heart.  That is why it says, "repent and be baptized."

Also, please notice that there is no mention of faith in Acts 2:38.  If this verse is a description of what is necessary for salvation, then why is faith not mentioned?  Simply saying it is implied isn't good enough.  Peter is not teaching a formula for salvation, but for covenant obedience, which is why the next verse says that the promise is for their children as well.

1 Pet. 3:21, "and this water symbolizes baptism that now saves you also -- not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a good conscience toward God.  It saves you by the resurrection of Jesus Christ."

This is the only verse that says that baptism saves, but the NIV translation of the verse is unfortunate.  A better translation is found in the NASB which says, "and corresponding to that, baptism now saves you."  The key word in this section is the Greek antitupon.  It means "copy," "type," "corresponding to," "a thing resembling another," "its counterpart," etc.  Baptism is a representation, a copy, a type of something else.  The question is "Of what is it a type?" or "Baptism corresponds to what?"  The answer is found in the previous verse, verse 20: "who once were disobedient, when the patience of God kept waiting in the days of Noah, during the construction of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through the water.  21And corresponding to that, baptism now saves you," (NASB).

Some think that the baptism corresponds to the Ark because it was the Ark that saved them, not the floodwaters.  This is a possibility, but one of the problems is that this interpretation does not seem to stand grammatically since the antecedent of

Baptism is most probably in reference to the water, not the Ark.

But, water did not save Noah.  This is why Peter excludes the issue of water baptism being the thing that saves us because he says, "not the removal of dirt from the body but the pledge of a good conscience toward God."  Peter says that it is not the application of water that saves us but a pledge of the good conscience.  Therefore, baptism here most probably represents the breaking away of the old sinful life and entrance into the new life with Christ -- in the same way that the flood waters in Noah's time was the destruction of the sinful way and, once through it, known as entering into the new way.  Also, Peter says that the baptism is an appeal of a good conscience before God.  Notice that this is dealing with faith.  It seems that Peter is defining real baptism as the act of faith.

Acts 22:16, "And now what are you waiting for? Get up, be baptized and wash your sins away, calling on his name."

Is the washing away of sins done by baptism, the representation of the circumcised heart (Col. 2:11-12) which means you are already saved, or is it by the blood of Christ (Heb. 9:14; Rom. 5:9; Eph. 1:7)?  Obviously it is the blood of Jesus and the washing here refers to the calling on Jesus' name.

Rom. 6:4, "We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life."

Because the believer is so closely united to Christ it is said that the symbol of baptism is our death, burial, and resurrection.  Obviously we did not die -- unless, of course, it is a figurative usage.  And that is what it is here.  The figure of baptism represents the reality of Christ's death, burial, and resurrection.  It is a covenant sign for us.  Remember, a covenant sign represents the covenant.  The covenant sign of baptism represents the covenant of grace which is that covenant between God and the Christian where we receive the grace of God through the person of Christ by means of his sacrifice.

Titus 3:5, "he saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy.  He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit."

The washing of rebirth can only be that washing of the blood of Christ that cleanses us.  It is not the symbol that saves, but the reality.  The reality is the blood of Christ.

Gal. 3:27, "for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ."

This is speaking of the believer's union with Christ.  It is an identification with, a joining to, a proclamation of loyalty to, etc.  In 1 Cor. 10:2 the Israelites were baptized into Moses.  That means they were closely identified with him and his purpose.  The same thing is meant here.

Conclusion

Baptism is not necessary for salvation.  It is the initiatory sign and seal into the covenant of grace.  As circumcision referred to the cutting away of sin and to a change of heart (Deut. 10:16; 30:6;  Jer. 4:4; 9:25,26;Ezk.44:7,9) baptism refers to the washing away of sin (Acts 2:38; 1 Pet. 3:21; Tit. 3:5) and to spiritual renewal (Rom. 6:4; Col. 2:11-12).  The circumcision of the heart is signified by the circumcision of the flesh, that is, baptism (Col. 2:11-12).

One last thought: If someone maintains that baptism is necessary for salvation, is he adding a work, his own, to the finished work of Christ?  If the answer is yes, then that person would be in terrible risk of not being saved.  If the answer is no, then why is baptism maintained as being necessary the same way as the Jews maintained that works were necessary?

 Matt Slick

The Sacraments and the Bible

A personal review and testimony by Pauline Fidoe from her perspective as a Salvationist who came from a Baptist tradition, August 7th 2007.

'A valuable teaching tool, both for new and not so new Salvationists.'

This book is excellent. Set out in a simple easy to read style it gives the reader a clear and concise understanding of The Salvation Army's premise regarding the subject matter.

I have not always been a Salvationist but have come from a mainly Baptist background. Nothing 'spiritual' had come to mean anything to me through childhood and beyond. One day in 1970 I experienced a profound touch of God whilst in a Baptist chapel. That experience was very real and I needed to speak with the minister. I was totally ignorant of church beliefs and the Bible. The minister, a deaconess, gave me a verbally concise understanding of the beliefs and practices of Baptist spirituality. I took those beliefs etc. as being the norm for the whole church. Gradually I learned differently as I worked in conjunction with several other denominations through the churches together network, especially in London. I found division and criticism with each one defending any difference. I began to search for joy among believers in unity and mainly drew a blank.

Tacitly The Salvation Army was looked upon as being peculiarly 'different'. Their work was recognised and applauded but.....

There was always a 'but'.

The circumstances of life brought me to live in Hythe, still looking for joy as well as faith. I began to attend the Hythe Corps and found that joy plus a simple straight forward preaching of the glorious Gospel.

I knew they did not water baptise or celebrate the communion service, but I did not then fully understand why. However, with the joy and love I was experiencing along with unity and the Gospel preaching I became a soldier.

Now, of course, with this book I am a soldier who has gained understanding which I can fully accept. Furthermore I see that the book can provide a valuable teaching tool, both for new and not so new Salvationists.

Also, because it is written without bias, it will certainly give enquirers from other church backgrounds a clear understanding of the Army's biblical premise regarding the sacraments and allow them to make up their own minds.

Well done Captain Philip - I read your heart in your book.
  Pauline Fidoe